similar to: Was there a recent git script change?

"git remote get-url" is apparently fairly new, the old version is "git config remote.origin.url". Might be worth using that for compatibility. On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 5:11 PM Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Cam, it works for me on TOT (89fb9e8ce15). > > What does the failed command return for you? It should be: > > > git

Hi Stefan Thank you! In case, you missed in llvm-dev listing: you can find the proposal here : link. <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1202EcXlWMQ8yxu5qD0b5fE0a_kihlcaPNpZo_Jk0YeQ/edit?usp=sharing> Thanks for working on summarising the Bugzilla tickets to track the recent changes in ORC this is really helpful. On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 21:33, Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at

Hello everyone A previous thread about OrcJIT brought up bug reports on Bugzilla. A quick search gives 20+ results: https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?component=OrcJIT&list_id=162232&query_format=advanced&resolution=--- While some of them are obviously outdated (addModuleSet API cleanup [1]), others may actually be relevant again (Small code model? [2]). If you reported one of them,

No issues pushing commits here, (despite it being my first commit via git!). On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 15:11, Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like the lab.llvm.org build bot status page has been down for a > while. > > Yes, same here. Additionally, having trouble pushing commits to the > monorepo: > > $ git llvm push -n > Pushing 1

Hi All, No open source work to speak of this week. All my effort is going on tidying up the new initializers patch which I expect to land this weekend, or early next week. -- Lang. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200131/db360b1d/attachment.html>

Hi, It looks like the lab.llvm.org build bot status page has been down for a while. No idea about the status of the build bots themselves though. Could somebody confirm and take a look? James -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190613/aefdbbf8/attachment.html>

Hi all In case anyone has a remote to the (unofficial) https://github.com/llvm-mirror, please note that all the repos are at least 8 days behind. There's no warning about it. The page still says it's "Updated every five minutes". Best Stefan -- https://flowcrypt.com/pub/stefan.graenitz at gmail.com

Hi All, This was a quiet week -- the only significant ORC change was to the new TargetProcessControl API [1], which acquired the ability to load libraries and search for symbols in the target process in [2]. A new TargetProcessControl based definition generator is included to take advantage of this, and the LLJITWithTargetProcessControl example has been updated to include it. Regards, Lang. [1]

Hi Igor, not sure if that will work, but have you tried lli -jit-kind=orc-lazy ? The default is still MCJIT: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/tools/lli/lli.cpp#L88 On 13/01/2020 19:07, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > (+Lang for JIT/interpreter questions) > > On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 5:00 PM Igor Gomon via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org

Hello, I recently hit an issue when JIT'ing my generated IR using llvm::orc::LLJIT. My IR contains the following definition of a global variable: > $_ZZ23TestStaticVarInFunctionbE1x = comdat any > @_ZZ23TestStaticVarInFunctionbE1x = linkonce_odr dso_local global i32 123, > comdat, align 4 > And in my host process, there exists the same symbol. I would expect LLJIT to resolve the

Hi Björn I made a workaround for this specific issue a long time ago for the Projucer C++ JIT Engine. It basically forwards the call to another stub that provides enough space to encode a full 64-bit address. The patch is based on LLVM 3.9, so I guess it won't work out-of-the-box on a recent release, but it may give you enough hints to figure it out on your own:

Hi All, There was only one interesting ORC-specific commit this week: A new example showing how to initialize and de-initialize JITDylibs has been added in llvm/examples/OrcV2Examples/LLJITWithInitializers. The Extensible RTTI system (https://reviews.llvm.org/D39111) that I posted a while back has landed. While this is not ORC specific, I expect it to be used in upcoming patches to allow ORC

Hey Lang and Stefan, Using dllimport on my “planschiValue” actually worked! But I have no idea why, because the relocation is still a REL32 if I use dumpbin… So how is it possible for that to work? However… when I load an COFF object file, am I able to change the relocations to dllimport somehow? I honestly can’t imagine how this would work since the machine code is probably already adjusted to

Hi All, I'm back again after a couple of weeks hiatus, and I have some good news for anyone interested in cross-process JITing with OrcV2: The remote TargetProcessControl and Orc library breakup patch has landed in 1d0676b54c4 [1]. Thanks very much to Dave Blaikie and Stefan Graenitz for all their feedback on the review! As described in my last email, this commit breaks the OrcJIT library

Hi all, I am following the LLVM JIT tutorial API based on: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/BuildingAJIT1.html I have 2 independent questions: 1. The tutorial mentions that "*will defer compilation of the module until any of its definitions is looked up*". Does that mean to force eager compilation, i have to keep track of all functions added to the Module and do a lookup? I want the

Hi Stefan, I just tried the -jit-kind=orc-lazy with lli executable and it solves the problem on Ubuntu 18.04 (still does not work on Windows 10). But this solution is good enough for me now. Thanks again for your help! -- Best Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Igor Gomon <giv_ua at hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 7:38 PM To: Stefan Gränitz

Hello everyone I was just porting a project to build against the LLVM 9 apt packages and noticed that the issue I filed and explained during the release phase in https://llvm.org/PR43035 still persists: CMake Error at /usr/lib/llvm-9/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake:1323 (message):   The imported target "yaml-bench" references the file      "/usr/lib/llvm-9/bin/yaml-bench"

Hey Lang, That is really cool :D Is the creation of that table a Windows thingy or is this the way the LLVM handles it? Also… since it is COFF related – the never ending story of “finding my global constructors” first of all: Yes! I tried using the “initialize” function of LLVMJIT – however this only worked when I was loading a Module. When I added the object file (from the same source) the

Hi All, There was no update last week -- I'm still trying to get back into a regular schedule. Open-source changes since the last update were: (1) Some bug fixes for JITLink MachO / arm64 support (PAGE21/PAGEOFF12 now handle addends correctly). (2) llvm-jitlink now supports loading archives as well as relocatable objects. (3) llvm-jitlink now supports basic object-file level mocking and

On 02/12/2019 15:21, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > yaml-bench is shipping in libclang-common-9-dev Ok possible. Though, it adds an unnecessary 46MB to my docker image. > It should be indeed in llvm-9-dev instead. This would hide the problem, right. I am not sure it's is a good solution. Where can we review the build process for the apt packages? On 02/12/2019 15:21, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: