Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Static assert fails when compiler for i386"
2019 Aug 03
3
conflicting builtins in clang with musl (stddef.h)
Hello there,
I'm building a Linux distribution based on musl and LLVM as default
toolchain (including lld/libc++/libc++abi/libunwind rather than GNU).
For most of the time this works pretty well.
However I'm having troubles with few packages, webkit for instance
fails because of max_align_t being redeclared in musl's stddef.h
I see that stddef.h is provided by both musl and in the
2014 May 15
3
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the three
> > fixes or at least merging them to the 3.4 branch?
>
> I've pushed the two approved patches to the 3.4 branch, can you
> verify that they work with gcc
2014 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
Using gcc 4.9 to build the llvm 3.4 branch fails with the following error:
llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Release build
[...]
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/../../../../include/c++/4.9.0/cstddef:51:11:
error: no member named 'max_align_t' in the global namespace
using ::max_align_t;
~~^
gcc 4.8.2's caused no such issue, so it must be a change in
2014 May 15
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 15/05/2014 22:12, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:38:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>>> Tom,
>>>>
>>>> now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the three
>>>> fixes
2014 Apr 29
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 4/29/14, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2014.04.29 at 12:16 +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 4/29/14, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2014.04.29 at 11:04 +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > > On 4/27/14, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > On 2014.04.27 at 16:18 +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > > > > Using gcc 4.9 to build the llvm
2014 May 05
3
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 04/05/2014 02:30, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Alp Toker wrote:
>> On 02/05/2014 20:45, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>> Bump.
>>>
>>> Is it really unsupported to build llvm from scratch with gcc 4.9 and
>>> libstdc++ 4.9? Should I file a bugzilla ticket instead?
>> Obviously LLVM/clang should compile out of the box
2014 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:
>
>> I suspect that pulling in clang header fixes r201729, r202911 and r207606
>> to 3.4.1 will resolve libstdc++ / glibc compatibility issues people have
>> been having with 3.4:
>>
>> r201729:
2003 Apr 02
1
RODBC sqlSave problem.
Dear list,
Being new to both the postgres database, ODBC and the RODBC interface, I
am somewhat confused by some of the problems I am experiencing trying to
connect R to the database.
Whai I am trying is basically the example part of the help file for the
sqlSave function:
> library(RODBC)
> odbcConnect("theodor") -> channel
> data(USArrests)
> sqlSave(channel,
2017 Jan 20
1
How to handle INT8 data
Right, they are identifiers.
Storing them as String has drawbacks:
- huge to store in memory
- slow to process
- huge to index (by eg data.table columns indexes)
Why not storing them as numeric ?
Thanks,
Le 20 janv. 2017 ? 18h16, William Dunlap ?crivait :
> If these are identifiers, store them as strings. If not, what sort of
> calculations do you plan on doing with them?
> Bill
2017 Jan 20
9
How to handle INT8 data
Hello r users,
I have to deal with int8 data with R. AFAIK R does only handle int4
with `as.integer` function [1]. I wonder:
1. what is the better approach to handle int8 ? `as.character` ?
`as.numeric` ?
2. is there any plan to handle int8 in the future ? As you might know,
int4 is to small to deal with earth population right now.
Thanks for you ideas,
int8 eg:
human_id
2014 May 06
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:42:28PM +0100, Alp Toker wrote:
>
> On 05/05/2014 20:51, Richard Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Chandler Carruth
> > <chandlerc at google.com <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com
> > <mailto:alp at nuanti.com>>
2010 Aug 10
2
[LLVMdev] Overflow trap
After chatting on IRC, Peter wants a very specific interrupt (int4 on x86). I suggested he add a new llvm.x86.int(i32) intrinsic, and use the existing branch on llvm.sadd.with.overflow intrinsic. The x86 backend can then turn jo+int4 into into when reasonable.
-Chris
On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Peter S. Housel wrote:
>
>>
2017 Jan 20
4
How to handle INT8 data
Well I definitely cannot use them as numeric because join is the main
reason of those identifiers.
About int64 and bit64 packages, it's not a solution, because I am
releasing a dataset for external users. I cannot ask them to install a
package in order to exploit them.
I have to be very carefull when releasing the data. If a user just use
read.csv functions, they by default cast the
2017 Jan 13
4
Wrong code bug after GVN/PRE?
Hi,
I've stumbled upon a case where I think gvn does a bad (wrong)
optimization. It's a bit messy to debug though so I'm not sure if I
should just write a PR about it a let someone who knows the code look at
it instead.
Anyway, for the bug to trigger I need to run the following passes in the
same opt invocation:
-sroa -instcombine -simplifycfg -instcombine -gvn
The problem
2017 Jan 20
2
How to handle INT8 data
Hi,
I do have < INT_MAX.
This looks attractive but since they are unique identifiers, storing
them as factor will be likely to be counter-productive. (a string
version + an int32 for each)
I was looking to https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/csvread/index.html
This looks like a good feet for my needs.
Any chances such an external package for int64 would be integrated in core ?
Le 20
2013 Aug 20
2
[LLVMdev] Failure to optimize vector select
Hi,
I've found a case I would expect would optimize easily, but it doesn't. A simple implementation of vector select:
float4 simple_select(float4 a, float4 b, int4 c)
{
float4 result;
result.x = c.x ? a.x : b.x;
result.y = c.y ? a.y : b.y;
result.z = c.z ? a.z : b.z;
result.w = c.w ? a.w : b.w;
return result;
}
I would expect this would be optimized to
%bool
2014 Nov 06
1
limit of cmdscale function
Hi
We have a few questions regarding the use of the "isoMDS" function.
When we run "isoMDS" function using 60,000 x 60,000 data matrix,
we get the following error message:
------------------------------------
cmdscale(d, k) : invalid value of 'n'
Calls: isoMDS -> cmdscale
------------------------------------
We checked the source code of "cmdscale" and
2009 Dec 17
1
Problem reading binaries created with fortran (More infos)
The structure of the file is clear (see below) the first line is made of
integers and doubles with the fifth being a text string followed by arrays
of double precision number.:
int1 int2 double1 double2 text int3 int4 int5
(array of double)
here is an example of file:
1 1 1.0 1.0 "HEAD" 160 224 3
23.4 34.5 ......
I tried to read the first line with readBin (results are copied below):
2006 Mar 23
3
drag and drop sorting recipe
The new pragmatic Rails Cookbook has a drag and drop sorting recipe. Does
anyone know if this works with 1.0?
I''ve followed the recipe (i think), and I can drag but when I drop
everything goes back the way it was. It seems that the sort logic doesn''t
get invoked.
I put this code in my view:
<%= sortable_element ''task-list'' ,
:url => {
2009 Jul 08
1
bootstrapping error message "Error in t.star[r, ] <- statistic(data, i[r, ], ...) : number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length"
Hi,
I am trying to run some bootstraps with the boot package. When I run
it with 400 replicates it does it ok, but then I need to run the same
analysis but with 89, 86, 102 and 106 samples (for four different
environments), and then is when I get the error message:
> mybootstrap <- boot(Datos, mystat, 2000)
Error in t.star[r, ] <- statistic(data, i[r, ], ...) : number of
items to