similar to: phab unit tests + libcxx tests w/concurrency

C++ and Java memory models impose restrictions for locks and unlocks, such as a thread that releases a lock must acquired the lock, or the number of locks must be larger than the number of unlocks in the same thread... for enabling some optimizations, for example, simplifying trylocks (http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2008/HPL-2008-56.html), and moving some instructions inside lock acquires

There was some discussion a while back about adding a C++0x-style memory model and atomics for LLVM a while back (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/31295), but it got stalled. I'm going to try and restart progress on it. Attached are two patches; the first adds a section to LangRef with just the memory model, without directly changing the documentation or implementation

I have a UIP200 on the way for eval. Does anyone have tips or tricks to get it working right away with * ? I hate having to go through the pain someone else braver than I went through already. :) Tim --

+eugenis I see this while running 'check-msan'. On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 9:10 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Is no one else seeing this? (I've been seeing it for a few days) > > In file included from > > /usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/llvm/src/utils/unittest/googletest/gtest-all.cc:39: > In file included from > >

A recent change added defined(__linux__) condition to the code below. Now it says that on linux with --std=c++0x (or --std=c++11) the system stdlib.h header must define aligned_alloc(). Really? include/__config: #if ( defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__linux__) ) && (__ISO_C_VISIBLE >= 2011 || __cplusplus >= 201103L) #define _LIBCPP_HAS_QUICK_EXIT #define _LIBCPP_HAS_C11_FEATURES

Is no one else seeing this? (I've been seeing it for a few days) In file included from /usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/llvm/src/utils/unittest/googletest/gtest-all.cc:39: In file included from /usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/llvm/src/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:57: In file included from

Hi, On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov < eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > A recent change added defined(__linux__) condition to the code below. > Now it says that on linux with --std=c++0x (or --std=c++11) the system > stdlib.h header must define aligned_alloc(). Really? > > include/__config: > > #if ( defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__linux__) )

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov > <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A recent change added defined(__linux__) condition to the code below. >> Now it says that on linux with --std=c++0x (or --std=c++11) the system >> stdlib.h header

Hi, On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov < eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > > I am guessing you are running on this on an old system. My glibc version > is > > 2.17 > > Yes. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with glibc 2.15 does not have aligned_alloc. > Then I guess

You can use #if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 17) On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:13 PM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov < > eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: >> > I am guessing you are running on this on

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 17) Attached patch should work. Please test. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130513/7670a30e/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

Thanks, it works. 2.15 has quick_exit and at_quick_exit. The attached patch also works. On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:22 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: >> >> __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 17) > > > Attached patch should work. Please test. > > Regards. >

Hi, On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov < eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, it works. > 2.15 has quick_exit and at_quick_exit. The attached patch also works. > Looks good, please send it as a patch so it can be applied. Sorry for the breakage. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

It would be a real kick to get one of these to run Asterisk. :) http://www.gumstix.com/ Tim -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>

Folks, It seems like the * v 0.9 and iaxcomm won't speak to each other. Is there another IAX2 client that is usable under Linux (Debian preferred)? Thanks, Tim --

Hey, Anyone noticed that the new Phab is really really slow on mobile phones? It takes 1 or 2 seconds for any scroll to take place after a swipe, typing showing up, and something like 5 seconds for name matching or line comments to appear. The old Phab worked much better, and my phone is not that old (Nexus 5). I'm betting it's a big increase in Javascript usage for eyecandy support. If

Folks, I'm looking for a SIP or IAX phone for field techs to take with them when out on service calls. The regular desktop phones are just way too big. Is there anything like the size of a full-sized cell phone? Or smaller, not I doubt that... Tim --

On 11/14, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > Ideally I’d even really like to have a both checking for revision on > phab, clang-formatting them, and post a comment when there is a > mismatch :) I'd like that! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL:

Does anyone have any recent news on the Virbiage FT201 IAX Hardphone? I'd *really really* like to deploy these phones instead of SIP hardphones, and I can't help but wonder if I'm going to shoot myself in the foot (or another sensitive area) by deploying a ton of SIP phones just to find the IAX Hardphones were released a week later... Thanks, Brian D'Arcy

Hi, I log in to Phab using my @chromium account with the "Log In or Register Google" button on https://reviews.llvm.org/auth/start/?next=%2F . That has worked fine for me, but now it fails with ``` Auth > Unhandled Exception ("Exception") Expected to retrieve an "account" email from Google Plus API call to identify account, but failed. ``` Is anyone else