similar to: Whose responsibility is it to maintain tests using experimental backends?

https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#new-targets says that experimental backends should be supported by an active community, in part by providing build bots and fixing bugs related to the backend. So while it doesn't *explicitly* say things about patches that only break those backends, I think reading the spirit of that policy says that it's the responsibility of the experimental

Hi, There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR. It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved. Should we just make it a normal target? Nico -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> > Should we just make it a normal target? > My only remaining reservation here - the generic DebugInfo tests, which presumably due to an unimplemented 16-bit branch somewhere deep in the llvm-objdump callstack. The AVR backend passes virtually all of the LLVM test suite but these when avr-unknown-unknown is set as the default target. It feels like the inclusion of ~80 XFAILs for these

What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target? Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so? -Chris > On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +better dylanmckay address > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote:

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The builder isn’t marked as experimental so I think the expectation is that people keep it green and contact the bot owner if they need help figuring out why their change makes it red. That said, it sounds a bit odd to have a non-experimental builder for an experimental backend. >

Hey all, Every few weeks, a change is committed to trunk that breaks the AVR buildbot. A problem presents when commit authors do not fix the build, and just leave it because it passes on the core buildbots. The build stays red for a few days until I go and check it. In the meantime, it likely causes spam for most if not all developers when they commit new code. All commits should keep master

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:18 AM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> Every few weeks, a change is committed to trunk that breaks the AVR >> buildbot. >> >> A problem presents when commit authors do not fix the build, and just

lld/test/ELF/invalid/symtab-sh-info.s (check-lld-elf) is recently flaky on Windows, e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/harbormaster/unit/view/192869/ http://45.33.8.238/win/27684/step_10.txt It fails like every 3 or 4 builds. Could someone with a Windows machine check what is going on? Is that due to output non-determinism (just my guess) in yaml2obj.exe? -------------- next part -------------- An

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Author: mws Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 350b29b024d8b672585c7a66fcea71985a54f77f Log message: 6202015 fmd should only load plug-ins whose filenames end in .so 6369961 fmd emits identical diagnosis after repair when case was never closed 6385004 mc-amd driver leaks property string on attach 6385007 fmd is not decrementing buf total when cases are closed Files: update:

i did some cleanup first, but now i'm choking on a much earlier stage than i first thought. -- logcheck for file in $(egrep --text -v "(^#|^[[:space:]]*$)" $LOGFILES_LIST); do logoutput "$file" done -- that falls apart if you insert in /etc/logcheck/logcheck.logfiles a line like /var/log/auth .log even if you escape it with "", which is a valid

Hi, On 20/02/2015 11:29, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > Hi, > >> Now, I have a question: what about the "offset" parameter? How it >> modifies our assumptions and calculations if the "offset" parameter is >> not zero? > > The offset influences only the start address of the > partition. The alignment goal is about the end address. > So

Hi, The lli interpreter crashed for the following case: ; ModuleID = 'x.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple = "i686-pc-linux-gnu" define i32 @main() { entry: %retval = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] %tmp = alloca i32 ;

Hi, How to find in a module, the list of functions whose addresses are ever taken into some variables? - Sanjiv

Each function is a GlobalValue. Find all the uses of them... any uses that are not a "call" with the function as callee goes into your list. Global variables work the same way. Find the uses of them that are not "Load" or "Store" instructions with the global value as the pointer operand. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sanjiv Gupta<sanjiv.gupta at

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Chuck Zhao <czhao at eecg.toronto.edu> wrote: > I don't, and the compiler doesn't neither, that is the problem, unless I do > hacking at compile time. > E.g.: > - put all such function's definitions into file1.c > - force to compile file1.c 1st. > - when compiling file2.c: >  . read file1.bc >  . attach to file2's

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3224 Bug ID: 3224 Summary: SSH should be (optionally) clear whose password is asked for Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Hello, I'm trying to take the correlation of two distance matrices and get the r2 value ex) Ndisc PS1 Ntet Nsito NcB NcA PS3 NcC NiB NiA PS1 0.08945 Ntet 0.08601 0.02020 Nsito 0.09361 0.02780 0.02260

I would like to simulate a stochastic process by specifying an intensity function, say lambda(t)=0.05 + 3 exp(鈭抰) I have the following code, but it has a number of problems. One issue I have is I do not know where the time variable is. I would appreciate your help with this code. library("survival") n <- 5000 lamc<-0.08 k1<-0.05 k2<-3 ld<-function(t){k1+k2}

Unluckily I dela with miRNA files whose name may contain the character "*". Because of the special meaning of "*" I have to remove it. I found out how to make list.files() extract only those file names which contain a "*" Namely: # list.files(pattern="\\*") Now I have to process all files whose name does NOT contain the character "*". I cannot