Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "TableGen crash when building LLVM with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled"
2017 Sep 07
3
'-fsave-optimization-record' and VS2015 built compiler
Not 100% if this is an LLVM question or a CLang question, though I expect LLVM.
On Linux, if I pass '-fsave-optimization-record' to 'clang', then it produces a '*.opt.yaml' file. However, the same thing run on Windows using 'clang' built with VS2015 silently ignores this option.
Is this a bug or is it intentional? And if it is intentional, how can I configure
2017 Oct 03
2
'cl::opt' and range checking
Hi LLVM-Devs,
The LLVM 'cl::opt' templates are really useful, and provide a lot of flexibility. But I don't see any support for ranged options. What I would like is to have an option which is an integer type, and to restrict the set of values provided to a simple upper and lower bound, for example between 10 and 2000.
Is there a way of expressing this with the 'cl::opt'
2018 Jan 25
4
Adding a new target to 'llvm-lld'
Hi LLVM-Devs,
I am considering switching to using 'llvm-lld' instead of Gnu 'ld' in a future revision of our out-of-tree target, and I am wondering is there a getting started guide for how to go about extending 'llvm-lld' to support an additional target.
Thanks,
MartinO
--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Research and Development
2017 Sep 29
2
Change in optimisation with UB in mind
With LLVM v5.0, I found failures in some of the 'gcc.c-torture/execute' tests due to a change in the optimisation where undefined behaviour is involved. The tests that fail are the '20040409-[123].c' tests.
The underlying failure is due to the optimisation of the following:
int test2(int x) { return x + INT_MIN; }
from using an ADD instruction to using an OR instruction.
2017 Dec 19
3
DBG_VALUE insertion for spills breaks bundles
Hi,
The insertion of DBG_VALUE instructions for spills does not seem to be handling insert locations inside bundles well. If the spill instruction is part of a bundle, the new DBG_VALUE is inserted after it, but does not have the bundling flags set. This essentially means that if we start with a set of bundled instructions:
MI1 [BundledSucc=true, BundledPred=false]
MI2 [BundledSucc=false,
2017 Jul 18
3
PGO, zlib and 'default.profraw'
We are trying to get PGO working for our embedded out-of-tree target, but the utility 'llvm-profdata' does not like the data we are giving it.
Because this is not a hosted environment, we have to off-chip the profiling data ourselves, and although the data looks okay, 'llvm-profdata' reports the following error:
llvm-profdata show -all-functions -counts -detailed-summary -text
2017 Aug 24
3
duplicated notifications for suspend and resume
Hello,
I am using domain event notifications from libvirt-event API in my application and it seems to work fine, except for 'suspend' and 'resume' events where I keep receiving duplicated notifications.
Similarly, the example provided with libvirt (in examples/object-events/event-test) also produces twice as much notifications for 'suspend' and 'resume' than for
2017 Oct 03
2
Change in optimisation with UB in mind
Yes, the hairy-edges of undefined behaviour - UB is UB.
It does mean that given:
__attribute__((noinline)) int foo(int a, int b) { return a + b; }
int bar1(int x) { return foo(x, INT_MIN); }
int bar2(int x) { return x + INT_MIN; }
'bar1' and 'bar2' have different outcomes.
However, I think that the new optimisation is neat and valid and I am not suggesting that it should
2017 Mar 06
1
Re: domain reinitalization detection
> Listen to the events
I guess that would require running my own polling thread, right ? I wanted to avoid that ...
Thanks for help
On 06.03.2017 14:14, Matczak, KrzysztofX wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to find out how to detect if domain was destroyed and brought up between two time moments, let's call it reads.
> So far the best approach I could find is to compare
2017 Dec 12
3
File/module scope inline assembly
I am trying to support an experimental DSL that uses non-C identifiers, but I want to write the implementation of the runtime support libraries for this DSL in C. The compiler is built using the LLVM v5.0.0 release branch.
