similar to: Moving docs?

Hi all, I'm currently in the process of updating the Kaleidoscope tutorials (first and foremost, the ORC/BuildingAJIT ones), and I've noticed a fair few 404s which are lingering within the current visible documentation. Some of these don't seem to have linked to existing pages for a while. I was wondering if there was a way to set up a check in the buildbot to ensure that

Hi folks, I'm working on migrating a JIT compiler from the old ORCv1 JIT APIs to the newer ORCv2 ones and am having some trouble getting the code from chapter 1 of the "Building a JIT" [1] tutorial working properly. I have previously walked through the "My First Langauge" [2] tutorial and that went smoothly using the provided JIT class, but using the one from the JIT

Patrick, how long does the crawl take? I suspect if we fixed internal documentation links so that they point to local copies of documentation when building locally it would be quite quick (no actual idea though). That in turn would probably make it feasible to add to the existing documentation build bots, I think. James On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 03:47, Neil Nelson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

Hi Praveen, Thanks for pointing that out :) That's my mistake. I might have been misidentifying the issue with the assert statement. With those fixes made function calls seem to all call the first function called in the REPL. For example: ready> def fib(n) if (n < 2) then n else fib(n - 1) + fib(n - 2); ... ready> fib(40); Evaluated to 102334155.000000 ready> fib(10); # This

Dear lots of people, The first comments on the 3.7 release expressed surprise that there were no changes to the X86 or ARM targets. There had of course been a lot of hard work and many changes, but none of it was mentioned in the release notes. Please help make the release notes more comprehensive this time. The notes are of course not as important as the actual code, but they do get read, and

HI Lang, Thanks a bunch for the reply. That worked great for on my end and is a pretty tiny change. Really appreciate all the work you've done on this new JIT stuff and putting together those great tutorials. Zeke On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:07 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Zeke, > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > You're right: the issue is

Hi, I’d like to propose adding a new example directory (llvm/examples/IRTransforms) as a new home for example code used by various tutorials. After talking to a few people at the Developers meeting, it became clear to me that it would be valuable to have the code examples for various tutorials in-tree to keep them from bit-rotting and make it very easy to build them. I’d suggest adding new IR

Hi Again, I'm a little confused regarding what is the exact Orc's functions I should use in order to save the functions code in a code cache so it could be later replaced with different versions of it and I appreciate your help. Just a reminder I want to dynamically recompile the program based on profile collected at the run-time. I would like to start executing the program from the

Hi all, I wrote a compiler front end which generates IR codes, but due to the logic, the IR codes have a lot of instructions like unnecessary br jump, basic block creation, load instructions and expression which can be simplified. now I want to use built in passes to optimize the generated code, but after I read the tutorial: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/MyFirstLanguageFrontend, I found that I

Hello, we use samba with ldap backend. All is working well. Now the user count should grow to about 3000 users in a mixed environment with PCs and terminal servers. So the most of the users typically have (more than one) sessions to different terminal servers. The smb version is (tragically) still v1 and a lot of the clients comes over a NAT gateway. To reduce the traffic to the remote ldap

Hello dear list, I have running a Samba 3 server (under SLES11) connected to an LDAP-Server and it is running well. But now, I like to migrate to Samba 4 and I've made a few tests before. The whole time I with Samba 3, I was surprised about the many ldap requests so that I thought about an additional local OpenLDAP proxy cache. But now with Samba 4 (with the same configuration like Samba 3,

Index: docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html =================================================================== --- docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (revision 105365) +++ docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (working copy) @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ def unary-(v) 0-v; -# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &gt;. +# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &lt;. def binary&gt; 10 (LHS RHS)

Applied in r106468, thanks! -Chris On Jun 2, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Adam Warner wrote: > Index: docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html > =================================================================== > --- docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (revision 105365) > +++ docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (working copy) > @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ > def unary-(v) > 0-v; > > -# Define &gt; with

The lists are working well for the people who are already invested in the community though - as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as well for new people. I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker). My fear

Hello, I run samba 3.6 and I need to track problems for dedicated users. So I thought, I load at the end via include special configurations for the user separately. My question is, how does the smbd configure itself. Does smbd 1) reads the config completely and then it set the parameters in the process or 2) does smbd reads and set each parameter instantly? So can I use the following example?

Hello everyone, *Short version:*I've set up an LLVM Discord server for real time chat (similar to IRC) and an LLVM Discourse server for forums (similar to email lists): https://discord.gg/xS7Z362 https://llvm.discourse.group/ Please join and use these new services. They are only partially set up and still very new, so don't hesitate to improve them and/or reach out to this thread with

FWIW I'm a fan of using open-source stuff for open-source projects. Discourse looks open source, but Discord doesn't as far as I can tell (?). On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:15 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I sent the message quoted below to llvm-dev@ just now, but it applies to > the whole community so sending an FYI

Hello, I'm trying to configure a CIFS-Proxy. My configuration is: [global] workgroup = MYDOM server role = member server realm = MYDOM.NET netbios name = FS01 server services = +smb +s3fs dcerpc endpoint servers = +winreg +srvsvc [test] ntvfs handler = cifs cifs:server = 192.168.1.10 cifs:share = projects$ but in

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication channels > such > as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here) > for > informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is

This is an email to all New York based Asterisk users. For some time it's been bugging me that we don't have a local contact point/user community. If you are involved in Asterisk and in NY/NJ shoot me an email, I'm going to try and revitalize either meetup.com or some other shared environment for Asterisk users in NY. Shoot me an email and once I get an idea of how many