similar to: [Clang] memory allocation

Thanks David for your reply! However, OK is called inside nqueens. So, the same stack space cannot be used/reused for both of them. Best, Mohammad On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:43 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > You printed &j and &solutions - did you mean to print 'solutions' instead > of '&solutions' Because 'solutions' and

Thanks, Max. Yes, of course, you are right, and I am an idiot because I was tired and putting underscores before the variable name when I read it back! Then I forgot to post the followup email to say I had figured it out. Now, this SHARED was not something I was aware of, but looked like an ideal solution to passing variables BACK from to the parent channel. However, it does not seem to be very

Thanks, Richard - your code does indeed work reliably 100% of the time, and thank you for that explanation. I do think the docs at https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+14+Function_SHARED could do with more clarification. BTW, there were a couple of typos in your code, so for anyone who wants to copy/paste, here's Richard's code WITH the curly braces (

Hi, I have a page were users can start jobs that may take several hours to run. BackgrounDrb is perfect for me and seems to be working well most of the time but some times I have the following problem: My worker is set up like this: class UploadWorker < BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker set_worker_name :upload_worker set_no_auto_load(true) def create(args = nil ) file = args[:file]

I'm writing a pass that eliminates some variables. To show the effect of the pass i need to show that I deleted the variables that originally appear in the user code, not temporary variables added by llvm. On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Norouzi via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at

Hi, I need to check if a variable belongs to the program originally. Consider the following code line: y = x + 4 and its corresponding llvm ir (roughly): %16 = load i32 %x %add = add i32 %16, i32 4 store i32 %add, %y I need to distinguish between %16, %add and %x, %y. Any help is appreciated. Best, Mohammad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Sorry i'm using the following code: F = (cast<CallInst>(BI))->getCalledFunction(); for (auto& A : F->getArgumentList()) { errs() << "------- " << A.getName() << " " << "11" << "\n"; } But how can I get the parameters (as e and f in the example)? Thank you and best, Mo On

Related to http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2016-November/290384.html, at the moment I'm passing one variable via DIAL. Now I'd like to pass a whole bunch, and my idea was to rather than having a great string of b(synctest3b^setVar^1(something)^2(more things)^3(etc)) and then get them with ARG1..ARGn etc, I could bundle the whole lot into a HASH and then unbundle them at

what about the memory address of e and f? can i get them? Thank you and best, Mo On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On 10 March 2017 at 15:49, Mohammad Norouzi <mnmomn at gmail.com> wrote: > > for (auto& A : cast<CallInst>(BI)->arg_operands()) > > errs() << "--- " << A->getName()

I tried the original posted code again: for (auto& A : cast<CallInst>(BI)->arg_operands()) errs() << "--- " << A->getName() << "\n"; but it prints empty (only ---)! Thank you and best, Mo On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On 10 March 2017 at 15:41, Mohammad Norouzi <mnmomn at

Hi, Do address spaces in llvm corespond to different memory locations? For example, Shared and Global refer to RAM while Local refers to registers? I guess that this may be true in GPU programming. So, I would like to know about CPUs. Thanks. Best, Mohammad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Is it possible to get debug information after optimization? for example, source code line numbers of instructions in an ir that is optimized by O2? Best, Mohammad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160303/af4f46a7/attachment.html>

Hi all, How can i find the instruction that uses the result of a load instruction. For example: %16 = load i32, i32* %ptr %add = add i32 4, %16 In this case, i would like to get the add instruction. Best, Mo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160204/bdef6f63/attachment.html>

Hi Everyone, Does anyone know to get function parameters? For example, I want to get e and f in the call to function foo in the following code: foo(inr a , int b){ .... } main() { int e,f; e=10; f=22; *foo(e,f);* } I use the following code: for (auto& A : (cast<CallInst>(BI))->arg_operands ()) errs() << A.dump(); but I get a and b instead. Thank you

Hi Steven- Nice, but will this not break Windows? From an initial glance over your patch, it seems to assume the existence of mmap() in some form or other. Alistair On 8 Aug 2010, at 03:05, Steven Noonan wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been doing work on memory reduction in Unladen Swallow, and > during testing, LiveRanges seemed to be consuming one of the largest > chunks of

Hi folks, I've been doing work on memory reduction in Unladen Swallow, and during testing, LiveRanges seemed to be consuming one of the largest chunks of memory. I wrote a replacement allocator for use by BumpPtrAllocator which uses mmap()/munmap() in place of malloc()/free(). It has worked flawlessly in testing, and reduces memory usage quite nicely in Unladen Swallow. The code is available

I''ve been hacking on this for awhile and am not even getting close. Consider the following... results = Sample.find(:all) total_counter = results.each{|result| #Add together result.counter} I just want to simply iterate through the list and sum the counter field for each row into an aggregation. I could do it in a full for loop, but is there a nice one liner I''m missing?

On 23 Mar 2016, at 11:35, Mohammad Norouzi <mnmomn at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:43 AM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > Address spaces in LLVM are an abstract concept and LLVM attaches no internal meaning to address spaces, apart from: > > - Location 0 in address space 0 is

For our platforms, we'd like to embed several different userland scripts / programs that are executed before we have mounted the root filesystem as part of the initramfs payload. Specifically, I'd like to have multiple scripts executed before do_mounts(), so I coded up this simple do_initscripts function that executes all executables found in /etc/init.d in alphabetically sorted order. I

> Hi, > > I need to check if a variable belongs to the program originally. Consider > the following code line: > > y = x + 4 > > and its corresponding llvm ir (roughly): > > %16 = load i32 %x > %add = add i32 %16, i32 4 > store i32 %add, %y > > I need to distinguish between %16, %add and %x, %y. > > > You might be able to use the Debug information