similar to: SMT solvers in clang SA

We are currently implementing the backends for other solvers (you can follow the progress here: https://github.com/mikhailramalho/clang). So far we got Boolector, MathSAT and Yices ready. CVC4 should be done soon. When used to refute bugs, they all give roughly the same results: a ~5% speedup if there are refuted bugs or a ~5% slowdown if no bug is refuted. I've only tried to analyze one

Hi, I am wondering if anyone could run ArrayBoundChecks located in SafeCode-llvm37 (https://github.com/jtcriswell/safecode-llvm37) on llvm-3.8? Thanks. Syed -- Rafi

On 4/9/07, Domagoj Babic <babic.domagoj at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Traditionally, such analyses have been considered too expensive to be > practical, and were mostly an academic curiosity. The core of the > problem is the lack of adequate automated decision procedures which > could quickly determine whether a set of constraints is satisfiable or > not, and if it is

Dear LLVMers, This email is intended for those interested in path-sensitive analysis, integer overflow analysis, static analysis, and (perhaps) loop invariant computation. Traditionally, such analyses have been considered too expensive to be practical, and were mostly an academic curiosity. The core of the problem is the lack of adequate automated decision procedures which could quickly

Hi all, I am a fourth year EE bachelors student who is very interested in compilers. I have taken the only compilers course offered in my school and did an independent study with my CS professor. Although I'll begin to work in a couple of months, I definitely want to pursue my interest in compiler design and optimization as a PhD in the future. I am very interested in the z3 SMT solver

Thanks for the fast response John. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015, at 04:51 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear Ed, > > First, someone has updated the DSA code in the poolalloc project to LLVM > 3.7, and a Master's student worked for me over the summer to update a > large chunk of SAFECode to LLVM 3.7. However, the update to LLVM 3.7 > isn't finished (we need to finish integrating

Dear Colleague: I am glad to hear from you. I was going to contact you and ask if you have notes on the steps involved on how you implemented LSODA. I will gladly take the project on. In addition to dassl, I want to implement ODESSA also. In other words, my project is a "suite" of ode solvers for R. The application of these solvers will be to the study of the distribution of

Dear all, I want to work with R in an optimization problem and I was wondering if there are any available solvers. I found RCplex package but downloading it, I get problems. Why? Is it not free? are there any other solvers available? many thanks! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Cplex-solver-and-optimization-in-R-tp3703385p3703385.html Sent from the R help

Anyone had any experience of using this phone with asterisk ? Trying to find out if I can provision it using tftp / http Thanks Julian -- Follow "Ode To Politics" by HB Tasker at http://twitter.com/HBTasker

Hello -- The question I have is about the gmm() function from the 'gmm' package (v. 1.4-5). The manual accompanying the package says that the gmm() function is programmed to use either of four numerical solvers -- optim, optimize, constrOptim, or nlminb -- for the minimization of the GMM objective function. I wonder whether there is a way to pass controls to a solver used while calling

Dear All, I was using rk4 and lsoda to solve a ODE system. However, both of them gave bad accurate solutions, especially compared with Matlab solver ODE45. For example, ODE45 gave solutions that can go to a stable level (about 1.6) when time goes to infinity, however, the solutions from lsoda are decreasing to very very small (about 1e-130) numbers. Does R have more accurate ODE solvers as

# Hi all, # consider the following code (please, run it: # it's fully working and requires just few minutes # to finish): require(CreditMetrics) require(clusterGeneration) install.packages("Rdonlp2", repos= c("http://R-Forge.R-project.org", getOption("repos"))) install.packages("Rsolnp2", repos= c("http://R-Forge.R-project.org",

Hello Ted, 2013/9/11 Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> > Hi All, > > About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol > support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: > > http://www.apcmedia.com/**salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-**98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf<http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf>

Hi All, About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf "Application Note #176 Modbus Implementation in APC Smart-UPS" The APC "announcement" appeared on their site in their user blogs by an APC employee, here:

Hi, I'm using Dovecot's (1.0.rc2) 'deliver' (no sieve) as LDA - calling it from a .qmail file. It seems that 'deliver' destroys "message/rfc822" attachments (forward as attachment). My .qmail file looks like this, and use qmail to deliver a copy directly to my Maildir, and 'deliver' to deliver a second copy of the same message to the same Maildir: %

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, 14:32 Paulo Matos <pmatos at linki.tools wrote: > > > On 12 February 2019 18:59:21 CET, Mikhail Ramalho < > mikhail.ramalho at gmail.com> wrote: > >I _think_ there is a problem with the license as well: Z3 is MIT, so > >clang > >would have to be released with Z3's license. > > I don't think that's a problem. You are not

Hi all, This is probably a very simple question but I cannot figure out how to do it. I run the fourthcorner method with my data and would like to adjust the p values for multiple comparisons using Holm correction. When I run the fourthcorner I obtain the results in yellow. What do I need to do to be able to aply the Holm correction to those p values? > library(ade4) > four1 <-

OK, I've managed to do it: I was trying to push it from a build/ directory, maybe that's why the git apply was failing. Pushing the commit from the root of the repo worked. Em qua, 28 de nov de 2018 às 16:40, Mikhail Ramalho < mikhail.ramalho at gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi, > > The patch only changes one file in clang. Here's the patch: >

30.03.2023 06:25, Gary Dale via samba ?????: .. > Baokports are for people who need something that the stable version doesn't provide. That's not me. I run Debian/Stable on my servers for a reason. I > run Testing on my workstation because I want to help test things. And I run it my new laptop because it requires drivers that aren't available in Stable. Right now you need a

Hi Zhongxing, On 4/8/07, Zhongxing Xu <xuzhongxing at gmail.com> wrote: > I think the real difficult thing in path sensitive program analysis (or > symbolic execution) is not the lack of decision procedures, but the > translation of arbitrary pointer operations and library function calls in > C/C++ program into the mathematics supported by the automated theorem > prover. >