similar to: how can i get consumer-typeset exe in debug mode

Hi All, Could anyone please give your suggestions on how to generate/get Code Size of each test in LLVM TEST Suite. Thanks & Regards, Ramakota Reddy. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person,

Hi All, I want to use Optimization Level options in tailDuplicate() API from TailDuplicator.cpp file to restrict splice() function. With -Oz option this splice() API is duplicating the RET instruction in predecessor blocks. Could anyone please give your suggestions to get OPTLevel Options(which object will carry OptLevel Options in this stage?) in this level. Thanks & Regards, Ramakota

Hi All, How to get Code size and Performance numbers ? Could any one please give your suggestions. Thanks & Regards, Ramakota. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or

Hi All, I have made changes in clang side and llvm side for one ticket. How can I submit two patches(clang patch and llvm patch) for review ? Can I submit two patches in single revision or have to submit separate and tag them both? Could any one please give your suggestions. Thanks & Regards, Ramakota. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential

Hi All, I have commit some changes successfully and unable to push those changes using 'git push'. First time I am submitting my changes. When I tried with 'git push', giving "unable to access https://git.llvm.org/git/llvm.git/ :The requested URL returned error:403" Could any one please give your suggestion to resolve this issue. Thanks & Regards, Ramakota.

Hoping this is not off topic... I am in the process of writing some tutorials for my students for learning R, and naturally I'm using Sweave for this. So suddenly a question occurred to me: LaTeX has a recommended way of typesetting the TeX and LaTeX symbols, via the \TeX and \LaTeX commands. Is there a similar command for the R symbol, or in general are there any

On 14 May 2015 at 16:49, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset This was a fluke. The test passed later on all subsequent runs. > MultiSource/UnitTests/C++11/frame_layout/frame_layout This one is a new test, and I believe it wasn't there in 3.6.0, so it's ok to fail, since the patch hasn't been

Hello everyone, One of Google's summer interns, George Burgess IV, created an implementation of the CFL pointer-aliasing analysis algorithm, and this has now been added to LLVM trunk. Now we should determine whether it is worthwhile adding this to the default optimization pipeline. For ease of testing, I've added the command line option -use-cfl-aa which will cause the CFL analysis to be

Hi Kristof, Thanks for the measurements. > On May 24, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > >> >> On 23 May 2017, at 21:48, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Great! >> I thought I had to look at our pipeline at O0 to make sure optimized regalloc was

I am writting some functions that return an array of coefficients along with confidence intetervals for each coefficient. My intent is to eventually typeset the coefficients and intervals into a table (or tables) in a document. I would like to use existing tools such as the 'latex' function in the Hmisc package, the 'odfTable' function in odfWeave package, or 'HTML' in

Hi Jessica, This time I'm replying all.... On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Jessica Paquette <jpaquette at apple.com> wrote: > I would personally like a feature like that in FileCheck because it would > make it a lot easier to write MachineOutliner tests, and would make the > tests significantly smaller and easier to understand. > How do MachineOutliner tests accomplish

Here is a problem scenario. I want to enable a backend pass at -O2 or above. if (TM->getOptLevel() >= CodeGenOpt::Default) addPass(&xxxxx); This pass will be run at -O1 too since clang is creating the TargetMachine with CodeGenOpt::Default for -O1. --Sumanth G -----Original Message----- From: mehdi.amini at apple.com [mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017

Hi I am preparing a vignette, and I am finding that LaTeX ties (that is, the tilde symbol, "~", used to tell LaTeX not to make a newline in the output), are appearing as actual tildes. This is not desired behaviour for me. Thus the PDF includes things like this: ". . . taken directly from~Oakley (1999)....". [this typeset as "taken directly

Hi Jessica, The comparison to the inliner is an interesting one but we think it's important to note the difference in the use of heuristics. The inliner is juggling many different tasks at the same time, execution speed, code size, etc. which can cause the parameters to be very sensitive depending on the benchmark/platform/etc. The outliners heuristics are focused solely on the potential code

getOptLevel() gets the level from TargetMachine which is created by the Backendutil in clang with either "Default", "None" or "Aggressive". Threre is no correspondence for "Less". This boils down to , if I pass "-O1", the Target Machine is created with CodeGenOpt::Default. I am available on IRC @ sgundapa. -----Original Message----- From:

In lto+pgo some (5 out of 12 with usual suspect like perlbench and gcc among them using -flto -Wl,-mllvm,-use-cfl-aa -Wl,-mllvm,-use-cfl-aa-in-codegen) the CINT2006 benchmarks don’t compile. Has the implementation been tested with lto? If not, please stress the implementation more. Do we know reasons for gains? Where did you expect the biggest gains? Some of the losses will likely boil down to

Hi, I'm trying to do a Debug build for the 1st time and I keep getting this assertion: llvm-tblgen: CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp:64: llvm::EEVT::TypeSet::TypeSet(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::MVT::SimpleValueType>): Assertion `!VTList.empty() && "empty list?"' failed. I do not know what list this assertion is referring to. Does anyone know? I always did Release builds before

Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration >

Hi! There is a little problem in the security/isakmpd port. There are some gen*.sh scripts in it, which generate some C header (and src) files. These scripts are using awk, tr, etc - some generic UNIX tools. One of the tools has problems with some localisations, so these scripts generate incorrect C-code. Eg, I have Hungarian localisation set, so I have the following in my environ:

> On Jul 25, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Jessica Paquette <jpaquette at apple.com> wrote: > >> The two passes are pretty different in their approaches to congruency finding, so I don't think it helps to group them as though they were interchangeable "outliner technology". The two passes might be totally orthogonal. > > I think that based off how River described his