similar to: DenseMap/ValueMap: is M[New]=M[Old] valid ?

I actually ran into an elusive bug with this exact same issue some time ago as well, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42065 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D62624. The strange thing about that bug was that it only showed up if built with GCC; Clang dereferenced the right hand side reference before evaluating the left hand side, as long as the value type was as small as the reference

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, David Blaikie wrote: > I'd be surprised if Clang or GCC's behavior here varied depending on the > size of anything, but maybe? > > In any case, C++17 or so requires the RHS to be evaluated before the LHS for > assignments - so this is now /always/ wrong, not just unspecified (which, I > guess, also always wrong... just sometimes accidentally right)

Hi there, I added a function to a module, but failed to write the bitcode to file because it hit the: assert(I != ValueMap.end() && "Value not in slotcalculator!") So I added some diagnosis information there, unsigned ValueEnumerator::getValueID(const Value *V) const { if (isa<MDNode>(V) || isa<MDString>(V)) { ValueMapType::const_iterator I =

After cloning a Module with CloneModule, there doesn't seem to be any easy way to convert a Value pointing into the old Module to a Value pointing into the new one. The CloneModule implementation already has to keep such a mapping internally, so I've written a patch that exposes it as a second inout parameter to CloneModule(), with the one param version being a simple wrapper for backward

Hi Guoliang, > I added a function to a module, but failed to write the bitcode to file > because it hit the: > assert(I != ValueMap.end()&& "Value not in slotcalculator!") does the module pass the verifier after you add the function to it? Ciao, Duncan.

On 17/09/18, Peter Stuge (peter at stuge.se) wrote: > Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > > Can ssh-add work on the remote socket file? > > I expect that it will just work<tm>. The local socket is just a > socket, and the protocol[1] message SSH_AGENT_ADD_KEY is the same. Local: $ ssh-agent > /tmp/agent.env $ source /tmp/agent.env $ ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_user $ ssh

Hi, sorry for the stupid question, but however i am following all howtos and tutorials it is not working 1) i have created CA certificate - /etc/pki/tls/misc/CA -newca 2) i have generated a new request - /etc/pki/tls/misc/CA -newreq 3) i have signed certificate /etc/pki/tls/misc/CA -signreq SO i have CA in /etc/pki/CA i have newkey.pem i have newcert.pem i have also cealrkey.pem (without

> From: Eric Christopher > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] How to associate extra comments to a > MachineInstruction ? > > Should be spelled like this yes? > > Asm->OutStreamer.AddComment("foo") > Asm->EmitFoo(); > > -eric That should work at the moment that you are emitting the instructions. But what would you do when you are manipulating a

Ok I think we have some common ground - CSE should choose the aliased pointer over the non-aliased one because we don't want the no-aliasing information to creep outwards from the inlined callsite. I'll put together a patch in the coming days and add y'all as reviewers so you get visibility. Cheers, -Neil. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:47 PM Jeroen Dobbelaere < Jeroen.Dobbelaere at

Hi, I am trying to make my tablegen files more flexible and for that I would like to have a name that in the end will be replaced with a type. If tablegen would support c preprocssing, I would do it like this: --- #define myBaseType i32 ... def imm32 : Operand<myBaseType>; def immZExt10 : ImmLeaf<myBaseType, [{return isUInt<10>(Imm);}]>; ... --- Is there a way to achieve

To join our call on Thursday, May 28th @ 9-10 AM central time / 2-3 PM UTC please use this information: Meeting URL https://bluejeans.com/643493129?src=join_info Meeting ID 643 493 129 Want to dial in from a phone? Dial one of the following numbers: +1.312.216.0325 (US (Chicago)) +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose)) +1.866.226.4650 (US Toll Free) (see all numbers -

Johannes, Thanks, I have been following along some of the thread(s) and the phab reviews. The scope of this work is more encompassing than our current needs and I've looked at trying to carve a piece out. It's not clear to me what purpose the llvm.noalias intrinsic serves right now. Also, if a mem instruction has !noalias metadata, then it should not be aliased, but I must be missing

Great, thanks! Are you planning on just talking about these things with slides? Do we have other things to which we can link for people to read? -Hal Hal Finkel Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory ________________________________ From: Tarique Islam <tislam at ca.ibm.com> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 8:19:31 AM To:

Thanks, Jeroen, that really helps. A follow-up question, if you don't mind. What if we have code somewhat similar to your example in assign3() but it's in C++ and the pointer derived from x is stored in a class member field: class S { public: S(int *d): data(d) {} int *getData() { return data; } private: int *__restrict__ data; }; void assign4(int *pA, long N) { int

Hi, is there a convenient way to associate/add a comment to a MachineInstruction, so that in the produced assembly file, the comment is added next to the instruction ? Greetings, Jeroen Dobbelaere

ssh-keygen already supports importing and exporting ssh keys using various formats. The "-m PEM" which should have been the easiest to be used with various of external application expects PKCS#1 encoded key, while many applications use SubjectPublicKeyInfo encoded key. This change adds SubjectPublicKeyInfo support, to ease integration with applications. Examples: ## convert

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jeroen Dobbelaere <Jeroen.Dobbelaere at synopsys.com> wrote: >> From: Eric Christopher >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] How to associate extra comments to a >> MachineInstruction ? >> >> Should be spelled like this yes? >> >> Asm->OutStreamer.AddComment("foo") >> Asm->EmitFoo(); >> >> -eric

Hi, I am investigating a difference in code generation between release and assert builds of llvm. The culprit is IndVarSimplify that comes up with different behavior on the same input: in the assertion build, it does do an extra 'INDVARS: Rewriting loop exit condition' After digging around, it seems that following change is the culprit: ----- Author: Philip Reames <listmail at

Hello all, What are the instructions for making an SSL cert for Dovecot IMAPS? Two methods have been tried, and work, with Evolution; however generate the following error when Thunderbird tries to connect. Thank you, method 1 : self signed openssl req -newkey rsa:4096 -sha512 -x509 -days 365 -nodes -keyout mykey.key -out mycert.pem method 2 : Let's Encrypt (LE) CA Created with Certbot

Hi, everyone, We had a great call last month, and progress is definitely being made on several fronts. The notes from our last call are available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ybwEKDVtIbhIhK50qYtwKsL50K-NvB6LfuBsfepBZ9Y/edit#heading=h.vpxs8lkuxy79 and, also, pasted below. DOODLE POLL: As we discussed on our last call, I would like to schedule a regular call to discuss