similar to: llvm-canon

Patch for review. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM Puyan Lotfi <puyan.lotfi.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Ping. > > Still working on preparing code for review. Will have a patch for review > ready in the coming days. > > PL > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:06 PM Puyan Lotfi <puyan.lotfi.llvm at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >>

On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:27 PM, David Greene wrote: > Exactly right. One of my first jobs here was to fix a bunch of > overflow > problems exposed by optimization. It's now become a tradition to > give this task to any new optimizer employee. :) But that sounds like Cray is being fairly conservative in treating overflow problems as errors during optimization. Is that

On Friday 22 August 2008 16:14, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > > Thanks! This is all very interesting, and tells me that LLVM has a > > way to go to fully support all of these capabilities (if that is the > > right thing to do, which isn't clear). OTOH, it looks like a lot of > >

Hi Jakob, Thanks for creating this interesting proposal. Let me just comment on this part: >> What might be better is to put some abstract interface between >> instcombine and the IR, so that instcombine can be run on these >> pseudo-MIs as well as on IR. > > I like the idea of sharing code between IR and MI passes through an > abstract interface. I think that later

On 10 August 2013 15:32, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hi Jakob, > > Thanks for creating this interesting proposal. > Let me just comment on this part: > > >>> What might be better is to put some abstract interface between >>> instcombine and the IR, so that instcombine can be run on these pseudo-MIs >>> as well as on IR. >>

Hi all, I am a newbie and I have not played a lot with tc utility. I have red maybe everything that has to do with massive filtering (maybe not everything). If you can help me on this I would appriciate that very much. I use tc utility with iproute2-ss040831. I want to limit bandwidth for the 192.168.0.0/16 subnet using this script. tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root

I am planning a setup with thousands of classes in a HTB qdisc, say from 1:1000 to 1:2000, each with a very small rate and a big ceil, for fair sharing of a 45mbit link. I suspect some problems could be lurking in there. Anyone having good/bad experience with such number of classes? Simon _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

On 10/03/2013 01:22 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: > > I’m not sure how to make sense of an NUW flag coming from a sub. > > NSW is just a misnomer for signed overflow. SCEV canonicalizes sub a,b to add a, (-b). Unfortunately, signed overflow is not the same thing for sub and add... > > sub nsw %a, %b != add nsw %a, (-1 * %b) > > sub nsw i32, -1, INT_MIN is true. > > add

Try verifying kvno from the client that gives the error message. That kvno = 2 for dc$ must've come from somewhere. You can also double check e.g. via ADUC ldap attributes of the dc$: lastpwdset and kvno. If  kvno is definately 1 that means that client connecting has some error, if it's 2, than it means that dc has outdated keytab. And if it's the former, than I really am not sure

Hi all, After demoting one of AD DCs, I’m unable to join the domain again. Demoting was fine. OS is Centos 6 Samba 4.7.6 (with 4.7.4 doesn’t work either) built from sources. klist Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: administrator at DOMAIN.NET.PL Valid starting Expires Service principal 04/02/18 18:44:33 04/03/18 04:44:33 krbtgt/DOMAIN.NET.PL at DOMAIN.NET.PL

what is the output of "kvno dc.domain.net.pl"? There seems to be mismatch kvno of the secrets keytab, and what is client expecting (kvno 2). Kvno increments by 1 for every password change. Was there by any chance password change for the dc$ account and keytab was not recreated? If You made some upgrades, maybe during process You for example rejoined the domain (that would set new

I'm trying to use the same hostname. The meta cleanup - I can't see the demoted controller in ADUC nor in Active Directory Sites and Services. Shall I try via ntdsutil? Regards, Kris -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of lingpanda101 via samba Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 9:09 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba]

>>>> What might be better is to put some abstract interface between >>>> instcombine and the IR, so that instcombine can be run on these >>>> pseudo-MIs >>>> as well as on IR. >>> >>> >>> I like the idea of sharing code between IR and MI passes through an >>> abstract interface. I think that later stages in the IR

I've cleared all DNS records (indeed, they were still there). I'm not sure if that was the issue, cause I've discovered that the real problem is related to insufficient Administrator rights. I was able to join that DC to domain using credentials of my second user (member of domain admins group). The first one had to get out from Domain admins. Can this be related to fixing the

On Aug 10, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: >> I like the idea of sharing code between IR and MI passes through an abstract interface. I think that later stages in the IR pipeline also need an instruction optimizer instead of a canonicalizer. >> >> An alternative approach would be to describe these transformations in a DSL instead of C++. >

I'm sorry, you're absolutely right. I'm not sure why I didn't follow your hint. My fault. Now, it seems I have exactly the same output as you: [root at dc private]# net rpc rights list accounts -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: BUILTIN\Print Operators SeLoadDriverPrivilege SeShutdownPrivilege SeInteractiveLogonRight BUILTIN\Account Operators

Hi, I suggest you post this to samba at list.samba.org that more for these questions. Try this setting in resolv.conf search domain.net.pl nameserver 10.1.10.11 # IP of DC itself. #nameserver # and extra nameserver that has access to the DC dns info. (a second dc maybe) nameserver 8.8.8.8 # IP of forwarder in SMB.conf as backup for internet access. # and max 3 nameservers in

On Oct 3, 2013, at 7:15 AM, Michele Scandale <michele.scandale at gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/03/2013 01:22 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> >> I’m not sure how to make sense of an NUW flag coming from a sub. >> >> NSW is just a misnomer for signed overflow. SCEV canonicalizes sub a,b to add a, (-b). Unfortunately, signed overflow is not the same thing for sub and

There was lack of membership in Administrators domain/Builtin group. I had only: Domain Users Group Policy Creator Owners Enterprise Admins Schema Admins Domain Admins I've added and I'll try. Thank you. Any hint with the recreation of keytab file? Regards, Kris -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny via samba Sent:

Hi, My name is Puyan and I've been exploring ways to improve the state of instruction level diffing using llvm and MIR. Below is a proposal for a new llvm tool meant to address issues encountered when diffing at the machine level. I'm eager to hear the community's feedback. Thanks PL mir-canon: A new tool for canonicalizing MIR for cleaner diffing. Problem Statement and