similar to: PowerPC big-endian tests breakage

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > This change broke the gcc compile farm bots. On the compile farm, gcc is > normally around version 4.4. However, gcc 4.8.2 is available in the > non-default directory /opt/cfarm/gcc-latest/bin > > Maybe we can adapt the buildbots to find it there. > > @Duncan, do you have time to do so? >

Hi, I have a LSI Logic sata/sas raid running, is there a way to see the state of the volume, like optimal, degraded or resyncing? I've tried several commands with camcontrol but I cant figure it out. -- Peter Ankerst?l peter@pean.org http://www.pean.org/

Greetings, starting a new thread and CC-ing all the folks I could think of that are likely running bots for LLVM. If I've missed any, sorry, please add them. As lots of folks have been mentioning, it's time to switch LLVM (and most subprojects) to use C++11. The first step is establishing a new baseline of compiler versions that are supported[1]: MSVC 2012 GCC 4.7 Clang 3.1 If you are

i cannot read or write any disk inserted in my acd0 <PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-111D/1.29> when this device in udma mode. kernel endlessly repeat that acd0: setting up DMA failed and I can access my data on dvd or cd only if I set atacontrol mode acd0 pio4 Does anybody have such a problem too? is there any ways to bring this device into udma mode again? dmesg: ... atapci1: <ATI IXP600

On Mar 19, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > I would like to see: > > (1) LLVM testsuite run every night for all targets, target variants > and > operating systems, for example by using an emulator to emulate targets > for which the hardware is not available. The gcc project has a > compile > farm which might be usable for this, but we would need to ask them

LLVM ARM v6 backend is in fairly good shape. Even the JIT passes nearly the entire llvm test suite. There are some known missing bits: 1. Exception handling 2. Atomic Not sure: 3. Debugging support (should be trivial to hook up if it's not done) Also the thumb backend is not awesome. Its performance is not great. Evan On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Robert Schuster wrote: > Hi, > the

Hi, the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of LLVM is generally in its early stages of development. I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to be unstable and the like. Thanks in advance for taking the time. Regards Robert -------------- next part -------------- A

On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > This nightly tester is now using an llvm-g++ that produces the new > ODR linkage > types. This means that many more functions are being considered by > the > inter-procedural optimization passes (for example, "linkonce" > functions defined > in a header). The result seems to be pretty huge swings (both good

Hi Chris, > Can you check to see if the stepanov_container/fftbench regressions > are real? If so, it would be very interesting to know what is "going > wrong" on them. I think these may not be real. This version of llvm-gcc was built with checking enabled - does this turn on checking in libstdc++? It seems that a bunch of linkonce libstdc++ checking code is now being

This nightly tester is now using an llvm-g++ that produces the new ODR linkage types. This means that many more functions are being considered by the inter-procedural optimization passes (for example, "linkonce" functions defined in a header). The result seems to be pretty huge swings (both good and bad) in the C++ tests in the testsuite, see below. Note that this tester is often

Hi all, I have had this problem since day 1 on my new server. It has run since November 15th 2008, and serve approx. 10 GB worth of web traffic per month for the main site and then some 40 domains with mail and small web pages. (hence - it's NOT that busy yet) I started with 7.1-RELEASE-pX since I didn't have problems straight off - but it didn't last long. After a few days of

Hello, today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the nvidia-module. Error-message from dkms: Compiler version check failed: The major and minor number of the compiler used to compile the kernel: gcc version 8.3.1 20190311 (Red Hat 8.3.1-3) (GCC) does not match the compiler used here: cc (GCC)

Hi Brian, > Thank you for this collection of patches. > > How can I test them? What platforms (computers) have the ppc64 or > POWER9 processor? The IBM Bounty Source page has a list of resources: https://www.bountysource.com/teams/ibm/bounties Travis also has ppc64le support, so if you add the linux-ppc64le target then FLAC will be tested on ppc64le. Thanks, Anton

> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER >> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware >> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! > > Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest > supercomputer in the

Thanks. More below. > On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Justin Clift <justin at postgresql.org> wrote: > > Not sure personally, as I've not touched the libcxx source before. Looking > at line 876 for libcxx/include/chrono, gives this: > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d2298e74235598f15594fe2c99bbac870a507c59/libcxx/include/chrono#L876

The following series adds initial vector support for PowerPC64. On POWER9, flac --best is about 3.3x faster. Amitay Isaacs (2): Add m4 macro to check for C __attribute__ features Check if compiler supports target attribute on ppc64 Anton Blanchard (5): configure.ac: Remove SPE detection code configure.ac: Add VSX enable/disable configure.ac: Fix FLAC__CPU_PPC on little endian, and add

I''m attempting to assign ActiveRecord Observers to some of my models, specified in config/environment.rb like so, config.active_record.observers = :presentation_observer, :asset_observer, :tag_observer My models use plugins which extend ActiveRecord::Base, including Sebastian Kanthak''s file_column Attempting to boot mongrel yields:

Been playing around with Samba as a domain controller a lot lately, with a rather nice setup. Latest samba and openldap backend, running on hardware SATA raid 5, with for the moment the only shares on XFS /home partition ontop of LVM running XFS quotas. It's all nice and spangley, expect for one thing.. It completely breaks when saving the roaming profile at logoff, and the quota is reached.

Hi, src/unix/Rscript.c on R trunk stopped building with a compiler error of "unknown not defined/declared" on line 160-ish, where R_SVN_REVISION is , on my system. I see trunk r60972, trunk r60975 changes R_SVN_REVISION to a number - if it can be found, from being a string. The thing is, I track R development with git's svn support (which IMHO works far better). So svn info cannot

The getpwd() function in dash assumed than getcwd(0, 0) will allocate the buffer dynamically using malloc(); however, this glibc extension is not implemented by klibc. Make getpwd() use a temporary buffer and invoke savestr() itself instead of relying on a nonstandard extension. Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu at altlinux.ru> --- Alternatively, you may pull from the following git repo