Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Moving to ORCv2 - Compiling debuggable code?"
2019 Dec 19
2
Moving to ORCv2 - Compiling debuggable code?
Dear Geoff,
As for as ORCv2 is concerned, there is no event listener facility available
as of now.
Thanks
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 01:21, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> +Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> the author/owner of the ORC JIT - though
> he's out of teh office at the moment I think, so might not get a reply
> until the new year
2019 Dec 20
2
LLJIT vs. thread-local storage
And yet the same C++ code using thread-local variables works fine (or seems
to) when compiled with Orc v1. Does the change to the Orc API really make
thread-local storage more difficult?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 3:52 PM Praveen Velliengiri <
praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, I think Linux don't have support for TLS.
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 20:19, Geoff Levner
2019 Dec 20
4
LLJIT vs. thread-local storage
I am in the process of porting our ORC code to ORC v2 and LLJIT. Now that I
have worked around a problem getting global constructors to be called,
everything seems to work unless a module declares a static thread-local
variable. In that case I get a "JIT session error" saying that the symbol __
emutls_v.xyz was not found (substitute the mangled variable name for "xyz").
Does
2019 Dec 20
2
LLJIT vs. thread-local storage
Argh. Thanks for the info. We're on Linux.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 3:46 PM Praveen Velliengiri <
praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Geoff,
> Gathering from past, I remember that the ORCv2 doesn't support thread
> local variable but not sure what is the current status now. What platform
> you are on?
> CC'ed (Lang hames) he knows exactly what is the
2019 Dec 20
2
LLJIT vs. thread-local storage
Yes, I confirm.
Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 19:12, Praveen Velliengiri <
praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi,
> Orc v2 is different from the internal structure then Orc v1 not just in
> API level.
> TLS support is not in ORC for a long time at least I'm aware of , Could
> you please confirm that ORC v1 actually compiles and run the code with
> Thread locals?
2020 Sep 28
2
LLVM Developers Meeting JIT BoF -- Request for Topics of Interest
Hi Geoff,
We use LLJIT. Do addObjectFile() and StaticLibraryDefinitionGenerator work
> for ELF objects?
They do. :)
I've not tested StaticLibraryDefinitionGenerator extensively on Linux. but
we have a regression test checking basic usage. If you run into any trouble
at all please file a bug and assign it to me.
-- Lang.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 2:05 PM Geoff Levner <glevner at
2019 Dec 19
2
Moving to ORCv2 - Where are my global constructors and destructors?
Heyho,
Recently I tried out the ORCv2 JIT, especially the LLJIT. I gotta say, that I really like the new interface and the way you use it! However there is one thing I'm missing. I wrote a small bit code file, which should force having a global constructor.
int wuff();
__declspec(noinline) int miau()
{
printf("Huhuhu");
return wuff();
}
const int x = miau();
When I
2020 Sep 28
2
LLVM Developers Meeting JIT BoF -- Request for Topics of Interest
Hi Geoff,
Importing symbols into the JIT from an object file or static library...?
Sure! Are you interested in doing this with the C API, LLJIT, or raw OrcV2
components?
The high-level answer here (which we can dig into further in the BoF) is:
For object files:
- For raw OrcV2 components you'll want to create an
RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer or ObjectLinkingLayer and use the 'add'
2019 Dec 20
3
LLJIT vs. thread-local storage
This had also came up at llvm-devmtg briefly at the JIT roundtable. One of
the collaborators on my project had started a patch years ago to implement
some of it https://reviews.llvm.org/D8815, but then we went a different
direction with TLS in our frontend and it became unnecessary.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 12:36 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> +Lang
2020 Oct 06
2
LLVM Developers Meeting JIT BoF -- Request for Topics of Interest
Hi All,
I've listed the current topics of interest below, along with some notes on
each. We only have 30 minutes so we'll barely scratch the surface of these
during the BoF itself. My main aims are for you to meet each other,
identify potential areas of collaboration, identify things that I can do to
unblock you, and get the ball rolling on some conversations that we can
continue on the
2019 Dec 20
3
LLJIT vs. thread-local storage
I don't think it's especially hard, but just not specifically unimplemented
because nobody's had a strong need for it. There's probably some
combinations of code models and machines that does happen to work (e.g.
emutls+linux+large-code+large-data+no-PIC). Julia has some support for
thread locals, but as a JIT in control of the language we currently try to
generate better code than
2020 Oct 02
2
LLVM Developers Meeting JIT BoF -- Request for Topics of Interest
Hi Geoff,
I have only encountered one problem. If a static library has not been
> compiled with -fPIC and uses symbols from a shared library, LLJIT does not
> complain, but the code may crash without warning when it is executed.
