similar to: Copy Function from one LLVM IR file to another

Hi everyone, I am trying to replace the call of a certain function with a call to another function. It would for example replace the following: %call = tail call noalias i8* @func(i64 10) by %call = tail call noalias i8* @other_func(i64 10) I managed to declare other_func correctly but I am having troubles to understand how I should proceed to do the replacement. I tried to use

Hi, Thanks both of you for the help. I just missed that Create function had many optional arguments... sorry for that. However my problem wasn't coming from here (IRBuilder CreateCall function still return a pointer to CallInst so I just added 2 times the call?). I didn't wanted to detail the all issue previously because I knew I had a problem with my syntax. So here's my problem: I

Hi James, Thanks for your quick reply. > I assume because you asked this question, something went wrong when using the above method. What was it? :) No, I am not using this method. I was trying to create a llvm::GetElementPtrInst . I didn't create IRBuilder. I am writing a ModulePass that insert new instruction to an existing Module. Besides, how can you get a reference to myreg1 ?

Hello, I have a call to ReplaceInstWithInst(Instruction *From, Instruction *To) inside of a for loop iterating through a BasicBlock::iterator. On the very next pass after I replace the instruction, the iterator appears to be invalidated. Is this supposed to happen or am I doing something silly? Is there a more appropriate way to do this? Thanks, -Justin

Hi all, I want to find memory dependency between CallInst instruction and other. So i used the following code: * AliasAnalysis &AA=getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();* * if(isa<StoreInst>(inst1)){* * ** **if(isa<CallInst>(inst2))**{* * CallInst *call_inst2= dyn_cast<CallInst>(inst2); * * if(AA.getModRefInfo(inst1,call_inst2)==mod)**{* *

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:13:04PM -0600, Tanya Brethour wrote: > > I have been looking over the doxygen documentation as well as the > > llvm code. Is there a standard way to check to see if two > > instructions are identical (i.e., Inst1 == Inst2 does not work)? > > If you want to check if two instructions are the same instruction, you > should be able to just

I am trying to change this define void @main(float* noalias %arg0, float* noalias %arg1, float* noalias %arg2) { entrypoint: %0 = bitcast float* %arg1 to <4 x float>* intothis define void @main(float* noalias %arg0, float* noalias %arg1, float* noalias %arg2) { entrypoint: %0 = getelementptr float* %arg1, i64 0 %1 = bitcast float* %0 to <4 x float>* I must be close but

I've got a suggestion for a refinement: Right now, we have classes like DILocation that wrap an MDNode* to provide more convenient access to it. It would be more convenient for users if instead of MDNode *DbgInfo = Inst->getMD(MDKind::DbgTag); Inst2->setMD(MDKind::DbgTag, DbgInfo); they could write: DILocation DbgInfo = Inst->getMD<DILocation>();

Thanks for the quick reply, Owen. I went through the code in MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp again. Since DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*> maps a BasicBlock to a single Value (Instruction) and it is populated by a DFS on the reverse Control Flow Graph starting at the query instruction's block, is it correct to say that the last dependent instruction in each visited basic block is what is

Hi neda 8664, > I want to find memory dependency between CallInst instruction and other. So i > used the following code: > > > > / AliasAnalysis &AA=getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();/ > > /*if* (isa< StoreInst >(inst1)){ / > > // // /*if* (isa<CallInst>(inst2)) / /{/ > > / CallInst *call_inst2= dyn_cast<CallInst>(inst2); /

Hi, This is probably more of a standard C++ question instead of an actual LLVM question, but here it goes anyway. I'm trying to invoke the following constructor: CallInst::CallInst(Value *Func, InputIterator ArgBegin, InputIterator ArgEnd, const Twine &NameStr, BasicBlock *InsertAtEnd); My code is: using namespace llvm; void replaceByClone(Function *f, CallInst *I){ Function *clone =

I have been looking over the doxygen documentation as well as the llvm code. Is there a standard way to check to see if two instructions are identical (i.e., Inst1 == Inst2 does not work)? Thanks, Brian Brian M. Fahs Graduate Student University of Illinois

Hi, I'm a PhD student doing phase ordering as part of my PhD topic and I would like to ask some questions about LLVM. Executing the following command to see what passes does OPT execute when targeting a SPARC V8 processor: /opt/clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-15.10/bin/llvm-as < /dev/null | /opt/clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-15.10/bin/opt -O3 -march=sparc -mcpu=v8

> I have been looking over the doxygen documentation as well as the llvm > code. Is there a standard way to check to see if two instructions are > identical (i.e., Inst1 == Inst2 does not work)? If you want to check if two instructions are the same instruction, you should be able to just compare pointers. -Tanya

I'm posting this message in charge of Denis MARS (France), because he is not a subscriber of teh list and I worked with him about the same problem. Domenico Viggiani ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I worked on this problem since three weeks and now i really give up. Clearly i can't go further without your help. I hesitate to send you this bug

LLVM is built in Release mode. The version is 6.0.0. I think that a similar code worked on verison 3.9.0. It is probably a null pointer dereference occurring in eraseFromParent(). I checked and reconfirmed that the instruction had no uses. Perhaps I should rebuild LLVM. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:03 PM, mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Hmmmm that’s strange. Do you get an

Hello All - Any recommendations or suggestions for neat ways to visualize data taken from a 3-axis accelerometer? My study species is aquatic, so I would be interested in movement in the 3 dimensions in addition to being able to incorporate the time series as well. Is there a package in R that might be useful for this? Thank you in advance, Jen ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jennifer Maresh, PhD

On Friday 11 September 2009 15:20, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > I've got a suggestion for a refinement: > > Right now, we have classes like DILocation that wrap an MDNode* to > provide more convenient access to it. It would be more convenient for > users if instead of > > MDNode *DbgInfo = Inst->getMD(MDKind::DbgTag); > Inst2->setMD(MDKind::DbgTag, DbgInfo); >

Hi, I have the following instruction in my IR- %call2 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %1, i8* %2) #2 I intend to change call to strcpy with strncpy. I have included the following code in runOnFunction, so that when it is strcpy's turn to be invoked, strncpy is invoked instead. Assuming I* is the strcpy instruction, CallInst* x=new

Hi,I have the following instruction in my IR-%call2 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %1, i8* %2) #2I intend to change call to strcpy with strncpy. I have included the following code in runOnFunction, so that when it is strcpy's turn to be invoked, strncpy is invoked instead.Assuming I* is the strcpy instruction,CallInst* x=new