similar to: Can i reduce my clang/JIT app in size?

my build environment: Win7 x64 VStudio 2017 Community Edition 15.8.4 (latest) CMake 3.12.1 (x86) git 2.19.0 (latest, x64) Python 2.7.2 (x86) my build steps: open VS2017 x64 developer command prompt cd D:\projects\fun\jit_tests mkdir llvm cd llvm git clone https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm mkdir llvm-build cd llvm-build cmake -G "Visual Studio 15 2017 Win64" -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON

Hey Bjorn, Were you able to figure this out or is it still broken for you? Our scenario is a little bit different, but I have a theory as to what may be going wrong. What linker are you using when you compile your project with clang-cl? I am wondering whether the version of the linker and/or the libraries that you are using is too old in comparison to the one used for the clang compilation.

first: thank you for helping out >I might try compiling your source from the VS's Developer Command Prompt: >cmake --build . --target Fibonacci >Does this work? call "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Community\VC\Auxiliary\Build\vcvars64.bat" cd llvm-build cmake --build . --config Debug --target Fibonacci building Fibonacci example works BUT

I found a private ErrorStr member, but didn't find the get function of this member, could you tell me how I can get the error message? On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:02 PM mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Isn’t there a method in EngineBuilder to get the error message or > something? > I assume it’s you didn’t link in the JIT module > > Zhang > > 在

Dear Sir/Madam Our company, 4Js software, has developed an SQL data base software that runs under different operating systems: Windows, Linux, Mac OS X. This software compiles each SQL statement into a C program that is compiled "on the fly" and executed by our JIT, Just In Time compiler. We wanted to port it to Apple's iOS, and spent a lot of time retargetting the JIT for

Hi, I my case I needed to trace the execution of a specific .ll file. I wanted to know when a store and load instruction were executed. Maybe extending the Interpreter class was not the best option so I'm happy to hear suggestions. As a curiosity, why do you think that class should be rewritten? Thanks On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 08:15 mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > I dont quite

LLVM is built in Release mode. The version is 6.0.0. I think that a similar code worked on verison 3.9.0. It is probably a null pointer dereference occurring in eraseFromParent(). I checked and reconfirmed that the instruction had no uses. Perhaps I should rebuild LLVM. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:03 PM, mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Hmmmm that’s strange. Do you get an

Hi However, frontend may also do various operations on the source code and one line number and column number could map to more than one binary address. Why LLVM IR cannot? Regrads Muhui 2018-06-12 23:18 GMT+08:00 mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io>: > In theory that’s not exactly possible/accurate. Due to various operations > in the Backend like Instruction Legalization, one IR

Hi. Thanks. I changed the code but the problem exists. This is my new code which is again very simple: ... bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override { vector<Instruction *> dels; dels.clear(); for (inst_iterator It = inst_begin(&F), Ie = inst_end(&F); It != Ie;) { Instruction *I = &*(It++); if (auto* op = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I)) { IRBuilder<NoFolder>

To my knowledge that intrinsic IS generated by frontends like Clang when using _builtin_return_address(), i could be wrong though Zhang > 在 2018年9月5日，10:47，Bekket McClane via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 写道： > > and

Hi Paul Thanks for your comments. Suppose I can generate the control flow graph via LLVM Pass or the default option like '-dot-cfg' with opt. However, the control flow graph is based on llvm IR level. I would like to have a control flow graph based on binary level. Thus, I want to map the IR to binary address. As far as I know, we used to use the debug information to map the IR to source

For the same reason GCC allowed the attribute. Even if I want to use/inline a function later on in the pipeline. Regards, Soham Sinha PhD Student, Department of Computer Science Boston University On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:30 AM mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Out of curiosity, how does an unused declaration affect the emitted object > file > > Zhang > > > 在

It does, when the function has a body. When it doesn't, it ignores <https://godbolt.org/g/2BCvht>. The body might be provided later on in the toolchain via linking a library. Regards, Soham Sinha PhD Student, Department of Computer Science Boston University On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:25 AM Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > It works for me: > >

在 2018年05月29日 14:58, mayuyu.io 写道: > Any hint on the date of LLVM Social ShangHai? Wu Wei scheduled July 1th http://hellollvm.org/ > > Zhang > >> 在 2018年5月29日，14:22，Leslie Zhai via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 写道： >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for your response! >> >> Wu Wei made this happen! and he is organizing LLVM social in

There is no “switch” instruction in the target object code. It usually gets compiled into a switch table with instructions to load from it. Afaik Zhang > 在 2019年12月26日，17:49，n3v3rm03 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 写道： > > Sorry I found an early thread discussing this question. I guess I shouldn't create lower switch pass like this. > However, I have another

Hi, I going through the Interpreter class source code and I think making almost all the visit methods (maybe not visitInstruction yet) would really help anybody that wants to create any sort of tracer or similar. Would be a patch in this case worthy? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I have encountered the following instruction: %.0.i = phi i8* [ %9, %8 ], [ %11, %10 ] How can I get the %8 and %10? I'm using http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1PHINode.html as a reference but I cannot understand how to do that. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I want to create an add instruction that takes two constant operands at the LLVM IR level. I use the IRBuilder class, but nothing happens. Here is part of the runOnFunction() method of my function pass: ... LLVMContext &Context = F.getContext(); IRBuilder<> builder(&Instruction); Value *Lef = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Context), 4); Value *Rig =

I just copy the latest code in HowToUseJIT and run, but the EngineBuilder(std::move(Owner)).create() keeps return null, any idea why? Here's my CMakeList: cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.12) project(llvm_test) set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14) find_package(LLVM REQUIRED CONFIG) llvm_map_components_to_libnames(llvm_libs support core irreader orcjit native) add_executable(llvm_test main.cpp)

Possibly unrelated but since someone asked, I wonder why we don’t have monorepo for releases? For example a .tar.s containing all LLVM6.0 components placed at correct location Zhang > 在 2018年8月30日，18:16，Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 写道： > > Thanks! >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:31 PM NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: