similar to: RFC: "REQUIRES: no*" considered harmful

Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> writes: > Can you put something in the release notes when this happens? I already updated the release notes in r268693, when I added the void Select option in the first place :) > Thanks, > Hans > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Update: All in tree

On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 20:20:00 +0100 Peter Eriksson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Our setup: > Windows AD realm with ~115K users (and numerous groups etc) > FreeBSD servers with Samba 4.7.6 and Samba 4.9.3 (both show the same > growth) > > We just noticed that one of the ‘winbindd’ daemons on the servers > seems to be growing and growing forever. A bit of

Update: All in tree backends now implement `void Select`. I'll be removing the SelectImpl path on Monday. Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: > TLDR: Heads up for out of tree backends - you're going to need to update > your *DAGToDAGISel::Select method to unconditionally replace nodes > directly instead of returning the desired replacement. > > So I'm

Can you put something in the release notes when this happens? Thanks, Hans On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Update: All in tree backends now implement `void Select`. I'll be > removing the SelectImpl path on Monday. > > Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: >> TLDR: Heads up for out of

Hi Preston, On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at gmail.com> wrote: > > which produces > > %arrayidx24 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i64]]* %A, i64 > %arrayidx21.sum, i64 %add1411, i64 %add > store i64 0, i64* %arrayidx24, align 8 > {{{(5 + ((3 + %n) * %n)),+,(2 * %n * %n)}<%for.cond1.preheader>,+,(4 *

TLDR: Heads up for out of tree backends - you're going to need to update your *DAGToDAGISel::Select method to unconditionally replace nodes directly instead of returning the desired replacement. So I'm working on fixing the undefined behaviour I described in llvm.org/PR26808. As part of this, we need to stop looking into deleted SDNodes to check if they were, in fact, deleted. A big place

I ran across a problem today in which some code ran fine in regular operation but failed in a test case. I scratched my head and thought "why would running from within the test harness change the behavior of my code?" Clearly it was the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in action! :) I discovered the root cause was that the rspec runner is setting the magical ruby global, $KCODE, to

I''m trying to get really serious about doing true BDD for a new Rails project, and I note that at <http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/ rails/index.html> it says: "we really don?t recommend the use of rails fixtures" On the same page it also says (about Model specs): "these are the only specs that we feel should actually interact with the database"

Hi Preston, >>> As noted in the GEP FAQ, GEPs don't support variable-length arrays; >> >> that's not quite right. The problem is only with arrays of variable length >> arrays, and more generally with arrays where the element type has variable >> size (this occurs with Ada, which has all kinds of funky variable sized types, >> for example). > >

I am considering installing a Puppet agent on a legacy server running an old, crappy, slow, leaky, yet important Java app. Nervous about introducing anything that might (further) destabilize the app. What are people''s experiences with Puppet in terms of resource usage (CPU/ memory/network/etc)? For starters will likely run it on the standard daemon schedule. Ultimately may want to control

Virtiio_mmio attempts to mimic the layout of some control registers from virtio_pci. These registers, in particular VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_SEL and VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_SEL, are active in nature, and not just passive like a normal memory location. Thus, the host side must react immediately upon write of these registers to map some other registers (queue address, size, etc) to queue-specific

Virtiio_mmio attempts to mimic the layout of some control registers from virtio_pci. These registers, in particular VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_SEL and VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_SEL, are active in nature, and not just passive like a normal memory location. Thus, the host side must react immediately upon write of these registers to map some other registers (queue address, size, etc) to queue-specific

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=715 Summary: usage of BROKEN_SETREUID/BROKEN_SETREGID considered harmful Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo:

There is an ongoing thread "fontconfig-2.1.92 considered harmful" on -CURRENT. Because I have not moved to -CURRENT, I post this to -STABLE. Since I upgraded to fontconfig-2.1.93 (on Apr 14) a lot of ports start to complain a lot of "Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable" errors. What resource ? I inserted top into my ports build script to notice that a lot of

Duncan Sands wrote: >> As noted in the GEP FAQ, GEPs don't support variable-length arrays; > > that's not quite right. The problem is only with arrays of variable length > arrays, and more generally with arrays where the element type has variable > size (this occurs with Ada, which has all kinds of funky variable sized types, > for example). You're right, though

OpenSSH still has this feature, SSH-1.2.27 no longer has it. Admittedly it can be useful sometimes, even though I'd prefer this to be done using a trivial shell wrapper, which would be the UNIX way of doing things. Not being able to call OpenSSH's ssh by another name (say ``ssh1'') can get in the way when having to maintain two versions of ssh in parallel because the ``ssh ->

Hi folks, I am just getting into rails again after a multi-year stint of mod_perl jobs, which might grant me some newbie-indemnity for the time being - but I''ve found an issue I think warrants discussion. As discussed here - http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionController/RequestForgeryProtection/ClassMethods.html - the CSRF protection feature does not kick in for GET requests. This

I own an Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+. I enabled SVM extensions on BIOS. I did a power cycle. xm dmesg shows me: (XEN) AMD SVM: ASIDs enabled (XEN) HVM: SVM enabled I run a 64 bit Xen kernel (OpenSuse 11). Xen version is 3.2.1_16881_04-8.6 I _can not_ run any x86_64 O.S on a HVM domU, because it appears something like this: "your cpu does not support long mode. use a 32bit

Is there any chance of replacing/extending the GEP instruction? As noted in the GEP FAQ, GEPs don't support variable-length arrays; when the front ends have to support VLAs, they linearize the subscript expressions, throwing away information. The FAQ suggests that folks interested in writing an analysis that understands array indices (I'm thinking of dependence analysis) should be

Good evening, I have a problem: I set up samba on my home server to share some files. In my smb.conf I set to the shares "directory mode = 0775" and "create mode = 0664". So new files will have 664 permissions and new dirs 775 permissions. If I access to the smb shares over my file explorer and create files an dirs, they get the permissions on the server I set in the