similar to: Instcombine Creating Illegal Code? (in LLVM 7)

Hi, I encountered an issue when attempting to create a call to function malloc. I just want to do a simple thing, suppose there is a variable p, if p is a pointer then allocate memory to p. Source code: int *p; p = (int *) malloc(sizeof(*p)); Try to generate LLVM IR for it: Type *tp = p->getType(); AllocaInst* arg_alloc = builder.CreateAlloca(tp);//builder is IRBuilder

shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net H=electric.blarg.net (mail.blarg.net) [206.124.128.61] It seems that i am no longer getting mail from the shorewall list, since i implemented a check if the HELO matches the reverse of the IP of the client. Now, I know ill have to make exceptions for a few hosts, but i thought i''d point out that the send-server for the shorewall list doesnt

Here are the details of my connection attempt: my computer: [jgrady at blarg jgrady]$ ssh -V SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0p1, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090581f). university server: bash$ ssh -V ssh: SSH Secure Shell 2.3.0 (non-commercial version) on mips-sgi-irix6.5 and the verbose output of my connection attempt: [jgrady at blarg jgrady]$ ssh -v xxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx SSH

The frontend code is a pretty simple for loop, that counts from i = 0; i != 10; i += 1 It gets optimized into and endless loop. export fn entry() void { var array: [10]Bar = undefined; var x = for (array) |elem, i| { if (i == 1) break elem; } else bar2(); } Here's the generated IR: ; ModuleID = 'test' source_filename = "test" target datalayout =

Something like this should work I think. ; ModuleID = 'test.ll' source_filename = "test.ll" define void @entry(<4 x i32>* %a, <4 x i32>* %b, <4 x i32>* %x) { Entry: %tmp = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32>* %a, align 16 %tmp1 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32>* %b, align 16 %tmp2 = add <4 x i32> %tmp, %tmp1 %tmpsign = icmp slt <4 x

I found this with LLVM 2.3 and reproduced with svn as of about thirty minutes ago and they both fail in the same way. If you run this code through opt -instcombine define fastcc i64 @fibo(i64) { switch i64 %0, label %2 [ i64 0, label %8 i64 1, label %8 ] ; <label>:2 ; preds = %1 %3 = sub i64 %0, 1 ; <i64> [#uses=1] %4 = call i64 @fibo(i64 %3) ; <i64> [#uses=1] %5 =

The attached is from my ISP (times are GMT -0800). This outage will impact: a) The mailing lists and mailing list archives. b) search of the Shorewall web site and list archives. I will be out of town when this outage occurs so I will have my fingers crossed that things will come back up ok. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.sf.net

On Oct 5, 2008, at 10:55 PM, Arnaud Bergeron wrote: > I found this with LLVM 2.3 and reproduced with svn as of about thirty > minutes ago and they both fail in the same way. > > If you run this code through opt -instcombine Your input code has undefined behavior. You have to mark the callsite as fastcc also. -Chris

I''ve opened up development of Shorewall 4.1. While I had previously announced that Shorewall 4.1 would focus on IPv6, I have since learned that the netfilter team are developing ''xtables'', a unified IP0v4/IPv6 utility. It seems silly to spend the effort to add Shorewall support for IPv6 only to then have to turn around and convert it to use xtables. So I''ve

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-06-19 8:45 GMT-07:00 Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > >> Greetings, >> >> I have a Zig implementation of ceil which is emitted into LLVM IR like >> this: >> >> ; Function Attrs: nobuiltin nounwind >> define

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 --- Comment #48 from Daniel Richard G. <skunk at iSKUNK.ORG> --- (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #47) > > There might be a few cases that we've missed, but please give > -current a spin and let us know if it has fixed all keyscan crashes > that you were seeing previously (I think it should...) Hi Damien, thank you

Greetings, I have a Zig implementation of ceil which is emitted into LLVM IR like this: ; Function Attrs: nobuiltin nounwind define internal fastcc float @ceil(float) unnamed_addr #3 !dbg !644 { Entry: %x = alloca float, align 4 store float %0, float* %x call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata float* %x, metadata !649, metadata !494), !dbg !651 %1 = load float, float* %x, !dbg !652 %2 =

I have created the function prototype with the following code: const uintmax_t methodNameSize = 1024; const char methodNameTemplate[] = "llvm.memcpy.p0i%llu.p0i%llu.i%llu"; char methodName[methodNameSize]; // Create the methodName. memset(methodName, 0, methodNameSize); sprintf(methodName, methodNameTemplate, dstSize, srcSize, lengthSize); // Search for the

On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:03 AM, F van der Meeren wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question, what is wrong with the following code? > > declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64*, i64*, i8, i32, i1) nounwind > > ... > > call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64* %19, i64* %21, i8 %17, i32 0, i1 false) > > ... > > > According to the compiler this is the

Below is attached a full IR module that can reproduce this issue, but the part to notice is this: %Foo96Bits = type <{ i24, i24, i24, i24 }> define internal fastcc i16 @main.0.1() unnamed_addr #2 !dbg !113 { Entry: %value = alloca %Foo96Bits, align 1 %b = alloca i24, align 4 %0 = bitcast %Foo96Bits* %value to i8*, !dbg !129 call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* %0, i8* bitcast

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 6:25 PM Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > The add/sub (+mul) overflow intrinsics are being updated to support > vectors to match the related add/sub saturation intrinsics. We haven't > updated the docs yet as legalization, vectorization and various minor bits > of plumbing still need to be finished before it can be officially supported

Hello. I have installed the ext3 file system on a test system, and sometimes I have a problem: I get an assert from within jbd-kernel.c, and whatever prgram was writing to the disk when this happens is unable to continue. The system is a server I built, which I named "dax". It is running Debian unstable, and I updated it to all the latest packages in Debian unstable as of today.

Hello, I have a question, what is wrong with the following code? declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64*, i64*, i8, i32, i1) nounwind ... call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i64.p0i64.i8(i64* %19, i64* %21, i8 %17, i32 0, i1 false) ... According to the compiler this is the error, but I seem to miss where exactly my fault is. Intrinsic prototype has incorrect number of arguments! void (i64*,

We''re trying to deploy our system on a separate server and have run into nothing but trouble; specifically I get the error mentioned in the subject. The username/password combo is correct (I verified it via SQL+). Manually running script/server works fine in production or development mode. Heck, running script/console also works fine. It''s just that when it automatically

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 --- Comment #53 from Daniel Richard G. <skunk at iSKUNK.ORG> --- (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #52) > That patch is committed now - can you retry with -current? I tried the same snapshot with your revised patch (before seeing the above comment), and got this error two-for-two: [...] # blarg.internal.example.com