similar to: Close PRs on GitHub repo

Hello, Just decided to check whether I am doing something that makes sense or not. I was thinking about how cool would it be to re-use examples (just like we reuse story scenarios with GivenScenario). I was not sure if this possibility already exists in rspec (and, honestly, was lazy to check), so I have created this helper: def given_it(name) example_definition =

Hey, May be it is just too deep night over here and I''m missing something though I got this failure on {{{response.should_not redirect_to}}}: ''QueuesController should allow authenticated user to access ''show'''' FAILED Matcher does not support should_not. See Spec::Matchers for more information about matchers. Also I''ve found this in

Dear all, sorry to bother you with potentially known issue -- we have noticed that if we select data frame rows by rownames, we get some results back if the match can be done unambiguously, though the match is not perfect (see example), e.g. x{"2",] will return a row if there is a unique row with name starting with "2" (but may be "2375745"!) is that a

Dear All, I would like to have an advice for designing an R library, and thought that R-devel may be the best place to ask given so many people who are highly expert in R are around. We are at an early stage of designing an R library, which is effectively an interface to a C++ library providing fast access to large matrices stored on HDD as binary files. The core of the C++ library is

Hello, all! Since switching to nouveau I'm encouranting random system hangs, e.g. video freeze and sounds still playing. And I was unable to switch to terminal. But problem is that I can't find anything relevant to this issue in logs, I tried to search in dmesg and Xorg logs. Please help to debug!

I''ve become very fond of Yurii Rashkovskii''s "aspects". For such a simple change they make it a LOT easier to navigate, read and verify specs. Are there any plans to include something like this in RSpec? Ashley

Hi. I''m upgrading a project from an 0.8.0 pre-release gem to 0.8.2. I''ve installed the 0.8.2 gem, and the rspec_on_rails 0.8.2 plugin: ruby script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_8_2/rspec When I try to run my specs though, I get the below error. It''s as if the spec_helper cannot find "spec/rails". I''ve noticed that

Hi everyone, Last year I found about GSoC and llvm bit to late to apply. I noticed that "Improve function attribute inference" project idea was not taken. Does anyone know if someone has worked on it in the meantime? If not, is someone interested in mentoring? Nuno Lopes or someone else? Thanks and regards, Stefan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Dear All, I need to convert all Rd help pages for my package to HTML format in order to serve these on our web-server. Ideally, I would like to do that as "all docs in single page" and also index page + one html page per Rd file. Looking through documentation the only clues I could find were * R CMD Rdconv --type=html FILE, which does not produce cross-links, does not

The "Revert [tag] message" is the default message generated by the 'git revert' command. Of course you would have to be using a git clone of LLVM instead of an SVN checkout in order to run 'git revert'. This command is the equivalent of 'svn merge –r' run from the top-level directory. I believe svn commands will operate only on the directories below the current

Hi, I am looking into Control-Flow Integrity for indirect function calls, implemented with jump tables. I want to step through the code that produces these jump tables in GDB. I have built clang and opt from source with debugging symbols. I believe this code lives in llvm/lib/Transforms/LowerTypeTests.cpp, but when I try to debug *opt* by running the command "run -lowertypetests cfi-icall.bc

The new "pending" example feature reminds me of a feature I''ve been bouncing around in my head, to aid in refactoring. Often, when I''m changing existing behaviour, I know that certain aspects of the old behaviour should change. Imagine changing the "it" method to perhaps "not" or "old" or "removed"... The behaviour would be to

Hi, I would like to give a quick update on what my current design and implementation go like. Basically, the `FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` is now modified to a generic version `FunctionToLoopUnitPassAdaptor`, which allows re-using the existing codes to implement `FunctionToLoopNestPassAdaptor`, with the help of additional metadata associated with `Loop` and `LoopNest`. Both

As I've spent really too long today investigating this, I want to document this in a public email, even though there's nothing really that interesting here. One thing you find from search for VDD 6.7 / VixDiskLib_QueryAllocatedBlocks issues with Google is that we must be one of the very few users out there. And the other thing is that it's quite broken. All testing was done using

Hi all, Phase 1 testing for the 3.1 release is officially over. We did find a few bugs, which we need your help in fixing: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12568 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12581 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12623 Please spend some time investigating these bugs. If you come up with a fix, great! I'll buy you a beer at the next LLVM dev meeting. :-)

Fangrui Song via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > One property of "Squash and merge" is that it will add intermediate > commits as bullet points (`* `). In many cases the merger does not spend > more time cleaning up the description so a commit may look like: > > ``` > RFC: treat small negative λ as 0 for sqrt(::Hermitian) (#35057) > >

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 09:37, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Apparently reviewable.io requests full permissions to control the > repository and its settings. > I noticed that, too. I guess that if it wants to keep a full history of all force-rebases it may need to create sub-branches for the pull requests, as well as to approve pull

Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> writes: > > Don't they give you the opportunity to amend the commit message, at least? I vaguely remember it's possible. > If you mean "amend" like in "git commit --amend", it's generally a bad idea to rewrite repository history that has already been published. If you mean "amend" the message in the Web

Good morning David, I won't accept your patches for now. It breaks lots of things in current environments, autoconf - msys, cmake - msys, cmake -mingw and cmake - msvs. - You should never forget other environments. (eg., MSYS and CMD.EXE) You should implement detecting MKS if you tweak MKS-specific stuff. - Bash should be assumed to be mature. I suppose MKS bash might be

On 01/15, Nicolai Hähnle via cfe-dev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:41 AM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote: > > We rarely approve some patches and not others in a series, and when we > > do, we ask people to create a new series without the approved patch, > > or split them, so that we can continue reviewing the series. > > This has simply not been