similar to: [GSOC 2019] project ideas from 2018

On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 13:01, Stefan Stipanovic <stefomeister at gmail.com> wrote: > Is the channel now purposefully invite-only? If so, how is one supposed to join? It's not. More people were added as moderators to curb the problem instead. Are you having trouble joining the channel?

Hi all, A while back we started annotating intrinsics with new attributes ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D65377) After some discussion it was decided it would be good to have an `opt-out` attribute list for intrinsics. Some attributes that can be added to the list could be: nosync, nofree, nounwind, willreturn For now, there are 2 approaches: 1. Filtering opt-out attributes in tablegen source (

There is already 10 PRs sent to GitHub repo. But they all are useless, in every PR people are being informed that they should send patches to http://reviews.llvm.org/

At 8/16/2020 10:39 AM, Stefan Stipanovic wrote: >Hi Paul, > >I've read "LLVM Code-Review Policies and Practices," but I remain unsure of a couple of things. Do I always wait for an actual "LGTM", or can people approve the patch for submission in other ways? > >The patch is accepted through Phabricator with or without a message (the message is usually LGTM or

Is the channel now purposefully invite-only? If so, how is one supposed to join? Thanks, Stefan On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:23 PM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:03, Ryan Houdek <sonicadvance1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll comment from the perspective of someone that is in the Mesa, > #dri-devel, #radeon

I've read "LLVM Code-Review Policies and Practices," but I remain unsure of a couple of things. Do I always wait for an actual "LGTM", or can people approve the patch for submission in other ways? What happens when a patch is approved but then there are additional review comments? Should the patch be submitted as is, then a follow-up patch submitted, or should the

та или другая дама будет от Вас в экстазе http://goo.gl/8HZBDX _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying

???? ????? ??????. ????? ? ????? ?? ??? ????. ? ??????, ??? ?? ?? ?????????????. ? ??????????????? ????????? CEO-???????????? ?????? ? ????????? ????????. ? ????? ??????? ??? ???? ?? ??????? ??????? ????????? ??????. ??? ????????? ?????????????? ?????? ??????????? ?? ????, ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????????. ? ??????????? ?? ???????? ???? SEO-??????????? ????? ?????? ?? 1 ?? 10 ???????. ? ????

????????????. ???? ????? ????????, ? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????. ???? ??????? ?? ??????????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????????????? ?????????? ???????? ????????. ??? ??????????? ????? ? ????????? ??????, ??? ?????????? ????? ?????, ?????????? ?????? ? ???? ????? ??????, ??????? ????-???? ? ?????????, ???????? ?????? ? ????? ?????? ??????. ????? ???? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ?????. ?

???????? ?????? ? ????? ??????????? ?????? - ?????????. ?????????? ?????????? - ??????? ????????????? ?????? ????????????? ??????????? ? ??? ? ?????? ??????? ? ?????. http://www.?????-?-?????????.?? ?????? ?? ??????????.

Hi Fahad, > > Improve dynamic memory related capabilities of Attributor. For example > Improve HeapToStackConversions. Maybe such deductions can help safety > (dis)provers. For example, can we improve the use-after-free bug detection > using some attributes? > Stefan should know more about H2S. Regarding the use-after-free, I don't > think there's currently any plans

Hi Farad, > I tried to do this for the NoUnwind attribute Hmm, I don't have experience with this attribute but it seems like a good starting point since it doesn't do much. First of all, be sure that you run with: opt -passes=attributor -attributor-disable=false This uses the new pass manager which is another discussion. Now, to the point: If you open nounwind.ll, it has a bunch of

It's time again to apply to be a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code. This means we need to refresh the list of suggested projects at: http://syslinux.zytor.com/wiki/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code_Ideas I'm running even more ragged than usual, so any help in this would be appreciated. I'd also like to know who'd be willing to mentor this year. -hpa -- H. Peter

Добрый день коллеги. Подскажите, пожалуйста, на все ли выполняемые строительные работы у Вас есть Свидетельство о Допуске? Если нет, то мы поможем получить допуски в СРО строителей, проектировщиков, изыскателей. Допуски СРО с рассрочкой платежа - дешево от 45000 руб., за 3 дня! Работаем по всей РОССИИ! В наличии имеются готовые фирмы с допусками СРО, всегда большой выбор! Оставьте заявку, если Вас

Здравствуйте! Нашла Ваш контакт в интернете, сообщите пожалуйста - на все ли реализуемые продукты у Вас есть сертификаты? И все ли они действующие? Если на какие либо продукты Вам потребуется сертификат - наш центр сертификации может сделать Вам его в рекордно короткие сроки. Если предложение интересно - пожалуйста напишите на какие виды товаров требуются изготовить сертификат - я сообщу

Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, на все ли выполняемые строительные работы у Вас есть Свидетельство о Допуске? Если нет, то мы поможем получить допуски в СРО строителей, проектировщиков, изыскателей. Допуски СРО с рассрочкой платежа - дешево от 45000 руб., за 3 дня! Работаем по всей РОССИИ! В наличии имеются готовые фирмы с допусками СРО, всегда большой выбор! Оставьте заявку, если Вас

Hello all, My name is Stefan and I'm a 3rd year undergraduate student from Serbia. This year was the first (and probably last) time i got to learn about compilers and compiler development and I really liked it. As it sparked my interest, I started researching and found about llvm and GSoC in particular. Since I found out about GSoC a bit to late and had no prior experience with llvm, I

tis 2010-03-23 klockan 09:23 -0700 skrev Chris Lattner: > > Does all this count as opening LLVM to a new community? > > Yes, particularly if the Plan 9 folks are interested in incorporating the result into their distribution. There were some efforts to start a LLVM-based toolchain for Plan 9 during GSoC'09 (did not result in a project), and there are ongoing discussions to try it

Hi, Nick > There are two administrative questions: which organization should mentor > these projects and in which source tree should the result be included? > There will be substantial amount of code that will be specific for Plan > 9/Inferno, and probably it will not be welcome in LLVM tree. On the > other hand, a student may require mentoring by people from both > projects.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 2:47 AM, Nick Frolov wrote: > mån 2010-03-22 klockan 17:23 -0700 skrev Chris Lattner: > >> We generally prefer for GSoC projects that are useful to a broad range >> of people or that opens llvm to a new community. > > My idea was to propose bringing LLVM to Inferno OS (the complement > project of Plan 9 from Bell Labs). This OS has a virtual