similar to: ELF string table access in backend

The "duplicate" test was removed because not working in this particular case, I already read the RFC but I didn't find anything useful for our case. I'll try replacing `if true` with `if not duplicate` into sieve script and I'll post back the result. The "true" check is used to enable the out of office rule, otherwise we use "if false # true" to

On 2019-11-27, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > applied, thanks. Surprised the fairly aggressive set of -W flags we use > by default didn't catch this... This can be caught with -Wpedantic, which seems to catch a few more instances of this, as well as passing non-void pointers to printf for the `%p` format specifier. Patches attached for these. However, it also catches

This is not valid in ISO C. --- ssh-sk.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ssh-sk.c b/ssh-sk.c index 2b25c42f..3d6ac3d0 100644 --- a/ssh-sk.c +++ b/ssh-sk.c @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ sshsk_free_enroll_response(struct sk_enroll_response *r) freezero(r->signature, r->signature_len); freezero(r->attestation_cert, r->attestation_cert_len); freezero(r,

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:22 PM Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > On 21.11.2019 23.57, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote: > > Is it possible to configure a network for a cert instead of an ip? > > > > Something like this: > > > > local 192.0.2.0 { > > ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/dovecot/imap-02.example.com.cert.pem > >

Hi All, A self-follow up and rephrase of my previous question with updated subject: What I want to do is to analyze hand-written assembly code with 'full details' where semantics of each instruction can be known in LLVM passes. Many of such instructions have no corresponding counterparts in IR/MIR forms, such as 'syscall' 'iret', etc. At MC level, such assembly code can

Hi everyone, we have a duplicate e-mail problem with Dovecot 2.2.13 (LMTP as MDA) on a Debian 8 server. Our users are on external LDAP. We just need to setup a vacation responder (with Sieve) for our employees with a redirect to an alias (a distribution list), let's call it /LIST at domain.com/, that comprehends even the user that just activated the out of office. This generates a

> The "true" check is used to enable the out of office rule, otherwise we use "if false # true" to disable it. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20191127/12937143/attachment.html>

Is it possible to configure a network for a cert instead of an ip? Something like this: local 192.0.2.0 { ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/dovecot/imap-02.example.com.cert.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/dovecot/imap-02.example.com.key.pem } Or local 192.0.2.0/24 { ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/dovecot/imap-02.example.com.cert.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/dovecot/imap-02.example.com.key.pem }

======================================================== "Success is simply a matter of luck. Ask any failure." Earl Wilson ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is an additional bug fix release to address bug #14175 (CTDB: Incoming queue can be orphaned causing communication breakdown). Please see

======================================================== "Success is simply a matter of luck. Ask any failure." Earl Wilson ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is an additional bug fix release to address bug #14175 (CTDB: Incoming queue can be orphaned causing communication breakdown). Please see

Hi, I'm working on enabling thinLTO for our custom backend on LLVM-8 with lld to get code size benefits from dead symbol elimination. The code in LTO::run() of LTO.cpp confuses me that, even though thinLTO is specified, runRegularLTO() will be run first and its return value determines whether runThinLTO() will be executed. My question is if it's clearly known that thinLTO is used, is it

I want to know all the optimization applied by the passes. I found two options in clang 1. -fsave-optimization-record 2. -Rpass-analysis=... However, they have nothing to do with the interaction btw IR files(.ll) Is there any tool that records all optimizations on IR file? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 11/27/19 2:10 AM, Eli Friedman via llvm-dev wrote: The shuffle mask of a shufflevector is special: it's required to be a constant in a specific form. From LangRef: "The shuffle mask operand is required to be a constant vector with either constant integer or undef values." So really, we can resolve this any way we want; "undef" in this context doesn't have to mean

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:31 AM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > On 27/11/2019 21:28 Mark Moseley via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:22 PM Aki Tuomi via dovecot < > dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 21.11.2019 23.57, Marc Roos via dovecot

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 06:10:36PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > Hey-this is almost certainly not the right place in this thread to respond, > but this thread has gotten so deep evolution can't push the subject further to > the right, heh. So I'll just respond here. :) > I've been following this and helping out Karol with testing here and there. > They had me test

Hello all, I'm implementing a watermarking feature for lld that computes a hash of loadable segments and places the result in a note section. Ongoing work can be found here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70316 https://reviews.llvm.org/D66426 The purpose of this watermark is to enable detection of post-link modifications to the loadable segments of the binary. Such modifications may produce a

On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 12:51 +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:49 PM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 06:10:36PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > Hey-this is almost certainly not the right place in this thread to > > > respond, > > > but this thread has gotten so deep evolution

Llvm-mctoll will raise a binary back to LLVM IR. Not exactly what you want but it might be something you can leverage. https://github.com/microsoft/llvm-mctoll On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:19 PM Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 3:37 AM Lele Ma via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > My goal is to write

Ok, makes sense. My suggestion is that we patch the IR Verifier to ensure that the mask is indeed a vector of constants and/or undefs. Right now it only runs the standard checks for instructions. We will also run Alive2 on the test suite to make sure undef is never replaced in practice. Thanks, Nuno -----Original Message----- From: Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> Sent: 27 de

Hi llvm-dev, I've uploaded a prototype patch at https://reviews.llvm.org/D70720 which adds a new feature to llvm-objdump: displaying the location (in registers/memory/etc) of source-level variables alongside the disassembly display. I've put a demo of the output at https://reviews.llvm.org/M2. I have two use-cases in mind for this: * Users reading the disassembly of compiled code. It