Was the static library compiled with large code model too?
I think this is probably a RuntimeDyld bug: It's not great at error
reporting. A few people in the
2020 Oct 02
2
LLVM Developers Meeting JIT BoF -- Request for Topics of Interest
Hi Andres,
That would be of interest to me too. One thing around this I have been
> wondering about is whether it's realistic to merge the optimization and
> code generation phases - right now we spend a lot of time re-doing
> analyses during codegen that we already had done during optimization.
Sounds good to me. I think there are two sub-topics here:
(1) JIT specifics. E.g. What
2020 Aug 07
2
JIT interaction with linkonce_odr global variables
Hello,
I recently hit an issue when JIT'ing my generated IR using
llvm::orc::LLJIT. My IR contains the following definition of a global
variable:
> $_ZZ23TestStaticVarInFunctionbE1x = comdat any
> @_ZZ23TestStaticVarInFunctionbE1x = linkonce_odr dso_local global i32 123,
> comdat, align 4
>
And in my host process, there exists the same symbol. I would expect LLJIT
to resolve the
2020 Nov 17
2
JIT compiling CUDA source code
We have an application that allows the user to compile and execute C++ code
on the fly, using Orc JIT v2, via the LLJIT class. And we would like to
extend it to allow the user to provide CUDA source code as well, for GPU
programming. But I am having a hard time figuring out how to do it.
To JIT compile C++ code, we do basically as follows:
1. call Driver::BuildCompilation(), which returns a
2020 Mar 16
4
ORC JIT Weekly #8: Basic OrcV2 C Bindings, MachO and COFF improvements.
Hi All,
I've added a very basic set of C bindings for OrcV2 in 633ea07200e, with an
example in llvm/example/OrcV2Examples/BasicOrcV2CBindings. Development of
the C APIs is being tracked by http://llvm.org/PR31103 -- if you're
interested in C APIs for OrcV2 please get involved. I would especially
appreciate feedback and patches from C API users: I don't have a use case
for the C APIs
2020 Feb 24
4
ORC JIT Weekly #6 -- General initializer support and JITLink optimizations
Hi All,
The general initializer support patch has landed (see 85fb997659b plus
follow up fixes).
Some quick background:
Until now ORC, like MCJIT, has handled static initializer discovery by
searching for llvm.global_ctors and llvm.global_dtors arrays in the IR
added to the JIT. This approach suffers from several drawbacks:
1) It provides no built-in support for other program representations:
2020 Sep 28
2
LLJIT vs. thread-local storage (again)
Hmm, I'm confused. The DSO is compiled with gcc. Do I need to compile
it with clang instead? I don't believe the JITted code uses the thread
support library directly, although I suppose it may be hidden with
templates and/or inline functions...
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:43 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> If you want to access the variable
2020 Jan 17
6
ORC JIT Weekly #1
Hi All,
In the interests of improving visibility into ORC JIT development I'm going to try writing weekly status updates for the community. I hope they will provide insight into the design and state of development of LLVM's JIT APIs, as well as serving as a convenient space for discussions among LLVM's large and growing community of JIT API users. The
length and detail will vary
2020 Oct 01
2
[Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Please help writing release notes!
Committed to 11.x as b6efbd6b5f22d0a251d2fba9a5d24ac21760b1cc. Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 3:29 AM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> Apologies if I got here too late, but just in case I didn't here are some JIT release notes for 11.0.0:
>
> - LLJIT now supports execution of static inits / deinits via the LLJIT::initialize and