similar to: RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool

> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > (my vote, somewhat biased - is that I'd love to see more investment in Bloaty (to keep all these sort of size analysis tools and tricks in one place), but sort of accept folks are probably going to keep building more infrastructure for this sort of thing in LLVM directly) I get where that comes

> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:25 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:24 PM JF Bastien <jfbastien at apple.com <mailto:jfbastien at apple.com>> wrote: >> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> (my vote, somewhat biased - is that

Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get this error on multiple systems : (Compiling with gcc): llvm[4]: Compiling cc1_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Compiling cc1as_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Compiling driver.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang

On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get > this error on multiple systems : Linking, not compiling, but still. I am getting a similar error when building this morning. > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "clang::Sema::checkPseudoObjectRValue(clang::Expr*)", referenced

On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: > >        http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ > > for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your

Good day, LLVMers! We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release. Please keep

I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a device.... :)

Hi All, We have populated info in the Clang Sema i.e class Sema (include/clang/Sema/Sema.h) and like to propagate the same to Clang Codegen . Currently we are propagating through ASTContext ,where we have duplicating fields info and operation in the Sema and ASTContext . Any better way of doing the same ? Thank you ~Umesh

Hi, all. I want to give programmer ability to tell LLVM that certain region of code is expected to get specialized optimization. So, I'm trying to make custom pragma to mark certain region of code and pass this information to LLVM, in the similar way that '#pragma clang loop unroll_count(N)' works. By tracking the framework of loop unroll pragma, I found out it works in the way below.

Abstract from http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy > > host=s: The destination server's *IP address*. This field is required. > Note that currently it's required to use an IP address since no DNS > resolving is done. > Hello Timo, Here goes one more item for the v2.0 wishlist: Will it become possible to do dovecot imap proxying based on a

Yes. I checked that file, but I wasn't sure whether that is right one to look at. What is *.td extension btw? When I google it, it says this is for Windows Debug Simulator. Why clang use this extension, which is limited to Windows environment? On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > That file is generated by the clang-tblgen tool: > >

> Yes. I checked that file, but I wasn't sure whether that is right one to look at. It seems promising. I imagine you'd want something like the LoopHint attr. > What is *.td extension btw? The llvm project uses that extension to identify TableGen inputs (http://llvm.org/docs/TableGen/). vedant > On Oct 25, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Sunghyun Park <sunggg at umich.edu> wrote:

Hi all, As of r232885 I've removed the argument-less TargetMachine::getSubtarget and TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl. For the targets that aren't completely independent of this I've gone ahead and left a non-virtual version of the function in the target specific TargetMachine. What this means in practice is that those targets can only use a bare getSubtarget call in their target

Hi, I'm trying to implement an overloading behavior to some of our builtin functions, and came across the following comment in SemaExpr.cpp // Check for overloaded calls. This can happen even in C due to extensions. If (Fn->getType() == Context.OverloadTy) { .... I was wondering which C extensions is this referring to? Thanks Ali -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

thanks Richard, The experiment was indeed done with nested VM enabled. I am not sure about the internals, but i thought once overlay is setup the 2 main processes are sshd and qemu-img convert (reading data from sshd and doing the conversion) I don't see any of the qemu process running. Initial overlay setup was pretty quick and rest of the time was spent in qemu-img convert operation Suresh

Hi, while experimenting with llvmlinux on Debian/testing AMD64 I wanted to run some x86-64 ASM tests. I fell over [1] and wanted to run it. So, I cloned clang from Git... $ git clone https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang.git I looked through some docs where I have seen I need "llvm-lit" or "lit.py". The Debian package llvm-7-tools from <apt.llvm.org> does ship

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > We would like to make a proposal to support OpenMP in CLANG. The goal of > > this effort is to provide support for syntax > > > > analysis (parsing), semantic

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 13, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> >> wrote: >> > I actually have a particular allergy to member variable names and >> function names having

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Amara Emerson <aemerson at apple.com> wrote: > On 7 May 2018, at 11:01, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > The simplest way to run a clang test case that I know of is to clone both > llvm and clang repos, run all the

> On 7 May 2018, at 11:01, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com <mailto:brian.cain at gmail.com>> wrote: >> The simplest way to run a clang test case that I know of is to clone both >> llvm and clang repos, run all the tests, then run an individual test. >>