similar to: call an existing IPO pass

Hi, I'm trying to use the function getAnalysis. This is the code I'm using : void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); AU.setPreservesAll(); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(); } I get following error when I try to run my pass : opt:

Hello, I was trying to get the loop info in a module pass to be able to iterate over the loops int the module itself. Since my pass requires to make module level changes including adding new types to module hence a looppass cannot be used here. I am getting the following error on running opt. opt: /root/llvm-2.4/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:199: AnalysisType&

Hi, you need something like this in your pass: void YourPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); } because you need to specify which analysis you are using. Tobi

On 08/12/2010 09:41 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > Dear guys, > > I am having problems to obtain good information from the LoopInfo. > I am always getting a trip count of 0, even though I am clearly passing > a loop with a constant bound. I am using this pass below: Hi, I would propose to first check if the trip count is calculated correctly. I would do this with opt

Hi, Migrating from 3.5 to 3.9. There is a module pass that uses alias analysis started breaking at runtime: llvm/lnx64/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:236: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(llvm::AnalysisID) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::AAResultsWrapperPass; llvm::AnalysisID = const void*]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was

But this is already present in my pass. And I am not able to understand the cause for the error: opt: /home/ambika/llvm_3/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:203: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::DominatorTree]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not "

nitisha warkari wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use the function getAnalysis. This is the code I'm using : > > void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); > AU.setPreservesAll(); > } > > virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { > LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(); > >

Hi, I had a question about this as well. The documentation about writing a pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass within a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that way, I still get the same error: opt: /x/jeffhao/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:232: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*,

ambika wrote: > But this is already present in my pass. > And I am not able to understand the cause for the error: > Can you send a copy of your getAnalysisUsage() method for your pass? There are some funny errors that can occur when you do things that the PassManager cannot handle. For example, if you're requiring a transform pass, that can cause strange assertions from the

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Tobias Grosser <grosser at fim.uni-passau.de>wrote: > On 08/12/2010 09:41 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > >> Dear guys, >> >> I am having problems to obtain good information from the LoopInfo. >> I am always getting a trip count of 0, even though I am clearly passing >> a loop with a constant bound. I am using

Hey all, We have been working on a pass that uses another pass to count loads and stores prior to performing its own instrumentation. The second pass adds the first as required via the usual getAnalysisUsage function. On one machine, it has been tested and proven to function correctly. On another machine, whenever the second pass is run, it consistently fails the assertion: opt:

Dear All, The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following assertion: test: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:226: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not "

ambika wrote: > Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using, > > void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.setPreservesAll(); > AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); > } > > and then I use it as, > > > bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module &M) { > > DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); > ...... >

I’ve been debugging SAFECode source code files, and line 170 in ArrayBoundCheckLocal.cpp has been causing the following compilation error: In file included from /Users/peterfinn/Desktop/llvm_trunk_2/projects/safecode/lib/ArrayBoundChecks/ArrayBoundCheckLocal.cpp:18: In file included from

I have a transformation where I'd like to use both DominatorTree (for ExtractCodeRegion), and DemoteRegisterToMemory (i.e., reg2mem). The transformation is phased, so all occurrences of getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(Function) happen before any occurrence of getAnalysisID<FunctionPass>(&DemoteRegisterToMemoryID, Function). If I register these two passes with DominatorTree first, I

Hello, I have created a ModulePass, that now needs LoopInfo information. The ModulePass registration is taken from [1]. I use clang to directly invoke it (This is also a hard requirement, because I need the fancy output of clang warnings/remarks). The problem is, that the dependency to the LoopInfoWrapperPass does not seem to work. The error is: --- snip --- clang-4.0:

Dear all, Hi! I encounter an interesting assertion failure when implementing my Pass, which is defined with the member functions shown below: ======================My Pass====================================== bool MYPass::runOnModule(Module &M) { for (auto &F : M) { SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>(F).getSE(); ......

Here is getAnalysisUsage() i am using, void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.setPreservesAll(); AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>(); } and then I use it as, bool ptrTest::runOnModule(Module &M) { DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); ...... } John Criswell wrote: > ambika wrote: >> But this is already present in

On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff Yeong-Peng Hao wrote: > > Hi, > > I had a question about this as well. The documentation about > writing a > pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass > within > a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that > way, I > still get the same error: > > opt:

Hi:    I want to do some optimization on MachineLoop. So I want to get MachineLoopInfo from MachineFunction. I reference MachineLICM.cpp. So I try to write a pass in Target/mytarget directory. I find there is Error. llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:198: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::MachineLoopInfo]: Assertion