similar to: How to generate .bc file using configure && make on Mac OS X?

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches similar to: "How to generate .bc file using configure && make on Mac OS X?"

2019 Jan 28
2
How to generate .bc file using configure && make on Mac OS X?
> On macOS you just omit the '-fuse-ld=gold' and it will work out of the box. > > ./configure CC=clang RANLIB=llvm-ranlib CFLAGS=-flto > > LDFLAGS=-Wl\,-plugin-opt=save-temps\ -flto\ -fuse-ld=gold > > make No. It doesn't work on Mac OS by just omitting '-fuse-ld=gold'. $ ../../../extract/bash-5.0/configure CC=clang CXX=clang++ RANLIB=llvm-ranlib
2019 Feb 18
4
LLVM version shipped by Mac
Apple shows the following LLVM version. But the last LLVM version is just 9. I don't know where 10 comes from. Does Apple use a different version number system? Thanks. $ /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/clang --version Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.10.44.4) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin17.7.0 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin --
2018 Sep 20
3
A different error in sample()
Good day, The use of "rounding" also doesn't make sense. If The number is halfway between two integers, it is rounded to the nearest even integer. > round(2.5) [1] 2 -------------------------------------- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia
2014 Mar 11
0
Questions on using bridge for KVM on ubuntu 13.10
Hi, I have being try to connect a virtual machine to the outside through a bridge on the host. The following shows that I have a bridge. And I'm able to start a guest. pengy@rigel:~$ brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.c81f66e29049 no em4 br1 8000.c81f66e29045 no bond0 virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
2019 Jan 19
2
What does "preds" mean in a .ll file?
Hi, I see things like this. What does it mean? Is it documented somewhere? Thanks. ; preds = %for.body https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html ; <label>:91: ; preds = %88 %92 = load i8**, i8*** @glob_complete_word.matches, align 8, !dbg !99798 %93 = load i32, i32* @glob_complete_word.ind, align 4, !dbg !99799 %94 = sext i32 %93 to i64, !dbg !99798
2015 Jan 21
1
Samba4 Sharing Issue
Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > On 13/01/15 11:48, srikanth <at> icat.ac.in wrote: > > Dear Samba Team, > > First of all Thank you for Implementing samba4 version > > with RSAT it was very useful in our environment.we have > > configured samba4 with RSAT in our college it was working > > for the
2015 Jan 13
2
Samba4 Sharing Issue
Dear Samba Team, First of all Thank you for Implementing samba4 version with RSAT it was very useful in our environment.we have configured samba4 with RSAT in our college it was working for the past 5 to 6 weeks and then later we are facing the problem in accessing sharing folder i am getting error "security id structure is invalid" is there any solution for this
2019 Jan 05
1
unsorted - suggestion for performance improvement and ALTREP support for POSIXct
I believe the performance of isUnsorted() in sort.c could be improved by calling REAL() once (outside of the for loop), rather than calling it twice inside the loop. As an aside, it is implemented in the faster way in doSort() (sort.c line 401). The example below shows the performance improvement for a vectors of double of moving REAL() outside the for loop. # example as implemented in
2018 Sep 20
0
A different error in sample()
Besides wording of the documentation re truncating vs rounding, there is something peculiar going on with the fractional part of n: > table(sample.int(2.5, 1e6, replace = TRUE)) 1 2 3 399051 401035 199914 > table(sample.int(3, 1e6, replace = TRUE)) 1 2 3 332956 332561 334483 > table(sample.int(2.01, 1e6, replace = TRUE)) 1 2 3
2018 Sep 20
2
A different error in sample()
FWIW, I suspect this is related to the function R_unif_index that was introduced in src/main/RNG.c around revision 72356, or the way this function is used in do_sample in src/main/random.c. 20.9.18 08:19, Wolfgang Huber scripsit: > Besides wording of the documentation re truncating vs rounding, there is > something peculiar going on with the fractional part of n: > > >