similar to: Need help on identifying a patch which fixed lld on linux platform

Thanks for the info Rui. Transitioning from llvm 5.0 to llvm 7.0 will take some time due to the nature/process of the production environment. Is it ok to use lld 7.0 with llvm 5.0? On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:47 PM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Looks like Ubuntu 12 was released in 2012, and the most recent version of > LLVM is LLVM 8.0.0. > > LLVM 5.0 is pretty old,

Any easy way to do this as some kind of overlay, so they GN files wouldn't live in the LLVM repository, but in a separate one? (this might avoid some of the community discussion - though would perhaps still likely have the issue I see as most significant: With a sufficient number of developers using GN, the rate of build breaks due to those developers missing CMake file updates might rise to

The value in having them somewhere in-tree is that it's easier for people collaborate on these files, and it's way lower setup overhead if someone wants to try it out. If people prefer llvm/util over llvm/experimental, that's fine with me. There would only be a single directory that will contain build files for all of llvm, clang, lld, etc. The build files would be in

Awesome. I'm happy with moving the .rst file into that directory and not have it on the public website. I'll try to make a patch that lands enough scaffolding to build `not` in the next few days, and then I'll land the other build files I have through the regular build process after that. Unless someone feels strongly, I'll go with Justin's suggestion of llvm/utils/gn/... On

If I read this correctly, there isn't much opposition to landing the gn files as long as it's very clear that regular devs aren't supposed to update them and that it's clear that they're experimental The main concerns I've heard so far: - Having two build systems is confusing. I can see this, but I think putting the gn files below llvm/experimental/gn (instead of right

Dear people, I'm trying to do some analysis of a data using the models by Royle & Donazio in their fantastic book, particular the following function: http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/pubanalysis/roylebook/panel4pt1.fn that applied to my data and in the console is as follows: > `desman.y` <- structure(c(3L,4L,3L,2L,1L), .Names = c("1", "2", "3",

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:22 AM Vedant Kumar via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > >> On Oct 31, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> first things first: If you're happy with cmake, you can stop reading now. >> I'm not, I just put up with it :) > ...

gReetings: I apologize for the non-programming language. I found what seems to be a strange behavior of plot(). The code follows: #_____________________________ N=3030; gn=.04; tn=1:100 n=N/(1+(N-1)*exp(-gn*tn)) N=n*(1-exp(-gn*tn))/(1-n*exp(-gn*tn)) plot(N) #strange plot N N=rep(3030, 100) plot(N) #behaves as expected ________________________________ Windows XP, R 2.4.0. or 2.4.1 Thanks,

Why does GN bot still send mails? I thought it got fixed? On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:44 PM <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> wrote: > > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn while building llvm. > Full details are available at: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn/builds/1820 > > Buildbot URL:

Hi, I need to get an overview over the memory/speed requirements for speex. We want to investigate whether we can implement on a target processor with limited resources. The target processor is a 16 bit fixed pint DSP with a single ALU and MAC. It runs at 60 MHz and has a total of 16 Kbytes RAM from which other processing also will eat. What we would like to implement is a speex encoder and

vitalybuka, sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn is _still_ on http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console . Can we please get it removed? On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:07 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D63909 landed. Maybe it needs a master restart > to have an effect? > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:03 PM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: >

Why is there a public GN buildbot that sends emails and IRC notifications? That isn't what was agreed upon. Either un-GM it, or silence it. Roman. On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 1:05 AM <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> wrote: > > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn while building llvm. > Full details are available at: >

Hi, I am trying to convert the following NLMIXED code to NLME, but am running into problems concerning 'Singularity in backsolve'. As I am new to R/S-Plus, I thought I may be missing something in the NLME code. NLMIXED *********** proc nlmixed data=kidney.kidney; parms delta=0.03 gamma=1.1 b1=-0.003 b2=-1.2 b3=0.09 b4=0.35 b5=-1.43 varu=0.5; eta=b1*age+b2*sex+b3*gn+b4*an+b5*pkn+u;

Hello, I was wondering who owns the clang.exp bots which builds llvm using gn? I need to add another generator to clang-tablegen, but the build seems to be failing: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn/builds/4816 I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look at the problem. Thank you, Nandor Licker

Dear users, I'm using rpart for classification trees, but my code isn't working when I try to use all the variables in my data frame. This data frame was created from a data frame with 1775 variables, but I choose only 13. arv13<-rpart(iv~.,data=gn,method="class",parms=list(split="information")) #Error: Error in `[.data.frame`(frame, predictors) : undefined

On 03/05/2018 11:01 AM, William Dunlap via R-devel wrote: > In R-3.5.0 you can use ...length(): > > f <- function(..., n) ...length() > > f(stop("one"), stop("two"), stop("three"), n=7) > [1] 3 > > Prior to that substitute() is the way to go > > g <- function(..., n) length(substitute(...())) > >

Dear all, I am running R 2.4.1. > library(siggenes); > library(multtest); > cl<-rep(c(0,1),c(3,3)); > sub<-exprs(AffyExpData[,c(1:3,7:9)]); > gn<-geneNames(AffyRAwData); > sam.out<-sam(sub,cl,rand=123,gene.names=gn); We're doing 20 complete permutations > sam.out SAM Analysis for the Two-Class Unpaired Case Assuming Unequal Variances Delta p0

Hi Wynand, My big concern is related to what Mehdi mentioned as #4. Bazel doesn't really handle the configuration-management that CMake does, so adding Bazel support would really mean supporting an extra build system with no path for it to replace CMake. We're kinda already in that situation with gn, but gn is a developer productivity tool and we don't consider changes that break gn

Hi, I'm a new R user and would appreciate your help regarding the following: Can I create a matrix whose elements are n functions of a vector x? In my problem I have 3 vectors (a,b,c) with elements a=[f1(x) f2(x)....fn(x)]; b=[g1(x) g2(x)....gn(x)]; c=[h1(x) h2(x)....hn(x)]. I need to create a final function that looks like: f(x)=f1(x)*g1(x)*h1(x)+.....+fn(x)*gn(x)*hn(x). (f(x) is my

Hello, Please have a look at the code below, which I use to read in the attached file. As line 18 of the file reads "1065:>sp|Q9V3T9|ADRO_DROME NADPH:adrenodoxin oxidoreductase, mitochondrial OS=Drosophila melanogaster GN=dare PE=2 SV=1", I expect the code below to produce a 3 column data frame with most of the last column empty and line 18 to produce a data.frame row like so: