similar to: RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it"

2019 Dec 26
2
[Job Ad]Alibaba Group is hiring deep learning compiler engineers
Hi, I’m writing this email behalf of my manager in Alibaba. Our team is working on a deep learning engine called MNN. We open sourced it this May. (Github link here: https://github.com/alibaba/MNN ). It has industry-leading blazing fast inference speed on mobile and it is tiny in size. In the internal experiments we ran, MNN outperforms other inference engines under almost all settings by
2002 Dec 05
1
swat not working this time
Hi again, I've just reinstalled RH 7.2 and Samba 2.2.7 for the unpteenth time.... this time swat is not working !!! I have checked the etc/services file and swat 901/tcp is in there and I have a text file named swat in etc/xinetd.d directory containing the following... service swat { port = 901 socket_type = stream wait = no user = root server = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat log_on_failure
2013 Sep 23
1
xen does not work with amd64 kernel but works with 686
Hello, I have problems running Xen (from Debian 7, i386 userspace) on Asus P3-AE5 system (M2V-TVM board) with Athlon 64 3000+ CPU (AM2, 1.8GHz). In short, Xen is not accessible from amd64 Linux kernels but works fine with 686 kernels. Long version: xen-system-i386 (4.1.4-3+deb7u1) works fine with linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae xen-system-amd64 (4.1.4-3+deb7u1) works fine with
2019 Oct 24
4
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
On 24/10/2019 14:21, JF Bastien via llvm-dev wrote: > I’d like to understand what programming model you see programmers using. > You don’t need 257 bits per byte if you only offer 257 bit integers. > Rather, bytes aren’t really a thing at that point. LLVM kinda handles iN > already, and your backend would legalize everything to exactly this type > and nothing else, right? Would
2019 Nov 01
2
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 3:41 AM, Dmitriy Borisenkov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > A summary of the discussion so far. > > It seems that there are two possible solutions on how to move forward with non 8 bits byte: > > 1. Commit changes without tests. Chris Lattner, Mikael Holmen, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Jesper Antonsson support this idea. > James Y
2019 May 02
12
RFC: On removing magic numbers assuming 8-bit bytes
A. This RFC outlines a proposal regarding non-8-bit-byte support that got positive reception at a Round Table at EuroLLVM19. The general topic has been brought up several times before and one good overview can be found in a FOSDEM 2017 presentation by Jones and Cook: https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/llvm_16_bit/ In a nutshell, the proposal is for the llvm community
2019 Nov 19
2
Question about physical registers in ISel
To get into more detail, I'm trying to update WebAssembly's `call` instruction. `call` is currently constrained to return one or zero arguments, so in TableGen we have a separate call Instruction for each possible return type. But I need to update calls to return arbitrarily many values of any combination of WebAssembly types, so even if we imposed some reasonable artificial limit like 8
2017 Jan 20
4
16-bit bytes for AsmPrinter/DWARF
Hi, I'm with a team using 16-bit bytes for an out-of-tree target. The AsmPrinter framework's implementation of the DWARF debugging format is not very good at distinguishing between target-sized bytes (which is the more common use) and 8-bit-bytes. The DWARF standard itself seems not very good in this regard, actually. So we have had to hack our way around this. I.e., at some call-sites of
2019 Oct 31
5
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 15:30 -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2019, at 3:07 AM, Jeroen Dobbelaere via llvm-dev < > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of JF > > > Bastien via > > > > [..] > > > Is it relevant to any modern compiler
2019 Nov 04
3
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 12:45 AM Jorg Brown via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:40 AM Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > On Nov 1, 2019, at 3:41 AM, Dmitriy Borisenkov via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > It seems that there are two possible
2019 May 03
2
RFC: On removing magic numbers assuming 8-bit bytes
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 19:54 +0200, Pavel Šnobl wrote: > Hi Jesper, > > thank you for working on this. My company (Codasip) would definitely > be interested in having this feature upstream. I think that this is > actually important for a suprisingly large number of people who > currently have to maintain their changes downstream. I have a couple > of questions and comments:
2019 Nov 20
2
Question about physical registers in ISel
Can you elaborate on the fix you are thinking of? I'm not sure what you're thinking should change. On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:51 PM Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > It sounds to me that we should fix SDISel to accept both physical and > virtual definitions on variadic instructions. Though I wouldn’t bother > adding the support for implicit virtual
2007 Mar 09
4
mail archive
I'd like to download a complete mail archive so that I can browse for problems concerning Mulberry. Is this possible, or can I only get them in monthly gulps? Cheers, Terry. --
2012 Oct 04
1
Error in installing package wordcloud in R
Dear Sir, I faced problem during the installation of wordcloud package in R -2.15 . I have mentioned the error below. After selecting the cran mirror it shows the error. I will be thankful for your response to this solution. Error Selection: 34 Warning: unable to access index for repository http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/cran/src/contrib Error in apply(available[p1, dependencies, drop = FALSE], 1L,
2019 Nov 05
3
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:00 PM James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > To throw my hat into the ring, we also maintain a downstream target that > has a subset of this problem - it has non-8-bit-addressable memory. This > means that %uglygeps don't work, pointers can't be casted to i8* and expect > to be byte-addressed (conversions to
2009 Oct 22
2
CentOS-5.4 Update?
hdwr HPQ DC7700S ix86 Core Duo I have just updated this CentOS-5.3 box to 5.4. This process was not satisfactory. While the update packages all downloaded without problem the update process itself stalled at several points. By stalled I mean that at some point the entire process stopped for hours. The packages at which it stalled included evince, evolution, totem and vinfo. There may have
2007 Nov 23
3
call model method out of the controller => undefined method
Hi, I''m a newby and I fight with the Rails convention - i think so. I''ve done little tools and scripts in Ruby before. I''ve successfully uploaded a textfile. And now i want to extract some filecontent to pass it into a database. My Problem: I can not start a given method of a given Model (=> Metadata.extract_content(fileuri)). The error message ''undefined
2017 Mar 15
1
Mail restore and single storage attachement
Bonjour, I'm finishing the upgrade of an old installation of Dovecot/postfix mail system for my lab. In the configuration i plan ( dovecot 2.2.27 ), i choose to use: - mdbox format - single storage for attachements - 2 zfs file systems, one for mdboxes, the other for attachments The last tests before production concern my hability to restore a lost mail (or mailbox) ... (lot of
2020 Oct 01
0
Invitation to register for the Think with Terra Blockchain Tech Talk
Hi, there! I?m Suzana Joel from Lumos Labs. I?d like to invite you to attend the Think with Terra Tech Talk - Back to Blockchain Basics, that?s scheduled to take place on *Monday, 5 October at 5:30 p.m. IST. * The Tech Talk will feature three sessions to help anyone get a working understanding of - - blockchain technology, - Smart Contracts, - Building on the Terra
2011 Oct 19
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Ok, wow that wasn't hard at all. Awesome ;-) > This is still *very* much a rough draft, but it's probably better to review that the previous patch. One big caveat, I know I have an iteration bug in here somewhere that is inf-looping. Just ran out of steam debugging it, will pick it back up again later today to shake it out.