similar to: git question about disk space

I am migrating the main file servers at work onto a new storage platform based on GPFS. I am using RHEL 5.6 with the samba3x packages (aka 3.5.4) recompiled to get the vfs_gpfs and tsmsm modules, with a couple of extra patches to vfs_gpfs module to bring it 3.5.8 level. It is running with ctdb against Windows AD 2008 R2 domain controllers with all the idmapping been held in the AD. In order to

Since an 'over-quota' or 'disk-full' message is being sent from Samba to the client, it seems obvious that the client _should_ be passing this info. on to the user -- but it isn't. One possible way to get this info. to the client is for Samba to call a shell script similar to the 'preexec' options if quota is exceeded. The script could then invoke smbclient to send a

here at wkdu.org our minds are blown trying to figure out what our problem is, we are using a dell optiplex gx1 with a soundblaster live card. we are getting a nasty hum on the line in. the thing is we plug a cd player directly into the soundcard the hum goes away and when we plug the line in into anything else there is no hum, so the question i ask where is the hum coming from? we are

I was looking over some of my specs. I was thinking that the following: @game.should_receive(:name).and_return(''The Battle for Blaze'') @game.should_receive(:people).and_return(5000000) @game.should_receive(:activated).and_return(true) Would it look cleaner if I could do this instead? @game.should_recieve_and_return( :name => ''The Battle for Blaze''

Hi, is there an option to leave some disk space free? Let's say, don't store new mails if the storage mount point has less than 1% free disk space. What's the way to go? I don't want to restrict each mailbox size. It's just to prevent running out space completely. Thanks! Best regards, Marcel

Hello again, How do I split a data frame into smaller, completely separate data frames (rather than separate data frames comprising a single "list")? Consider the following data, and my coding attempt: x <- read.table(textConnection("id type number indv.1 bagel 6 indv.2 bagel 1 indv.3 donuts 10 indv.4 donuts 9"), header = TRUE) closeAllConnections() x.split <-

Hi, I need to make a quota mechanism to restrict glusterfs space to users. How I proceed? I have an AFR installation with two servers and one NFS reexporter machine working. -- Martin Gumbau - mgumbau at iciq.es Responsable Informatic dels grups teorics de Quimica Computacional del ICIQ

====================================================== "I read part of it all the way through." Samuel Goldwyn ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.4. This release fixes some regressions introduced by the last security fixes. Please see bug

====================================================== "I read part of it all the way through." Samuel Goldwyn ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.4. This release fixes some regressions introduced by the last security fixes. Please see bug

Would someone be so kind as to tell me what the status of debugging symbols (DWARF) generated by clang/llvm is? I am on a linux x86-64 system (Fedora 13). Is gdb supposed to understand the generated DWARF? When I generate an executable with "clang -g" followed by "llc -O0" and feed it to gdb, I get "no debugging symbols found". What is the status of lldb on

On 02/16/2017 12:08 PM, Stephen Canon wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Bagel <bagel99 at gmail.com >> <mailto:bagel99 at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I figured that the optimization of this would bedifficult (else it would >> have already been done :-)) > > Don’t make this assumption. There’s lots of opportunities for optimization > scattered

Assume an architecture that has multiple condition code registers, e.g., powerpc. Now assume that there are predicate instructions like thumb2, but can specify which condition code register they refer to. Now also assume that these predicate instructions themselves are predicatible, if executed they change the current predication state. Can LLVM handle multiple levels of predication? When is

I think I have read that there are plans to generate object code (e.g. ELF) directly in addition to assembly language source. If so, are there plans to support branch relaxation for targets which support long/short branch displacements? This is typically done in assemblers. thanks, bagel

Yes, I know this works peachy keen for char arrays. I'm looking at (which is hard to express in C) something like void foo () { int bar[20] = { 42, 42, ..., 42 }; } I don't want to do a memcopy of the 20 element constant array, and memset doesn't work here. I want an intrinsic that copys the scalar int constant 42 to each element of the int array. bagel On 11/10/2016 03:30

On 12/03/2010 06:28 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > We are working on a document. Here is current draft: > http://wiki.llvm.org/Debug_Information > > - > Devang While this is great news, it doesn't completely satisfy my needs. Your documentation assumes one is going to use the LLVM provided functions (such as DIFactory::). My front-end can't use them because it is not

I'm trying to write a backend for a machine that has both byte and word instructions. Both varieties of instructions operate on the same set of general registers. A byte mode instruction on a general register always clears the upper bits. Register-to-register byte mode and work mode instructions set condition codes based on bytes and words and thus are not interchangeable. Do I need to

On 23 November 2010 18:03, Bagel <bagel99 at gmail.com> wrote: > Would someone be so kind as to tell me what the status of debugging symbols > (DWARF) generated by clang/llvm is? Hi Bagel, It should be fairly complete... > When I generate an executable with "clang -g" followed by "llc -O0" and feed it > to gdb, I get "no debugging symbols found".

Hello, I am using dovecot with mdbox+sis and I notice an ever increasing disk space usage since I converted mailboxes from Maildir to mdboxes. I have checked with a user and while it actually uses only 65K, his mdbox files on disk are more than 6G. The backup of his mailbox is just 64K. Any suggestions ? Below are some relevant commands: [root at mail ~]# doveadm quota get -u test Quota

> On Feb 21, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I believe that providing additional intrinsics that would directly produce the ISD::ADDC/ISD::SUBC nodes would provide the additional advantage of being able to directly produce these nodes for code that doesn't have anything to do with multiprecision addition/subtraction. I am

The thumb2 instructions include unsigned and signed divide. Attached are a patch and test routine. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: div.diff URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091201/675cf4c5/attachment.ksh> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was