similar to: Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols (Attr Internal/Common)

Looks like this is indeed related to r360841. In C, there are distinctions between declarations, definitions and tentative definitions. Global variables declared with "extern" are declarations. Global variables that don't have "extern" and have initializers are definitions. If global variables have neither "extern" nor initializers, they are called tentative

Hi Teresa, Can you please let me know if there is any update on this issue. Thanks M Suresh From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 7:23 PM To: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> Cc: Mani, Suresh <Suresh.Mani at amd.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols

Thanks for the info Teresa, Regards M Suresh From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 7:15 PM To: Mani, Suresh <Suresh.Mani at amd.com> Cc: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols (Attr Internal/Common) [CAUTION: External

The direct cause of this issue is that, previously lld converted common symbols to defined symbols before passing input files to LTO, and after r360841 they are passed as common symbols to LTO. Making lld to work as before is easy, as we can convert common symbols to defined symbols as before. Here is a patch to do that, and I confirmed that that restores the original behavior for the reported

Hello, Here is a patch for protocol_subnet.c with two modifications : - in tunnelserver mode, tinc must check subnets in the ".../hosts/owner" config file, not in "c->config_tree" (which is the configuration of the meta-connection from which we receive the ADD_SUBNET message). - this checking can be made before the check of the owner, especially before any

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them

The type of some functions that return only 0 is changed to ''void''. In addition, the check on the return value in the caller of these functions becomes unnecessary. So, these check is removed. Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 17 ++++-------- fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 4 +- fs/btrfs/compression.c | 14 ++++------

hello folks, Im trying to clean out a large file with data i dont need. The column im manipulating in the file is called "legal_status" There are three kinds of rows i want to remove. Those that have "Private", "Private (Op", or "Unknown" in the legal_status column. I wrote this code but i get errors and it says im missing a TRUE/ False thingy...im

Hello, I am using R to train a logistic regression model and save the resulting model to disk. I am then subsequently reloading these saved objects, and using predict.glm on them in order to make predictions about single-row data frames that are generated in real-time from requests arriving at an HTTP server. The following code demonstrates the sort of R calls that I have in mind: > cases

This is a first draft of a subvolume quota implementation. It is possible to limit subvolumes and any group of subvolumes and also to track the amount of space that will get freed when deleting snapshots. The current version is functionally incomplete, with the main missing feature being the initial scan and rescan of an existing filesystem. I put some effort into writing an introduction into

On 2019-10-28 4:10 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> > > Remove the interval tree in the driver and rely on the tree maintained by > the mmu_notifier for delivering mmu_notifier invalidation callbacks. > > For some reason amdgpu has a very complicated arrangement where it tries > to prevent duplicate entries in the interval_tree,

nv50_bo_move_m2mf might copy to tiled gart, in which case linear copy is not appropriate. --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c index 88f0c45..0daf3f0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c +++

Am 28.10.19 um 21:10 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> > > Remove the interval tree in the driver and rely on the tree maintained by > the mmu_notifier for delivering mmu_notifier invalidation callbacks. > > For some reason amdgpu has a very complicated arrangement where it tries > to prevent duplicate entries in the interval_tree,

Hello, I have been having difficulty getting boxplot to give the output I want - probably a result of the way I have been handling the data. The data is arranged in columns: each date has two sets of data. The number of data points varies with the date, so each column is of different length. I want to get a series of boxplots with the date along the x-axis, with alternating colors, so that it

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> Remove the interval tree in the driver and rely on the tree maintained by the mmu_notifier for delivering mmu_notifier invalidation callbacks. For some reason amdgpu has a very complicated arrangement where it tries to prevent duplicate entries in the interval_tree, this is not necessary, each amdgpu_bo can be its own stand alone entry.

Hi, I run R 2.10.1 under ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) and klaR version 0.6-4. I compute a model over a 2 classes dataset (composed of 700 examples). To that aim, I use the function NaiveBayes provided in the package klaR. When I then use the prediction function : predict(my_model, new_data). I get the following warning : "In FUN(1:747[[747L]], ...) : Numerical 0 probability with

Nelly Reduan a partag? un fichier OneDrive avec vous. Pour l?afficher, cliquez sur le lien ci-dessous. <https://1drv.ms/u/s!Apkg2VlgfYyDgRAeVIM0nEajx0Fb> [https://r1.res.office365.com/owa/prem/images/dc-png_20.png]<https://1drv.ms/u/s!Apkg2VlgfYyDgRAeVIM0nEajx0Fb> Screenshot 2017-11-12 18.49.43.png<https://1drv.ms/u/s!Apkg2VlgfYyDgRAeVIM0nEajx0Fb> Hello How can I perform

Hi, I'm not very experienced with R and struggle with data selection from a long matrix with two columns. I want to cut out the data between x > 0 and min(y). > x <- c(-10, -5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20) > y <- c(10, 10, 10, -5, -6, -7, 10) > data <- as.matrix( cbind(x, y) ) > data x y [1,] -10 10 [2,] -5 10 [3,] 0 10 _ [4,] 5 -5 |-- data interval [5,] 10 -6

Hemant We''ve continued testing our application with backgroundrb and found a couple of other problems when transfering large amounts of data. Both of these problems are still present in the github version of code. The first problem is an exception in the Marshal.load call in the receive_data method in the Packet::MetaPimp class. The root cause is in the BinParser module, in the arm of

Author: mike_s Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e144729d8b901f4092085ea17a31bf10d1089f79 Log message: 6273860 gcc and sgs/gprof don''t get along 6273866 gcc and sgs/prof don''t get along Files: update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/Makefile.com update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/common/arcs.c update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/common/dfn.c update: usr/src/cmd/sgs/gprof/common/gprof.c