similar to: APC Backups Pro Low Batt

Makes sense, and a PR is a way to solicit feedback :) I'd document this for ups.conf (man page and examples), including a note that for devices which do provide a healthy LB these values may be set to 0 safely. Wondering if non-zero defaults should be there anyway. @Community, WDYT? Also, this critical-state check should be done only when the UPS is on battery (and perhaps not calibrating),

Greetings all I keep getting the message on the console "IPFW pullup failed" I cannot seem to find out what it means or how to correct it any help would be of great help. I'm running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p17 Thank you in advance. Jean M. Vandette ************************************************************************************* *SecureNet Information Services Inc. 100

My $0.02: LB is baked in to nut behavior. So if a UPS doesn't report LB, then it makes sense to synthesize it. Synthetic LB is the cleanest fix at the earlier processing point. One could have a config that is basically synthetic-lowbatt-percent that generates LB if (as Jim says) on battery, not calibrating, and batt% <= that. One could have a similar config

Hello list, we are experimenting with using Dovecot as part of a simplified mail stack with SQL for a internal messaging / notification system for our customers. Sometimes we need to send a message to thousands of customers at once and we do it by having aliases resolve to 10k and 20k+ mail accounts. When we send such a message the server load (obviously) is very high for a few minutes (in case

UPS: http://www.eaton.com/Eaton/ESeriesUPS/DXUPS/index.htm?wtredirect=www.eaton.com/DXUPS I have the same problem on two different computers. The first one is running Ubuntu 12.10 i386 , the second one is running Debian 6.0 x64. Both of them are updated. I tried using different serial cable but the result is the same. The connection to the ups using Windows 7 and Winpower is working fine on

Yes you are right, i realized that just after i sent the email, that it was a bit in haste. anyway, if there is anyway how to optimize dovecot for effective delivery of 20k+ emails within a few minutes, id be glad to know. .. and i will have to ask the same q at postfix mailinglists gnd/ On 7/14/20 8:12 PM, John Stoffel wrote: > > gnd> we are experimenting with using Dovecot as part

Hi everybody, I've got an Unitek iZi UPS 525 with a serial interface. The supplied cable looks fairly simple: RX->RX , TX->TX and GND->GND. Using this cable and Minicom with 2400 8N1 I'm able to issue commands to the UPS using the "Megatec Protocol" http://www.networkupstools.org/protocols/megatec.html so I know the UPS is fairly "intelligent" :-) and the

Hi, after ignoring this for too long (see [1]), I'm still struggling how to shut down servers fed by two independent UPS systems. Both are connected to NUT via the snmp-ups driver with mibs "huawei" and "netvision". However, I fear both do not feature the LB warning via ups.status. We can shut down all less important servers (conencted to a single UPS) via upssched

Hi all, On 5/16/23 20:08, Carsten Aulbert wrote: > Idly browsing the client sources, I guess I could try to add our logic > here[1] and use [2] to gather the battery stats from our UPS and then > decide if this UPS is considered critical or not. But for this, I would > need to dust off/excavate my ancient poor C knowledge ;-). > > I guess I will give this a try unless

Hi Gene, On 5/16/23 21:08, gene heskett wrote: > Take an extra vitamin b1 and start hacking ;o) yeah ;-) > > Seriously, if its that important, do as I did when my last wife was > dying of COPD. :( sorry to hear > Leave your ups setup as is but for under $10k (USD), > have an automatic home sized standby generator installed to run the > important stuff, no room for

Hi all, On 5/19/23 15:11, Greg Troxel wrote: > LB is baked in to nut behavior. So if a UPS doesn't report LB, then > it makes sense to synthesize it. Synthetic LB is the cleanest fix at > the earlier processing point. I fully agree and thus this ought to be done in/near uspd IMHO. I glanced over the server/ directory and was not sure where even to begin hooking this

Hello all, long time away from this list, glad to be around again! I have this Powercom Vanguard VGN VGD-20K31. Some details of this model: * 3-phase input, single phase output * Model has 240V / 12V9AH x 20 x 2SET, plus another set of 20 batteries. All in all, 3 sets * Serial connection to Windows 2k3 server with UPSMon Now I was strongly considering replacing the bundled no-good upsmoon

Dear Daniele, nice to meet you, I'm a collegue of Gabriele. The problem with "blazer_usb" driver ("blazer_ser" works correctly) is related to the following commands: - "F" and "I": when the KRAULER subdriver check these UPS answers it uses wrong constants to check the lenght of the received packets, so these commands are considered as "not

On 5/16/23 14:09, Carsten Aulbert wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On 5/16/23 17:00, Roger Price wrote: >> Hello Carsten, That's what I did but for a much simpler setup. I live >> in an area with a lot of lightning, and my shutdown criteria is to be >> able to shut down repeatedly during an electrical storm.? The NOTIFY >> and CMDSCRIPT and the upssched-cmd logic are

Hi, I've being using nut 2.2.2 (Debian Lenny) via megatec_usb driver for IPPON Back UPS 600. Then I upgraded to nut 2.4.3 (Debian Squeeze) with broken megatec_usb. I moved to blazer_usb, it connected IPPON. [myups] driver = blazer_usb port = /dev/usb/hiddev0 desc = "Local UPS" #from megatec.c: batteries[] = {{ 12.0, 9.0, 16.0, 9.7, 13.7, 0.0 },

Hmm, looking at status_commit(), if the UPS actually reported just ?OB", but the ?ignorelb? logic kicked in, wouldn?t status_commit() change it to ?OB LB?? And would clients interpret that correctly? And, assuming status_commit() is called, is the status so saved what?s returned on a future client query? I?m really unsure how all of this works. I don?t suppose there?s some kind of ?general

Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert at aei.mpg.de> writes: > Hi all, > > On 5/19/23 15:11, Greg Troxel wrote: >> LB is baked in to nut behavior. So if a UPS doesn't report LB, then >> it makes sense to synthesize it. Synthetic LB is the cleanest fix at >> the earlier processing point. > > I fully agree and thus this ought to be done in/near uspd

While the rest of you were chatting about the smallest * server, I was sitting her staring at the telephone hanging on the wall. It is a Western Electric set in a varnished pine box with an earpiece you hold in your left hand and a mouthpiece attached to the box. You crank the magneto with your right hand to signal the switchboard. The two dry cells inside are dated 1935, and I'm

Hi Roger, On 5/16/23 17:00, Roger Price wrote: > Hello Carsten, That's what I did but for a much simpler setup. I live in > an area with a lot of lightning, and my shutdown criteria is to be able > to shut down repeatedly during an electrical storm.? The NOTIFY and > CMDSCRIPT and the upssched-cmd logic are written up in detail in chapter > 7 of

Hi again, On 5/22/23 18:31, Willcox David via Nut-upsuser wrote: > Hmm. Is there maybe something there already that will do this? Maybe > kind of back-handed. > > In drivers/dstate.c, I see: > > 1. In status_init(), if ?driver.flag.ignorelb? is set in the driver > state, the ?ignorelb? flag is set. > 2. In status_set(), if ignorelb is set, and the status being set