similar to: Updated polling logic in LockFileManager

Well, Yes. There are a few differences with the https://reviews.llvm.org/D70563 solution. First of all, in D70563, in case if file will be deleted between `open` and subscription to events, then there'll be maximum timeout. it seems that kqueue is not validating file descriptor, so, in case if file descriptor is already invalid, listening for a kqueue won't give any errors. It will just

2017-05-26 17:47 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Changing a header file somewhere and having to spend 10 minutes waiting > for a build leads to a lot of wasted developer time. > > The real culprit here is tablegen. Can we split support and ADT into two > - the parts that tablegen depends on and the parts that it doesn't? >

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:25 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:54 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2017-05-26 17:47 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >> >>> Changing a header file somewhere and having to

2017-05-29 9:25 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>: > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:54 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2017-05-26 17:47 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >> >>> Changing a header file somewhere and having to spend 10 minutes waiting

Greetings All, I've already mentioned this on the GCC side but it seems that the Yocto Project has a class for testing upstream projects. The project is used for building embedded distributions but due to the ability with bitbake and the amount of supported upstream projects I've asked them to mention that other projects are interested in seeing this happen at the usual Embedded

On 11/22/19 2:46 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > Sorry, I'm not sure I follow/understand your email, or what sort of > replies/responses/discussion you're hoping to get from it - perhaps > you could rephrase and/or provide more detail? David, Sorry its more to give you guys a heads up in case they ask about it being of interest and know that its something of interest outside that

Hi, With multiple proposals to improve the situation for newcomers in flight, let me add another brief proposal: Let’s add a CONTRIBUTING.md file to the top-level directory of llvm-project. I think this would make the information about how to contribute more visible and Github uses CONTRIBUTING.md to display ‘Contributing Guidelines’ at a few places, like when creating new issues or pull

Hi, I own a UPS HP T750. Is there a driver for this UPS (either serial or USB)? thx kp

Just saw this: ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: ansible noarch 2.9.1-2.el7 ovirt-4.3-centos-ovirt43 17 M which seems new. No longer pulling ansible from

Hello again LLVM-Mailinglist, This time I have no technical question however... Personally I'm a big fan of the LLVM, the concept behind it - as far as I understood it - and your work in general. I use the LLVM to develop various JIT applications that load the LLVM bytecode files under Windows - my many many questions are usually about this subject. Still after a year I feel like being a

Hi all, I have a global array declared as: table = internal constant [8 x [256 x i32]] ... At the moment I'm able to get the reference to table using Constant* g_var = cast<GlobalVariable>(I.getOperand(0))->getInitializer(); ( please consider I to be a GetElementPtrInst object ). Now I would like to understand how to get the address of table[2][3], for instance, considering that I

Hi Folks, I am building LLVM 3.9.1 using the Yocto build system for a cross build. The compiled bins/libs work totally fine on the target machine however there seems to be an intermittent race condition during the build which causes a build failure. On the failed builds I usually see things being linking/compiling twice e.g. Linking CXX static library ../libLLVMSupport.a cd

Ok, thank you, I will implement it then. As far as I see this optimization should be done in AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer, is it right? From: Eli Friedman [mailto:efriedma at quicinc.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 11:55 PM To: Kosov Pavel <kosov.pavel at huawei.com>; LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] [ARM] Peephole optimization ( instructions tst +

Hi Tim, Thank you very much for the message. It indeed solved the problem. Thanks On Fri, Nov 8, 2019, 15:05 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alberto, > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 06:59, Alberto Barbaro via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Is there any way for avoiding to use llvm.dbg.value within a bc file? > >

Hello! I noticed that in some cases clang generates sequence of AND+TST instructions: For example: AND x3, x2, x1 TST x2, x1 I think these instructions should be merged to one: ANDS x3, x2, x1 ( because TST <Xn>, <Xm> is alias for ANDS XZR, <Xn>, <Xm> -

Hi everyone, In the reviewing system, after a patch is approved, what should be the following step? I assume I'll have to make sure the patch hasn't broken anything, before pushing it, so I'll wan't to run a full build+tests, probably in a remote sterile environment (like a jenkins server). Do we have an integration system like this? Or should I just trust the build+tests on my

> On Nov 21, 2019, at 14:23, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Some years ago there was a random-nop-insertion pass (for ROP gadget removal) proposed, which didn't stick; we recently had a summer intern work on it but did not get to proper quality; I'd like to revive that. Hi Paul, I'm curious about what the use case for this was. In

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:59:48AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 09:34:58AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > Ideas for long-term changes below. > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> > > > > Thanks for reviewing!

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:59:48AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 09:34:58AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > Ideas for long-term changes below. > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> > > > > Thanks for reviewing!

I finally fixed my drive error problem. This has been going on quite a while. I've posted before with no success on getting this fixed. I was getting these errors. Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } And now for the amazing smartctl -a