similar to: 404s within LLVM documentation

Patrick, how long does the crawl take? I suspect if we fixed internal documentation links so that they point to local copies of documentation when building locally it would be quite quick (no actual idea though). That in turn would probably make it feasible to add to the existing documentation build bots, I think. James On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 03:47, Neil Nelson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

Hi all, I wrote a compiler front end which generates IR codes, but due to the logic, the IR codes have a lot of instructions like unnecessary br jump, basic block creation, load instructions and expression which can be simplified. now I want to use built in passes to optimize the generated code, but after I read the tutorial: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/MyFirstLanguageFrontend, I found that I

On 11/5/07, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Hi All, Hi, > > http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/ Very interesting tutorial, reading it now :) > Anyone have thoughts or feedback? :) There's a typo in http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl5.html "the Phi node expects to have an extry" s/extry/entry/ Best regards, Edwin

On Nov 11, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Kelly Wilson wrote: > Hey Chris: > > Here are the diffs for the next few chapters of the tutorial that I > have > edited. Nice! You are an excellent editor, I'm impressed. I committed these without any changes here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20071112/055566.html Thank you for the help with this. > Please

Hi folks, I'm working on migrating a JIT compiler from the old ORCv1 JIT APIs to the newer ORCv2 ones and am having some trouble getting the code from chapter 1 of the "Building a JIT" [1] tutorial working properly. I have previously walked through the "My First Langauge" [2] tutorial and that went smoothly using the provided JIT class, but using the one from the JIT

Hi llvm-admin, (cc llvm-dev for visibility) We’re working on some improvements to the documentation, and want to move things (e.g. the Kaleidoscope tutorial into a subdirectory) around without breaking any links to it. Is there a way to do forwards on the web page that you prefer? -Chris

Very nice. Here's a couple comments on the first 6 chapters: http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl1.html "We handle comments by skipping to the end of the line and then returning the next comment." Shouldn't this say "returning the next comment"? http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl2.html I was a bit confused at first because the AST node classes are called ASTs.

Sorry for the bother Jim, but I'm calling on you again for guidance about llvm-gcc mentions. What should be done about the mention of llvm-gcc on <http://llvm.org/docs/TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html>? Can we just roughly s/llvm-gcc/clang/ ? Daniel, feel free to provide guidance as well. -- Sean Silva On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel.dunbar at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Praveen, Thanks for pointing that out :) That's my mistake. I might have been misidentifying the issue with the assert statement. With those fixes made function calls seem to all call the first function called in the REPL. For example: ready> def fib(n) if (n < 2) then n else fib(n - 1) + fib(n - 2); ... ready> fib(40); Evaluated to 102334155.000000 ready> fib(10); # This

Unfortunately, LNT still uses the Makefiles underneath, and the Makefiles support a few users who use the more advanced hackery they support. We should keep it for the time being. - Daniel On Nov 14, 2012, at 13:30, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > The top of the file says that it is deprecated in favor of LNT. Is > this document still needed? It makes mention of

Hi Sean, On 14/11/12 23:53, Sean Silva wrote: > Sorry for the bother Jim, but I'm calling on you again for guidance > about llvm-gcc mentions. What should be done about the mention of > llvm-gcc on <http://llvm.org/docs/TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html>? Can we > just roughly s/llvm-gcc/clang/ ? Daniel, feel free to provide guidance > as well. to some extent llvm-gcc lives on

HI Lang, Thanks a bunch for the reply. That worked great for on my end and is a pretty tiny change. Really appreciate all the work you've done on this new JIT stuff and putting together those great tutorials. Zeke On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:07 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Zeke, > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > You're right: the issue is

On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Anyone have thoughts or feedback? :) > > Nice job. The only bit that is not immediately clear is the 'Proto' > variable, but is clear when looking through the code at the end of the page. Where in the tutorial? What would you suggest that I say? > Could do with a link to the LLVMBuilder class reference material. I added a link

Hello all. I'm in need of a benchmark that can be compiled to IR or bytecode. I found the test-suite project (https://llvm.org/docs/TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html) and thought a benchmark in that project might work. However, I'm having trouble figuring out how to actually compile any of the benchmarks to IR or bytecode. Using cmake and make I can compile them to binaries, but at no point do

Hi All, LLVM has long needed a tutorial for people who are interested in using it to implement their favorite language and to demonstrate how to use the JIT. To help solve this, I've put together a little tutorial that runs through the implementation and extension of a toy language here: http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/ At this point, the tutorial is feature complete, but might

The Kaleidoscope example here: http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html#adjustments defines a CreateEntryBlockAlloca() helper function that "ensures that the allocas are created in the entry block of the function." It's kid of implied, but I thought I'd ask explicitly: *must* alloca instructions be created in the entry block of a function? - Paul

The top of the file says that it is deprecated in favor of LNT. Is this document still needed? It makes mention of llvm-gcc as well... -- Sean Silva

Index: docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html =================================================================== --- docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (revision 105365) +++ docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (working copy) @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ def unary-(v) 0-v; -# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &gt;. +# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &lt;. def binary&gt; 10 (LHS RHS)

Hi all, I am trying to compile a high-level imperative OOP-like language to the LLVM IR. Do we have any "generic" way of translating a non-SSA form to the LLVM IR's SSA? There are lots of LLVM front-ends now. Do they do such translation individually? or there is some common non-SSA IR that we can translate to, and can be converted to the LLVM IR automatically? I did not find such

I'm using caret to assess classifier performance (and it's great!). However, I've found that my results differ between R2.* and R3.* - reported accuracies are reduced dramatically. I suspect that a code change to kernlab ksvm may be responsible (see version 5.16-24 here: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caret/news.html). I get very different results between caret_5.15-61 +