similar to: debug build busts memory

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:31 AM David Jones via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Throw hardware at it. > While I agree that this is good advice with the current state of affairs, I don't think we should consider the current situation acceptable. LLVM has a lot of knobs that Tim alluded to, but first time users shouldn't have to search for them to get a

James A. Peltier <jpeltier at sfu.ca> wrote: > While I can't assure you that upgrading to 7 will fix the problem, > the likeliness that will work is at least 50% better being as 7 is > based on a newer kernel. I've installed CentOS 7 with the latest kernel from elrepo (4.11.8), and I can't get Grub to install. I think I'll have to conclude that it really

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Tom Stellard > via llvm-dev > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 7:49 PM > To: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama at gmail.com> > Cc: Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD issue on a massively parallel build machine >

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:35 AM Itaru Kitayama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Setting LLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS > did not help a week or two weeks ago’s lld. > > But recent commits to lld might reflect the variable correctly. > FYI: the variable has nothing to do with lld itself (not commits to lld would change the behavior of this flag), as far as I know

I have table "decks" with three fields: "id", "created_at" and "cards" which is a 264-character string field. I have modified the model with a constructor, as follows: class Deck < ActiveRecord::Base attr_reader :cards def initialize @cards = "12345" end end If I call Deck.new from my controller, I get no errors and an object with the

Hi folks, I am able to install workstation successfully on a dedicated SSD w/ GPT partition w/ UEFI boot using the latest `CentOS-8.2.2004-x86_64-dvd1.iso` from a bootable pen drive. The motherboard is ASRock x570 Gaming 4 ( https://www.asrock.com/mb/AMD/X570%20phantom%20Gaming%204/index.asp) w/ Ryzen 3600, 16G RAM, 1TB SSD in question. However, after login, when I do a DNF update (which is

I was looking over some of my specs. I was thinking that the following: @game.should_receive(:name).and_return(''The Battle for Blaze'') @game.should_receive(:people).and_return(5000000) @game.should_receive(:activated).and_return(true) Would it look cleaner if I could do this instead? @game.should_recieve_and_return( :name => ''The Battle for Blaze''

Hello again, How do I split a data frame into smaller, completely separate data frames (rather than separate data frames comprising a single "list")? Consider the following data, and my coding attempt: x <- read.table(textConnection("id type number indv.1 bagel 6 indv.2 bagel 1 indv.3 donuts 10 indv.4 donuts 9"), header = TRUE) closeAllConnections() x.split <-

Hey all, I'm relatively new to the R-environment. I'm having a bit of trouble with encapsulation. I have a globally declared variable that doesn't update it when I change it in a function. For example when I run the following function >deckn<-NULL >deck1<-1 #52 card deck >deck<-function() { #Creating a standard deck deck1<-c(1:52) deckn<-deck1 #Creating n

I have a Deck object and a Card object with their corresponding tables. (You know a deck of cards.) When I destory a Deck it leaves orphaned cards in the database. Is there a way to set up the objects with ActiveRecord so that when a parent object is destoryed the child objects are destroyed as well? My code below. class Deck < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :cards end class Card <

Hi all, just joined and have only just kicked off with Rails (coming, but not departing, from WebObjects development). And so far there seems to be a lot of promise except for one thing I can''t figure out as yet -- the above problem. Say I have the following conceptual relationships: ITEMS <<--->> CARTS i.e., each item can belong to one or more categories. So really

Hi there, I''ve got installed ajax_scaffold_generator (3.1.2, 2.2.1) Anyway I''m following the example here <http://height1percent.com/ articles/2006/04/18/ajaxscaffold-3-1-0-released> which suggests the following in a model file: -------------------------------------------------------- require ''ajax_scaffold'' class Pet < ActiveRecord::Base

Would someone be so kind as to tell me what the status of debugging symbols (DWARF) generated by clang/llvm is? I am on a linux x86-64 system (Fedora 13). Is gdb supposed to understand the generated DWARF? When I generate an executable with "clang -g" followed by "llc -O0" and feed it to gdb, I get "no debugging symbols found". What is the status of lldb on

On 02/16/2017 12:08 PM, Stephen Canon wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Bagel <bagel99 at gmail.com >> <mailto:bagel99 at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I figured that the optimization of this would bedifficult (else it would >> have already been done :-)) > > Don’t make this assumption. There’s lots of opportunities for optimization > scattered

Assume an architecture that has multiple condition code registers, e.g., powerpc. Now assume that there are predicate instructions like thumb2, but can specify which condition code register they refer to. Now also assume that these predicate instructions themselves are predicatible, if executed they change the current predication state. Can LLVM handle multiple levels of predication? When is

I think I have read that there are plans to generate object code (e.g. ELF) directly in addition to assembly language source. If so, are there plans to support branch relaxation for targets which support long/short branch displacements? This is typically done in assemblers. thanks, bagel

Yes, I know this works peachy keen for char arrays. I'm looking at (which is hard to express in C) something like void foo () { int bar[20] = { 42, 42, ..., 42 }; } I don't want to do a memcopy of the 20 element constant array, and memset doesn't work here. I want an intrinsic that copys the scalar int constant 42 to each element of the int array. bagel On 11/10/2016 03:30

Hello, I have been struglling with sysinstall, attempting to make it handle the geometry of some large SATA drives. After a lot of effort I decided to stop suffering and modified the program in order to circumvent the outdated limit of 65535 cylinders (see attached patch). I'm thinking about submitting a PR with a change request but I'd like to get some additional opinions first. I did

On 12/03/2010 06:28 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > We are working on a document. Here is current draft: > http://wiki.llvm.org/Debug_Information > > - > Devang While this is great news, it doesn't completely satisfy my needs. Your documentation assumes one is going to use the LLVM provided functions (such as DIFactory::). My front-end can't use them because it is not

Unfortunately, from personal experience, LLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS appears to have no effect for Visual Studio builds, AND some of the tools linked can take up several GB of RAM, so you'll end up with paging issues. I ended up getting a RAM upgrade in order to sensibly build it (note, I think builds with debug information take more memory than those that don't, and also the clang projects