similar to: Difficulty over USB with a CyberPower 800AVR and nut 2.0.3

i own a CyberPower OR2200LCDRM2U and was wondering if any nut drivers support this ups. none i have tried have worked although usbhid-ups did tell me that the productid=0601 was not supported yet. i see in the compatability list on the nut website that the PR2200 is supported with the powerpanel driver but the OR2200 is not listed. i am interested in what i am doing wrong or if this is a support

Begin forwarded message: > From: James Erickson <jimerickso at gmail.com> > Date: August 10, 2009 2:50:52 PM EDT > To: Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] CyberPower OR2200 > > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:38:32PM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote: >> >>> From: James Erickson >>> Date: August 9, 2009 6:17:51 PM EDT

Hi Scott, Scott Alfter wrote: > I had a UPS go bad recently (shuts off all by itself for no good reason, >AFAICT), so I bought a CyberPower 685AVR this afternoon. The two CyberPower >drivers in NUT 2.0.2 don't know how to talk to it, but the hidups driver >appears to work properly. This means you have to use USB instead of RS-232 (it >supports both), but at least it works. >

I have two problems. The first is that when I dial my number from a phone on the Internet or any phone outside my LAN, Asterisk does not respond in any way, which means somehow my system is not picking up the fact that there's an incoming call to it. The second problem is that I thought I'd try an internal phone to see if I could get the hello-world stuff working at the least. I

I'm having a strange problem recently with a Yealink SIP-T28P phone connected to Asterisk 11.4.0 via openvpn. It was working fine for months, and now when I dial anything from the phone, it shows "Forbidden", and the Asterisk console shows: [May 21 10:47:49] NOTICE[28518][C-00000004]: chan_sip.c:25189 handle_request_invite: Failed to authenticate device "Ext 110" <

I'm trying to get a CyberPower PP1100 working with NUT on a Fedora 16 system and not having much luck. Kernel: 3.4.4-4.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 5 20:01:38 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux NUT (installed from Fedora RPM): nut-client-2.6.4-1.fc16.x86_64 nut-2.6.4-1.fc16.x86_64 libusb: libusb-devel-0.1.3-9.fc16.x86_64 libusb1-1.0.9-0.6.rc1.fc16.x86_64

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Davies" <davies147 at gmail.com> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:39:29 AM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] "Retransmission Timeout" results in > dropped calls after 32 seconds > >

I have a setup with Yealink phones & Asterisk Server (all latest patches). I am using BLF to display the states of other phones. While this works MOST of the time (busy, being called) it does NOT work when a phone is NOT regisstered at all, the yealink phones display a green dot EVEN if a phone is turned off (try explain this to users, they are shaking their heads!!!) I can see on the

Hello list, I need to set Voice QoS and SIP QoS for YeaLink. The possible values are 0 ~ 63. With Grandstream I can fill in DiffServ 46, which is EF. That's what I want. With Snom I fill in 184, which corresponds to EF or DSCP 46 (according to their wiki) But what value do I want to fill in with this YeaLink ??? This is a conversion table :

I'm running icecast and ices that I got out of CVS last night. I'm attempting to set up a live stream from /dev/dsp to /live.ogg. I've basically tweaked the icecast.xml and ices-live.xml to do this. Things seem to start up fine, and I get this in the icecast error log: [2003-02-19 21:58:11] INFO connection/_handle_source_request Source logging in at mountpoint

I've just started deploying these (well the T28P model) after years of Snom issues and they look pretty good (although the documentation is execrable; if you thought the Snom stuff was obtuse Yealink have got them knocked into a cocked hat!). Anyway, for provisioning I use HTTP with a DHCP entry like:- # # Yealink Phones # group { #

Hi, Sorry for an OT post but striking out a bit at the moment trying to get a response from Yealink R&D. Has anybody successfully managed to get a Yealink phone to work across Open-VPN when using tlsauth ? We really do hope that it is possible due to the benefits tlsauth offers against DoS. -- Thanks, Phil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, We are toying with setting up a redundant data center for our hosted PBX product, and plan to use the OpenVPN feature of our Yealink phones for connectivity to each data center. The feature has been fantastic with the first data center, allowing us to bypass all SIP NAT issues entirely and allowing remote access to the phones' web interface without having to touch the customers'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi List, I have come across the above handset a few times in the UK, They are quite cheap over here (~?80) Not the best handset in the world but works well enough. I have been asked to setup a central config server for a large collection of these handsets. I know they can do Auto provisioning via FTP/HTTP/TFTP I have got an example of the generic

This was supposed to go to the list. I am now thoroughly confused. In the [voipms] stanza where endpoint is defined (type=endpoint), everything points to voipms. But in the [yealink] stanzas, I tried pointing everything to Steve, one item at a time, then both of them, and nothing changed. On 5/24/2023 10:00 AM, Stefan Tichy wrote: block quote Am Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:40:18AM -0400 schrieb

Hello, I am running Asterisk 11.12.0 on CentOS 6.4. The asterisk server and internal phones are located on the 10.10.32.0/21 LAN subnet. I have many internal SIP phones, which appear to be working correctly. I have a few external phones (Yealink SIP-T32G or other Yealink model) on 192.168.32.0/24 which have an OpenVPN client configured on them that connects back to the LAN network through a

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Administrator TOOTAI" <admin at tootai.net> > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:43:33 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OpenVPN Clients Intermittently Cannot Call In > > > I am running Asterisk 11.12.0 on CentOS 6.4. The asterisk server and > > internal phones are located on

Arjen, I read the following in the upgrade notes and just wanted to see what the status was for the cyberpower driver? The note reads: - The cpsups and nitram drivers have been replaced by the powerpanel driver, and removed from the tree. The cyberpower driver may suffer the same in the future. What does this mean to me -- a cyberpower user? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law

Hi, guys. I have a new CyberPower PR2200 which I'm trying to control using NUT. It has a serial port and I'm connected serially. I am using the cyberpower driver and before a power failure it seems to mostly be working: jeff@backup:~$ upsc cyberpower@localhost battery.charge: 000 driver.name: cyberpower driver.parameter.port: /dev/ttyS0 driver.version: 2.0.4 driver.version.internal: 1.00

I'm looking for people that are using the 'cyberpower' driver that has been available for some years now. It seems the overhauled 'powerpanel' driver could support your UPS too. The commands and status bytes used are identical, the only difference being the way the values read for battery charge, temperature and frequency are interpreted. If we can find a way to detect when to