similar to: [RFC] Adding support for dynamic entries in yaml2obj

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[RFC] Adding support for dynamic entries in yaml2obj"

2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---
2015 Sep 29
10
[PATCH 0/2] Fixes for gcc 5
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> TL;DR: The section aligment in linker scripts messed-up the memory mapping needed for the compression / decompression to work. The bug with gcc 5 is not trivial, I'll do my best to explain it here. Basically, there are two memory mappings of the code. One in "virtual memory", and one in "load memory". The one in
2015 Oct 05
7
[PATCH 0/4] Improve linker scripts
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> These patches basically remove unused linker scripts and port a change that was made to an unused script. Those are to be applied on top of the gcc 5 bug fixes as they would conflict otherwise. Sylvain Gault (4): diag/mbr: fix dependency to linker script Remove unused linker scripts core: Make symbols defined in linker script HIDDEN
2006 Jul 24
1
klibc parisc64
I hacked out a rough first implementation of parisc64 for klibc last month, and only just got around to testing it now. The good news, it compiled fine on the first shot. The bad news, it failed to link usr/klibc/libc.so, and I'm not clueful enough to know why. hppa64-linux-gnu-ld -Ttext 0x40001000 -o usr/klibc/libc.so --start-group [...] usr/klibc/socketcalls/recvmsg.o
2019 Feb 27
14
RFC: Linker feature for automatically partitioning a program into multiple binaries
Hi folks, I'd like to propose adding a feature to ELF lld for automatically partitioning a program into multiple binaries. (This will also involve adding a feature to clang, so I've cc'd cfe-dev as well.) == Problem statement == Embedded devices such as cell phones, especially lower end devices, are typically highly resource constrained. Users of cell phone applications must pay a
2017 Nov 01
2
elf2yaml document structure, for dynamic symbols
I'm adding support for elf dynamic symbols in yaml2obj/obj2yaml. I'm seeking opinions about how to model dynamic symbols (and symbols in general) in the yaml structure. Currently, symbols in elf are represented by a top level `Symbols` key, within which symbols are grouped by binding type (Global, Weak, Local). The simplest thing to do would be to mirror this structure to a DynamicSymbols
2017 Nov 01
2
elf2yaml document structure, for dynamic symbols
> I wonder why you want to add the new feature to yaml2obj. Maybe, explaining your motivation would help others understand your problem. Thanks for the cue! I am using yaml2obj to generate stub dynamic libraries. On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion on this. yaml2obj was there when I joined to > the project,
2019 Mar 02
2
RFC: Linker feature for automatically partitioning a program into multiple binaries
I covered the example of the operating system API in the original proposal, but yes, you might also be able to use this for kernel modules. The justification isn't as great for them since kernels typically require linker scripts, and I'm not planning to make this compatible with linker scripts. But if you did manage to write a kernel that didn't need a linker script, this seems like it
2014 May 12
12
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4.2 Release Plan - Testers Needed
Hi, I would like to begin the 3.4.2 release process for LLVM. There have been two issues identified in 3.4.1, which there is interest in having fixed in a 3.4.x release: 1. Build failure with gcc 4.9 (This is not a regression, 3.4 also fails to build with gcc 4.9). 2. Accidental change of libLLVM's DT_SONAME from libLLVM-3.4 libLLVM-3.4.1.so I will also accept any other bug-fixes that
2018 Mar 02
5
[PATCH 0/5] Various MIPS fixes
Hi, I noticed that klibc started crashing on 64-bit MIPS and in my quest to fix the bug I got a bit carried away and fixed a few other things as well. Here are various miscellaneous MIPS patches, although the first patch is the important one. Thanks, James *** BLURB HERE *** James Cowgill (5): mips64: compile with -mno-abicalls mips: use -Ttext-segment when linking shared library
2019 Aug 29
2
[RFC] Moving RELRO segment
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:10 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: > Hello Vic, > > To make sure I understand the proposal correctly, do you propose: > > Old: R RX RW(RELRO) RW > New: R(R+RELRO) RX RW; R includes the traditional R part and the > RELRO part > Runtime (before relocation resolving): RW RX RW > Runtime (after relocation resolving): R RX
2014 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] gmail marking llvm emails as spam? Re:
i Don't know if others have raised this issue, but I'm seeing *a lot* of llvm-dev emails and cfe emails landing in my spam folder in gmail. Are other people having this problem? On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to begin the 3.4.2 release process for LLVM. There have > been two issues identified in
2019 Sep 03
2
[RFC] Moving RELRO segment
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:54 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: > > > Old: R RX RW(RELRO) RW > > > New: R(R+RELRO) RX RW; R includes the traditional R part and the > > > RELRO part > > > Runtime (before relocation resolving): RW RX RW > > > Runtime (after relocation resolving): R RX RW > > > > > I actually see two
2015 Sep 29
0
[PATCH 2/2] bios: Don't try to guess the sections alignment
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> For the compression / decompression to succeed, the sections layout must be the same between the virtual memory and load memory. The section alignment was kept in sync by introducing aligment that should be greater or equal to the actual section alignment. This patch compute the load memory addresses of the sections so that the layout is the
2016 Feb 08
3
[LLD] Is there any reason to add _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ to .dynsym?
When LLD builds a shared library for x86_64 it puts _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ to the both .symtab and .dynsym and defines it as a GLOBAL symbol. If later this shared library participates in executable file linking and GNU BFD linked is used for that, this linker shows an error: /usr/bin/ld: a.out: hidden symbol `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o is referenced by DSO Gold
2014 Mar 11
4
[PATCH] add mips64 support
From: Dejan Latinovic <Dejan.Latinovic at imgtec.com> --- usr/include/arch/mips64/klibc/archconfig.h | 3 + usr/include/arch/mips64/klibc/archsetjmp.h | 39 ++++++ usr/include/arch/mips64/machine/asm.h | 76 ++++++++++ usr/include/fcntl.h | 2 +- usr/include/sys/md.h | 1 + usr/include/sys/resource.h | 4 +-
2019 Nov 15
2
Commit history duplicated, seeing weird diffusion activity (Was: [Diffusion] rG67c416dc9a5a: [DebugInfo] Allow spill slots in call site parameter descriptions)
I just got a Diffusion notification about a change of mine being reverted by Fangrui, but I'm not sure that's actually what happened and am confused and concerned. My commit was "[DebugInfo] Allow spill slots in call site parameter descriptions", and it appears in the history under two hashes: 1ee84e and 67c416. The first commit contains the actual change. The second touches
2020 Feb 21
2
Re: alternatives for hooking dlopen() without LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_AUDIT?
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:00:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> I think what confuses me is that keep talking about a single binary, but > >> clearly there is this separate vddk DSO, and there is talk of plugins. > >> So it seems to me that multiple files are