similar to: Can I build llvm with only a handful of source files compiled for debug?

Actually, I have same question, If llvm build provides a option similar to that, it will be lot more easier for people doing development in relatively less (compute, storage) PC's. On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 00:22, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Nothing supported, though might not be too hard to do by hand. > > If you're having long link

Regarding resource constraint problems, I didn't build llvm on much heavier machine previously, so it is difficult for me to tell whether my build is taking longer than expected trivially, fresh build (+ clang, lldb) takes time. But rebuild are actually fast. I will use -compress-debug-sections with the full build and rebuilds and see how fast it is :) Making an assumption here: since

Hello, My system hangs every time during last stages of building LLVM ( starting at 95% in a CMake build ) using CMake or Ninja, sometime close to the linking of llvm-dysmutil. Could you please suggest tips that could speed up the compilation ? Thank You, Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:31 AM David Jones via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Throw hardware at it. > While I agree that this is good advice with the current state of affairs, I don't think we should consider the current situation acceptable. LLVM has a lot of knobs that Tim alluded to, but first time users shouldn't have to search for them to get a

The linking state of a Debug build seems to require a humongous amount of memory. My poor little linux machine with 16G of ram swaps its brains out. Waiting for it to finish (if it ever does) is like the old days when you submitted your deck of cards and waited until the next day to see the results. To debug a new backend, is there a way to just get the debug info for the Target/Foo

I was wondering if anyone on this list has run into this problem. When creating/mounting RDMA volumes of ~half dozen or less nodes - I am able to successfully create, start, and mount these RDMA only volumes. However if I try to scale this to 20, 50, or even 100 nodes RDMA only volumes completely fall over on themselves. Some of the basic symptoms I'm seeing are: * Volume create always

Hey all, I thought I'd run this by the list before I attempt to go through official support channels (just because I never get anywhere). I've done 3 small business installations with asterisk and polycom sound point IP 500s. The first 2 installs run CVS-Head, the most recent install is just running stable. Now I have 28 polycom soundpoint IP 500's on their system, all using SIP no

I am getting a handful of these errors, and I am not sure why. The directories in question have rights like this: drw-r--r-- 2 osstbb osstbb 42 2008-05-02 00:04 12981826/ As root, why would it matter if it has executability? I can read it just fine on the server. Or is it an issue when it tries to create it on the -client- ? Is there a way to fix this? I can chmod 0755 the dirs on the server

Another problem I would like to speack about : tags. Each format appears to create its own tag. TwinVQ and WMA tags are limited but Mp3 has a good tag system (although the "genre" category could be improved). Now ogg develops a new kind of tagging. I imagine converting all my tags with thousand of tracks... real nightmare... Is there an authority or a project to standardiza tags ?

Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc2 Binaries will be added as they become available. The tag went in roughly one week behind schedule (see "Upcoming Releases" at https://llvm.org), but

Alright, I''ve been programming with Rails for a little while now, and I really like what I see. I made a simple application for our clients that need to be able to view their personal and contact information, the ports they''re buying through our ISP, and communicate back and forth with us. The thing is - the application is pretty messy because I have been hired as a new

Unfortunately, from personal experience, LLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS appears to have no effect for Visual Studio builds, AND some of the tools linked can take up several GB of RAM, so you'll end up with paging issues. I ended up getting a RAM upgrade in order to sensibly build it (note, I think builds with debug information take more memory than those that don't, and also the clang projects

On Aug 14, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > It probably has something to do with using mbox format. Are the IMAP UIDs changing unexpectedly? Errors/warnings logged related to it? Unfortunately it's a rather troublesome mailbox format. There are likely some bugs in Dovecot mbox code, but it's difficult and time consuming to try to

I heard about some inexpensive security cameras which get their power through the same cat5 cable which delivers the data/pictures (which would simplify wiring tremendously). Does anyone know about these? Do they work with Linux, particularly CentOS? tnx 4 tips.

On 2020-09-07 11:21:13 [+1000], Darren Tucker wrote: > The zstd part would be a larger discussion because we would need to > either carry it as a Portable patch or have zstd added to OpenBSD > base, and I don't know if that would be accepted. Do you have any > performance numbers for zstd in this application? A key stroke is here 10 bytes of raw data which zstd compresses usually

Can anyone point me to an example of how to use the Insertion.Before technique? I''ve just begun trying to use AJAX and worked through Curt''s "Ajax on Rails". The description in AWD of what this does is just what I need, there''s no example of how to use it, and I''m getting no joy using Google. Any help is tremendously appreciated. -------------- next

We are seeing some poor performance recently that is focused around users with large mailboxes (100,000 message /INBOX, 80,000 message subfolders, etc). The performance problem manifests as very high system% utilization - basically iowait for NFS. There are two imap servers with plenty of horsepower/memory/etc. They are connected to a 3050c cluster via gig-e. Here are the mount options:

Hi, It looks like the DeadStoreElimination optimization doesn't work across BasicBlock boundaries. The project I'm working on (https://github.com/trailofbits/mcsema), would tremendously benefit from even simple cross-block DSE. There was a patch to do non-local DSE few years ago (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-January/028751.html), but seems that the patch was never

On Tuesday 09 June 2009 14:34, Dan Gohman wrote: > Can you describe what problem you're trying to solve here? Does it > really need Regular Expressions? Yes. I want TableGen to be able to infer lots of stuff programmatically. This helps tremendously when specifying things like, oh, AVX. :) We could invent our own pattern matching syntax, but why?

Good day all Is there someone that's got asterisk working well with a A101/E1 card Apparently they don't have RBS support? Please advice Thanks Altus