similar to: storage class 0 symbol is generated for a double constant in COFF-x86-64 object file

Hi Reid, Sure. Here I attach the trimmed IR(sim_0.ll) which llc.exe takes and produces a 0 storage class symbol. The IR is fairly long but there is only 1 usage of real constant as actual argument passing to function iki_vlog_time() at line 137. The version of llc.exe is $ llc.exe --version LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 7.0.1 DEBUG build. Default target: x86_64-pc-win32 Host

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:55 AM, r4start <r4start at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all. > > While compiling next code > @A = weak unnamed_addr constant { i32, i32, i32 } { i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 }, > section ".data" > was discovered that llc ignores weak linkage if we emit it in COFF object. > Attached patch solves this problem, please review. > > I found some

Hi all. While compiling next code @A = weak unnamed_addr constant { i32, i32, i32 } { i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 }, section ".data" was discovered that llc ignores weak linkage if we emit it in COFF object. Attached patch solves this problem, please review. I found some similar tests in test/Objects/Inputs. Should I do something like trivial.ll checking or there is a better way to check

Dear all, let say I have following list: Dat <- vector("list", length = 26) names(Dat) <- LETTERS My_Function <- function(x) return(rnorm(5)) Dat1 <- lapply(Dat, My_Function) However I want to apply my function 'My_Function' for all elements of 'Dat' except the elements having 'names(Dat) == "P"'. Here I have specified the name

I have the following FORTRAN code converted to a DLL: ! my_xmean.f90 ! ! FUNCTIONS/SUBROUTINES exported from my_function.dll: ! my_function - subroutine ! subroutine my_xmean(X,N,XMEAN) ! Expose subroutine my_function to users of this DLL ! !DEC$ ATTRIBUTES DLLEXPORT,C,REFERENCE,ALIAS:'my_xmean_'::my_xmean ! Body of my_function DOUBLE PRECISION X(N) XMEAN=0D0 DO J=1,N

Dear All, We came across a problem when using the "tree" package to analyze our data set. First, in the "tree" function, if we use the default value "mindev=0.01", the resulting regression tree has a single node. So, we set "mindev=0", and obtain a tree with 931 terminal nodes. However, when we further use the "cv.tree" function to run a 10-fold

Great, thanks for your help. I'll take a crack at it and contact Renato if I have questions. -Greg On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Cool; glad to help. > > When I added the data region bits, I tried to keep the ARM-style annotations in mind a bit, so hopefully things will fit together without too much trouble. > > -Jim >

Hi Gordon, I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? Thanks in advance. Kirill. int some_test_func( int ){ std::cout << "!!!!" << std::endl; return 8848; } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]){ Module *M = new Module("test"); ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new

Cool; glad to help. When I added the data region bits, I tried to keep the ARM-style annotations in mind a bit, so hopefully things will fit together without too much trouble. -Jim On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > Thanks Jim! > > I have updated the bug with your comments, I think it's a good start. > > Greg, let me know

Where is the best place to put a function that will be used in both several controller and several models? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

CC llvm-dev ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Hello Duncan The size of ARM binaries created by clang has increased after r236642. Would you be able to find some time to look at my findings and share your thoughts about the problem, please? r236642 prevents emitting of temp label names into object files to save memory. This is fine, the label names do not appear in the resulting binaries.

Hi Tim, Thanks a lot for the reply. I tested libc.so which is a shared library. llvm-objdump also report some disassemble errors. Could you please tell me more about $a, $t and $d symbols? How these symbols are used to define different regions? Where I can find this symbols in ELF object file? Thanks, David I'm now try to find a decoder of ARM instructions in oder On Thu, Jun 7, 2012

Hi, I'd like to divide each element of a matrix by a specific value per column. These specific values are stored in a list. For example: > x <- c(1,2,3,4,5) > y <- matrix(c(1:30), nrow = 6) Now I want to divide each element in y[,1] by x[1], y[,2] by x[2] etc. I have tried this > my_function <- function(data, ind) data/ind > apply(y, 2, my_function, x) [,1] [,2]

Hi Tim, Thanks a lot for your help! I'm very grateful. libc.so is a prelinked library, I'll build a non-prelinked one and have another try. I'm now at the start of a binary translation project. I want to convert ARM binary code [*] to llvm ir, which is then translated to binary for our mips like architecture. That's why I'm looking for a decoder for ARM binary. The

Hello World, I have a function that makes pairwise comparisons between two strings. I would like to apply this function to my data (which consists of columns with different strings) in the way that it compares the first with the second entry, and then the third with the fourth, and then the fifth with the sixth, and so on down each column... So (2x-1) and (2x) would be the different entries to be

Hi Kirill, Don't forget to add X86TargetMachine.obj (add to Additional Dependencies in Linker options, if you are using MSVS) otherwise LLVM will try and use Interpreter instead of JIT. Hope this helps, Rob. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of kirill havok > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008

kirill havok wrote: > Hi Gordon, > I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to > execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? > I think the problem is that some_test_func() is a C++ function, so its name is being mangled during compilation. To fix it, I think you want to add a declaration telling the compiler to treat some_test_func()

Hi David, On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Fan Dawei <fandawei.s at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you please tell me more about $a, $t and $d symbols? How these symbols > are used to define different regions? Where I can find this symbols in ELF > object file? At the start of each range of ARM code, an assembler or compiler should produce a "$a" symbol with that address, and

Hi Jim, Thanks for reply. I'm sorry I didn't make myself clear enough. The MCInst created by MCDisassembler depends on the instructions defined in td files. These instructions do not have a one to one mapping to ARM instructions. There are usually one or more instructions defined in the td file correspond to one actual ARM instruction. Thanks, David On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Jim

Everyone, Progress was slow today. I started out well, but then I ran into Documentation.htm. Progress slowed considerably, as I analyzed the document structure. I''m up to /etc/shorewall/hosts Configuration. I hope to finish Documentation.xml by tomorrow evening. Converted documents: 6to4.xml CorpNetwork.xml FAQ.xml Please post feedback, if you see any problems with the converted