similar to: [RFC] Adding time-trace to LLD?

Hi, I noticed that the SVN notification email to cfe-commits was missing for r368632. The same seems to go for r360545. I wonder whether this is related to having a unicode character in the subject line. Phabricator review emails seem to work okay. Is there a problem with the system sending these? Regards Russ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I would like to increase the number of iterations for running a Buckley-James regression model in the rms package, but something is apparently syntactically wrong. The following code initially is exactly as it appears in the help page (which runs successfully), then a "failure to converge" message (resulting from specifying an 'identity' link argument, the error message

Hi, I would like to write a function which has the following syntax: myfn <- function(formula, ftime, fstatus, data) { # step 1: obtain terms in `formula' from dataframe `data' # step 2: obtain ftime from `data' # step 3: obtain fstatus from `data' # step 4: do model estimation # step 5: return results } The user would call this function as: myfn(formula=myform,

Hello, I have a question regarding competing risk regression using cmprsk package (function crr()). I am using R2.9.1. How can I do to assess the effect of qualitative predictor (gg) with more than two categories (a,b,c) categorie c is the reference category. See above results, gg is considered like a ordered predictor ! Thank you for your help Jan > # simulated data to test > set.seed(10)

Hello everyone, (This is my second question posted today on the R list). I am carrying out a competing risks analysis using the cuminc function...this takes the form: cuminc(ftime,fstatus,group) In my study, fstatus has 3 different causes of failure (1,2,3) there are also censored cases (0). "group" has two levels (0 and 1). I therefore have 6 different cumulative incidence curves:

Hi Xiph.org Team. We are using opusfile library <https://github.com/xiph/opusfile> for streaming *.opus* audio in our projects. But now we have a problem with building opusfile library for android with *ndk-build*. In particular, with arm64-v8a platform: Google removed <sys/timeb.h> from android. And now building opusfile with nkd-build crashes with error "fatal error:

Hi all I do not understand why I am getting the following error message. Can anybody help me with this? Thanks in advance. install.packages("cmprsk") library(cmprsk) result1 <-crr(ftime, fstatus, cov1, failcode=1, cencode=0 ) one.pout1 = predict(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) predict.crr(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) Error: could not find function

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Ignoring FE time which can be fully parallelized and assuming 10%

Hi All, I am running a scatter plot and trying to add a best fit line. I use an abline function, but get no line drawn over the points. I also get no error. I arm using V 2.10.0 on Windows 7. Here is my code, including the SAS transport file import: require (foreign) require (chron) require (Hmisc) require (lattice) clin <- sasxport.get("y:\\temp\\subset.xpt") attach(clin)

On 03/09/2020 22:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:05:46PM -0400, Andrew Walker via samba wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: >>>> On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:49 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, and often intimidating for newcomers > > > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use multiple avenues of communication, it’s *really* hard to imagine email as a *mechanism*

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:55 AM David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 18/11/2019 16:39, Stefan Teleman via llvm-dev wrote: > > I can't recall an instance when I had difficulty using, or was > > intimidated by, email, for saying something on a mailing list. > > Subscribing to a mailing list, particularly one as high-traffic as >

Dear all, I am trying to use the crr function in the cmprsk package version 2.2 to analyse 198 observations.I have receive the error in solve.default. Can anyone give me some insights into where the problem is? Thanks here is my script : cov=cbind(x1,x2) z<-crr(ftime,fstatus,cov)) and data file: x1 x2 fstatus ftime 0 .02 1 263 0 .03 1 113 0 .03 1 523

Dear R users, I created a matrix that tells me the first day of use of a category by id. #Calculate time difference test$tdiff<-as.numeric(difftime(as.Date("2002-09-01"), test$ftime, units = "days")) # obtain the index date per person and dcategory index.date.test<-tapply(test$tdiff, list(test$id, test$rcat), max) Nonetheless, at the moment I think will be

I am writing a cron script to check if certain extensions are online and if they aren't then Asterisk creates a couple of .call files to notify another set of extensions or external numbers. It works fine except for logging information. What I'm doing in the script is setting a "fake" caller ID (as it's generated by Asterisk, not by a user) and calling out real users. So

A problem has been pointed out by a French user of the survival package and I'm looking for a pointer. > options(OutDec= ",") > fit <- survfit(Surv(1:6 /2) ~ 1) > fit$time [1] NA 1 NA 2 NA 3 A year or two ago some test cases that broke survfit were presented to me. The heart of the problem was numbers that were almost identical, where table(x) and unique(x) gave

I have a data frame (morgan) of hourly river flow, river levels and wind direction and speed thus: Time hour lev.morgan lev.lock2 lev.lock1 flow direction velocity 1 2009-07-06 15:00:00 15 3.266 3.274 3.240 1710.6 180.282 4.352 2 2009-07-06 16:00:00 16 3.268 3.272 3.240 1441.8 192.338 5.496 3 2009-07-06 17:00:00 17 3.268

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com>wrote: > Ignoring FE time which can be fully parallelized and assuming 10% > compile time is spent in serial module passes, 25% time is spent in > CGSCC pass, the maximum speed up that can be gained by using function > level parallelism is less than 3x. Even adding support for parallel > compilation

On 01/14/2020 08:59 AM, Russell Gallop wrote: > Hi Tom, Hans, > > I can't see LLVM-9.0.1-win*.exe from Hans on the GitHub release page (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-9.0.1). Is this still in progress? > Hans did you upload these? I don't see them on the server. -Tom > Thanks > Russ > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 20:05, Tom Stellard via

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Xinliang David Li >> > <xinliangli