similar to: Cannot run LLVM unit tests doe to python error in lit

I apologize in advance if this is a somewhat silly question (I’m making my first steps in the infrastructure), but still. Is it true that if an LLVM toolchain is compiled as a cross-toolchain, MCJIT is not expected to work? I’m still working on a toolchain that cross-compiles from Windows to ARM Linux, and I’ve managed to get clang and lld tests to pass, but some (not all) MCJIT tests are

As of r313998, this workflow no longer works: cd <build-dir> ./bin/llvm-lit <src>/llvm/tools/clang/test/CoverageMapping I get: llvm-lit: /Users/vk/src/llvm.org-coverage-braces/llvm/tools/clang/test/lit.cfg.py:97: note: using clang: '/Volumes/Builds/llvm.org-coverage-braces-RA/bin/clang' llvm-lit:

Got it. Attached are both the testcase & the fix. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018, at 12:06, Carlo Kok via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, at 16:45, Davide Italiano wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:12 PM Carlo Kok via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > > That sounds quite reasaonable; how does one usually go about doing that?

This works for me. Can you run "which clang-func-mapping" and also add a line to clang/test/lit.cfg.py to print the value of config.environment['PATH']? On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:27 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > Looking, thanks for the report. > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:22 AM Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > >> As

Looking, thanks for the report. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:22 AM Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > As of r313998, this workflow no longer works: > > cd <build-dir> > ./bin/llvm-lit <src>/llvm/tools/clang/test/CoverageMapping > > I get: > > llvm-lit: /Users/vk/src/llvm.org-coverage-braces/llvm/tools/clang/test/ > lit.cfg.py:97: note: using

Sorry, I was thinking to review the test but didn't. Is this test complete? It does invoke lld, but it didn't verify its output. On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 2:03 PM Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote: > Ping Rui. Is there anything else that needs to be done on this patch? > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Carlo Kok via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at

> On Sep 22, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > Ah, the problem goes away once I build clang-func-mapping. > > I stripped some stuff out, but here's pretty much what clang/test/lit.cfg.py says my PATH is: > > ** PATH **: /Volumes/Builds/llvm.org-coverage-braces-RA/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin > > I wonder how

Ah, the problem goes away once I build clang-func-mapping. I stripped some stuff out, but here's pretty much what clang/test/lit.cfg.py says my PATH is: ** PATH **: /Volumes/Builds/llvm.org-coverage-braces-RA/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin I wonder how this ever worked before, when I didn't have clang-func-mapping built. Anyway, thanks for your help! vedant >

> On 18 Nov 2019, at 22:11, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 17:06, Sergej Jaskiewicz <jaskiewiczs at icloud.com <mailto:jaskiewiczs at icloud.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 18 Nov 2019, at 19:55, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 15:23, Sergej

Yea at first I was worried that maybe I changed the semantics of how it looked in PATH, and you had clang-func-mapping in your PATH somewhere before but now lit was building a different PATH. But I looked at that change and it wasn't even creating that substitution before. So it looks like that CL is indeed the problem. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:38 AM Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com>

Hi, while experimenting with llvmlinux on Debian/testing AMD64 I wanted to run some x86-64 ASM tests. I fell over [1] and wanted to run it. So, I cloned clang from Git... $ git clone https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang.git I looked through some docs where I have seen I need "llvm-lit" or "lit.py". The Debian package llvm-7-tools from <apt.llvm.org> does ship

> On 18 Nov 2019, at 19:55, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 15:23, Sergej Jaskiewicz <jaskiewiczs at icloud.com <mailto:jaskiewiczs at icloud.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> Thanks for your response. >> >> On 18 Nov 2019, at 17:44, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote:

It looks like this broke green dragon: http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA/40383/console llvm-lit: /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/projects/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/config.py:173: note: Adding environment variables: {'DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH': '/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/./lib',

> On Nov 10, 2017, at 2:50 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > I checked in a fix for that already, sorry for the trouble. I’m waiting for it to cycle awesome. Thanks! -- adrian > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:49 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com <mailto:aprantl at apple.com>> wrote: > It looks like this broke green dragon: > >

Hi Peter, Thanks for your response. > On 18 Nov 2019, at 17:44, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 12:32, Sergej Jaskiewicz via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> There’s this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38468

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:12 PM Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > That sounds quite reasaonable; how does one usually go about doing that? a repro zip that hits both asserts? > You can take inspiration from anything in lld/test, but basically either an assembly source (or multiple) passed through llvm-mc and then lld, or a YAML file passed to yaml2obj

The simplest way to run a clang test case that I know of is to clone both llvm and clang repos, run all the tests, then run an individual test. IIRC like so: git clone llvm ...... cd llvm/tools git clone clang ..... cd ../../ mkdir build cd build cmake ../llvm ninja check-clang ./bin/llvm-lit -v ./tools/clang/test/Sema/asm.c On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <

It looks like the bots are still red? — Adrian > On Nov 10, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > Wasn't quite fixed, but it got a lot further this time. This time there was still an issue in the test_debuginfo.pl <http://test_debuginfo.pl/> script regarding a hardcoded path to the llgdb.py script. I think I never encountered this locally

I sorta enjoy debugging stuff like this, so if you don't mind, I'll dig into it once I get a chance -- traveling so, my access is a bit sketchy right now. I'll see if I can grab the logs and let you know if I find anything interesting. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > That change was added specifically to workaround a failure

Hi Zachary: I was able to reproduce the greendragon results locally (OSX), and fix the problem by excluding 'debuginfo-tests' from check-clang -- this prevents them from being added twice, once for check-clang and again for check-debuginfo. Below are the minimized patches I used to reproduce and fix the problem -- based on your originals. I've verified these patches work when