similar to: UTF-8 conversion speed

On 02/10/18 22:58, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev wrote: > On 10/2/2018 2:27 PM, via llvm-dev wrote: >> At CPPcon last week, I saw a talk by Bob Steagall called >> "Fast Conversion From UTF-8 with C++, DFAs, and SSE Intrinsics." >> Part of this talk included data from a half-dozen or so conversion >> libraries... one of which was labeled "LLVM". >>

I am trying a "netstat | grep netbios" and receive nothing back. I tried "netstat | grep 139" and nothing as well. I have the correct netbios ports in /etc/services. Does anyone know to make this show up with a netstat or have those services running? I believe this may be my problem with the mapping of samba shares to the client. Any help would be appreciated, Dan

The videos for the 2015 LLVM Developers’ Meeting may be found on our YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv2_41bSAa5Y_8BacJUZfjQ <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv2_41bSAa5Y_8BacJUZfjQ>). Here is the link to the playlist: https://youtu.be/5W7NkofUtAw?list=PL_R5A0lGi1AA4Lv2bBFSwhgDaHvvpVU21 <https://youtu.be/5W7NkofUtAw?list=PL_R5A0lGi1AA4Lv2bBFSwhgDaHvvpVU21> Subscribe

All, The Windows 2000 client is on my side of the firewall (the error message is: "remote computer is not available"), the Windows XP client is on the other side of the firewall, (the error message is: "The specified network name is no longer available"). I am able to ping both the IP address and server name of the CIFS/Samba server. I cannot perform the mapping, via Map

All, I would like to apply a set of rules to each row of the sample data set below. The rule sets are the guidelines for determining an individual's date for retirement eligibility. The rules are found in this document, http://www.opm.gov/feddata/RetirementPaperFinal_v4.pdf. I am only interested in the top two categories for retirement eligibility, the CSRS and FERS plans. The data set has

This email is written on the premise that LLVM will be involved in GSOC again this year. I noted that the wiki's open projects page [0] has several possible projects, that seem suitable for a summer of code project. I am writing this email to this list with the hope of getting some feedback on specifics for a GSOC application, and also wondering if any potential mentors are interested in

Moving to the LLVM Dev list & cc'ing Lang. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Joshua Gerrard via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I’m developing an application that uses Orc JIT for C++, which works > swimmingly on Mac OS X. However, the Windows version has been a battle and > a half, and it’s now at the point where I need some assistance

Greetings everyone, I am Abhay Raj Singh, a 2nd-year student at NIT Hamirpur, Bharat(India). I am very interested in the project titled "Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations" I would like to apologize for contacting so late I had midterm examination, finished recently. I have taken a course on OpenMP from YouTube which was supported by Intel I have ~4-5 years of

Hi, I’m working on setting up ThinLTO+CFI for a C application which uses a lot of function pointers. While functionally it appears stable, it’s performance is significantly degraded, to the tune of double digit percentage points compared to regular LTO+CFI. Looking into possible causes I see that under ThinLTO+CFI iCall type checks almost always generate jump table entries for indirect calls,

Hi Dmitry, Sorry for the late reply. For CFI specific code generation, pcc is a better person to answer. But on the issue of global variables being optimized, that hasn't happened yet. That would be great if you wanted to pick that up! In your original email example, it seems like the file static i=53 could be constant propagated since there are no other defs, and the code in get_fptr

Hi Jason ! Hmmm, this is good and bad news: Good: ruby hooks means I could use a single pass to parse textile customizations in zena instead of running two parsers: nice. Bad: I have just switched to ragel for QueryBuilder to parse pseudo sql and I fear your shortcomings (if that''s an english phrase). Could you describe more precisely what you are missing with ragel ? I''m

Yes, I would hate for some library implementer to either interpret the standard differently or simply not consider the issue of recursive parallelism at all and end up with an implementation that doesn't support it (not that unlikely considering it went 1.5 years through committee as you said and the topic never came up). On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:25 AM Bryce Lelbach <balelbach at

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:49 PM, <dmitry.mikulin at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Teresa, > > Thanks for the info! > This example is my attempt to reduce FreeBSD kernel to something more > manageable :) > > I will take a look at why globals are not being imported in this case. > What’s the best tool to look into ThinLTO objects and their summaries? Most > dumping tools

Thanks for the link! There’s some code there that looks extremely relevant to say the least. > On 1 Oct 2015, at 19:00, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe looking at their code might help: > > https://github.com/dotnet/llilc/blob/dd12743f9cdb5418f1c39b2cd756da1e8396a922/lib/Jit/LLILCJit.cpp#L299 > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:45 AM, David

Hi Teresa, Thanks for the info! This example is my attempt to reduce FreeBSD kernel to something more manageable :) I will take a look at why globals are not being imported in this case. What’s the best tool to look into ThinLTO objects and their summaries? Most dumping tools don’t seem to like ThinLTO bitcode files… Hopefully Peter can chime in regarding CFI related issues. Thanks. Dmitry.

Inspired by Jason Turner's talk at CppCon 2016: Jason Turner “Rich Code for Tiny Computers: A Simple Commodore 64 Game in C++17” I got interested in writing a Zilog Z80 backend for LLVM. Jason actually did no such thing, but instead wrote a x86-to-6502 translator (reassembler he calls it) https://github.com/lefticus/x86-to-6502 So I'm now trying to bootstrap this project. Goal: - be

I watched Teresa’s talk on ThinLTO from last year’s CppCon, and it sounded like adding global variable information to the summaries was in the works, or at least in planning. Can someone (Teresa?) please share the current status? If it’s part of future plans, are there any specific proposals that can be picked up and worked on? Thanks! > On Apr 9, 2018, at 6:51 PM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev

Even without a concrete use case, I agree that it's absolutely imperative for the standard to require this of a conforming implementation. It's going to be the source of so many problems otherwise On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:14 AM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 05/12/2017 11:00 AM, Scott Smith wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Bryce Lelbach

On 2 Nov 2015, at 16:23, Marshall Clow via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I find it amusing that you think that there's a "correct behavior" when the standard specifies that an operation should throw an exception and you have disabled exceptions. This is possibly something that the standards committee should address. There are lots of situations where

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Bryce Lelbach <balelbach at lbl.gov> wrote: > * I am concerned that nested parallel algorithms will prove to be a > big implementation burden for GPU and accelerator architectures. > Can't they fall back on serial execution? I thought the executor is a hint, not a requirement (certainly the standard doesn't say it has to execute on