To do this I thought I could simply write:
int foo() { return 42; } // The C implementation
asm(".alias nonCname foo"); // Make the non-C name be a synonym for
2017 Dec 22
0
DBG_VALUE insertion for spills breaks bundles
Hi again,
Here is a small patch to fix this issue. Please note that since the problem results in broken bundles, it can result in invalid schedules for any VLIW back-ends using bundling to group instructions.
Best regards
Saurabh Verma
From: Verma, Saurabh
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 4:14 PM
To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: DBG_VALUE insertion for spills breaks bundles
Hi,
The
2017 Oct 03
2
Change in optimisation with UB in mind
Hi Sanjoy,
Yes these are C tests (from 'gcc.c-torture/execute'), and as I indicated in my original message, the tests are not valid because the behaviour is undefined. However, it was while investigating these new failures in these tests that I realised that this optimisation existed.
The optimisation itself is perfectly valid, but it does mean that integer underflow will no longer be
2017 Mar 08
2
events dispatching in synchronous mode
Hi
Is there any way to get events dispatching in synchronous mode ?
I mean I'm running my own events polling loop which calls virEventRunDefaultImpl each turn . I'd expect to get my callback function called synchronously , but it's not . Seems that's async call.
Maybe it's my general misunderstanding and I shouldn't use virEventRunDefaultImpl for that ?
Thanks in
2017 Jul 18
4
PGO, zlib and 'default.profraw'
Can we improve the error message here? We should be able to check
zlib::isAvailable and give an error like "profile uses zlib compression
but the profile reader was built without zlib support" or so in this
case.
Xinliang David Li via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> The __llvm_prf_names section is compressed but your llvm-profdata tool is
> probably not built
2018 Jan 25
0
Adding a new target to 'llvm-lld'
I'm not aware of a written guide either. In 2016 I did a talk on that
subject at the LLVM Cauldron
(http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-09/#schedule) although quite a bit has
changed since then so I'm hesitant to recommend it apart from general
principles.
I can't speak for the COFF side as I've only worked on the ELF side of
LLD; my suggestions on where to start:
- Properties of the
2017 Jul 18
2
PGO, zlib and 'default.profraw'
set LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB=ON with cmake invocation. zlib should be installed
and zlib.h header file needs to be in the header search path.
Is your llvm-profdata tool built together with clang?
David
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> How can I build the profile reader with ZLIB support enabled? I configure
> and
2018 Jan 18
2
CTPOP and zeroes
Quick question. The 'ISD::CTPOP' node allows a target to lower the counting of ones in a word to a single instruction. Our target also has an instruction for counting the zeroes in a word. Does CTPOP support counting of zeroes as well as ones instead of doing either "CTPOP(INVERT(operand))" or "N-bits - CTPOP(operand)"?
Thanks,
MartinO
2017 Jul 25
2
PGO, zlib and 'default.profraw'
Hi David,
When I use CMake to configure, ‘zlib’ and its header are detected - I build on CentOS 6.5 or CentOS 7. Since I run CMake from the command-line, I tried added ‘-DLLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB=0’ and ‘-DLLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB=1’ (using ‘-DLLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB=ON’ does not seem to work). Both ‘clang’ and ‘llvm-profdata’ (and all other tools and utilities) are configured and built together, in any event,
2017 Jul 13
2
How to add custom instrumentation?
Hi everyone,
I run some functions using ORC JIT, now I need to add custom instrumentation.
I want to add two callbacks to each function: ‘enterFunction' at the beginning and ‘leaveFunction' at the end.
Intuition says that I could ‘just' insert CallInst's to the first and the last basic blocks in the function.
Am I correct? Are there any other/better way to do this? Is there
2019 May 10
2
[Pipeliner] MachinePipeliner TargetInstrInfo hooks need more information?
Hello,
I'm working on integrating the MachinePipeliner.cpp pass into our VLIW
backend, and so far we've managed to get it working with some nice
speedups.
Unlike Hexagon however, our backend doesn't generate hardware loop
instructions and so all our loops are a combination of induction
variables, comparisons and branches. So when it came to implementing
reduceLoopCount for our