similar to: llvm and python bindings under windows

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "llvm and python bindings under windows"

2017 Jun 21
2
question about llvmlite
​Hi all, I am using llvmlite for pyvex and I want the output of my code (which is written based on llvmlite) to be like pyvex. In pyvex, (https://github.com/angr/pyvex). Considering pyvex, I tried to implement the following statements in pyvex to llvmlite: for stmt in irsb.statements: if isinstance(stmt, pyvex.IRStmt.Store): print "ST%s(%s) = %s" % (self.endness[-2:].lower(),
2017 Aug 17
0
PAM Clustering
Sorry, I never use pam. In the help, you can see that pam require a dataframe OR a dissimilarity matrix. If diss=FALSE then "euclidean" was use.So, I interpret that a matrix of dissimilarity is generated automatically. Problems may be in your data. Indeed pam(ruspini, 4)$diss write a dissimilaty matrix while pam(MYdata,10)$diss wite NULL 2017-08-17 16:03 GMT+02:00 Sema Atasever
2017 Aug 17
2
PAM Clustering
Dear Germano, Thank you for your fast reply, In the above code, *MYData *is the actual data set. Do not we need to convert *MYData to *the dissimilarity matrix using *pam(as.dist(**MYData**), k = 10, diss = TRUE*)* code line?* *Regards.* On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Germano Rossi <germano.rossi at gmail.com> wrote: > try this > > MYdata <-
2017 Jan 12
2
llvmcpy: yet another Python binding for LLVM
Hi, I wrote yet another [1,2] Python binding for LLVM! I'm doing this because llvmlite has some serious limitations: 1) it cannot parse an existing IR, only create new modules [3], 2) it keeps its own representation of the IR (which is less memory efficient than the LLVM one), and 3) each llvmlite version supports a single LLVM version. Considering that my need is to load modules of hundreds
2015 Sep 30
7
[Bug 92192] New: nouveau does not detect monitor native resolution
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92192 Bug ID: 92192 Summary: nouveau does not detect monitor native resolution Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at
2014 Oct 07
6
[Bug 84741] New: (EE) [drm] KMS not enabled
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84741 Bug ID: 84741 Summary: (EE) [drm] KMS not enabled Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at
2018 Jan 01
5
Is there a python binding, or any other script binding, that has access to individual instructions?
There is llvmlite http://llvmlite.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ , but it doesn't seem to support reading individual instructions, based on these docs. I was thinking to make a simple code analysis tool to, for example, find all system calls that have unchecked return codes, but I can't find a binding for any scripting language. And I am averse to writing this in C++. Thanks, Yuri
2016 Jan 19
2
[RFC] A proposal for byval in a world with opaque pointers
2016-01-20 1:11 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:47:56 +0200 > "Eddy B. via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > I would love to know your thoughts on this, and more specifically: > > Which of the 3 (byval(T), byval(N) and byval + dereferenceable + align) > > do you
2017 Aug 17
0
PAM Clustering
try this MYdata <- read.csv2("data.txt",dec='.') library(cluster) cluster.pam = pam(MYdata,10) table(cluster.pam$clustering) filenameclu = paste("clusters", ".txt") write.table(cluster.pam$clustering, file=filenameclu,sep=",") 2017-08-17 10:28 GMT+02:00 Sema Atasever <s.atasever at gmail.com>: > Dear Authorized Sir / Madam, > >
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Moving towards a singular pointer type
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan <at> ochtman.nl> writes: > > > > As far as I understand, this change is wanted because the LLVM > > infrastructure derives no value from knowing the types, and there's a > > cost in terms of code spent to support all of it.
2017 Jun 16
4
Execution
​Hello all, I have written a code in llvmlite. Using command numba --dump-llvm example.py > example.ll I can have .ll file. However, using lli example.ll, I am stopped with error: 'main' function not found in module. Is there anyway at which it can be executed using lli? Thank you in advance Best -- This email was Anti Virus checked by Security Gateway. -------------- next part
2016 May 12
2
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros
On Thu, 12 May 2016 16:40:44 +0100 David Chisnall via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The end result is that shortly after a release (sometimes every alternate release) is branched a load of downstream projects update to the new APIs, test things, and find a bunch of regressions that have been sitting in the tree for months. We then have to scrabble to bisect and try
2004 Apr 02
1
why "xcopy /d" doesn't work
Hi Germano, I just found your post regarding Samba and xcopy /d switch at http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-October/000699.html. This is also driving me mad. I was interested to know if you ever found a way around this problem ? It only seems to be a problem for me with 2000 and XP workstation. 98 works fine. Regards James
2015 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Weekly - #57, Feb 2nd 2015
LLVM Weekly - #57, Feb 2nd 2015 =============================== If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/57>. Welcome to the fifty-seventh issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex Bradbury](http://asbradbury.org).
2016 Mar 31
0
llvmlite 0.10.0
Hello, We are happy to release version 0.10.0 of llvmlite. llvmlite is a light-weight Python binding for LLVM (compatible with Python 2.7 as well as Python 3.4 and later). It stems from the needs of the Numba community and is geared towards creating JIT compilers. llvmlite is available both as source code and as binaries for a number of platforms. Source code is available on PyPI and Github:
2017 Mar 02
0
cifs-utils release 6.7 ready for download
The main change in this release is to address some regressions that crept in when we switched to a scheme that does not rely on walking /tmp to look for credcaches. We now will use the information from the kernel about the initiating pid, reach into that task's environment and scrape out the $KRB5CCNAME variable. This can be problematic in setuid situations, so we avoid doing that for the
2016 Dec 18
0
LLD status update and performance chart
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:43:16 -0500 Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I agree that if an API user violates the API of a library, it is > appropriate for the library to abort with a fatal error. <unlurking> Is it? If you pass an invalid fd to the libc, it replies with a EBADF, it doesn't crash hard. Most mature libraries have guards
2019 Feb 21
3
Preserving debug metadata across optimization
Hi, I've recently run into a problem of missing !dbg metadata after the code has been optimized (even opt -O1). The original code was generated using llvmlite python package and I've verified that all instructions have their !dbg metadata present. After optimizing the module (even opt -O1) I see that some instructions (~25%) don't have any dbg metadata. These are mostly getelementptr
2006 May 31
9
How can I make this thing work on IE?
Hello... i''ve been read lots of posts talking about this kind o mess in IE... but no one tells how could this be possible to work... :-) Any suggestions?? thanks... <html> <head> <script src="prototype.js"></script> </head> <body> <table border=1> <tbody> <tr id="0" name="0"> <td>LINE
2015 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Developer Policy for LLVM C API
Hal Finkel <hfinkel <at> anl.gov> writes: > > Do you require long-term cross-release ABI and/or API stability > from the C API that you're using? Do these > other projects? For the record, in llvmlite and Numba we don't require C API stability for two reasons: 1) the C API is not enough for us and we rely on bits of the C++ API 2) we also rely on other details