similar to: [RfC] A proposal of adding SPIR-V Toolchain in Clang

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 18:47, Nicholas Wilson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I was going to wait until Neil Trevett got back to me about becoming a > SPIR-V TSG advisor but this seems like just as good an opportunity. Please > see the previous discussion [1] if you have not already, there were many > relevant points made. > > First, I’d like to note

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 09/11/2018 12:50 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 18:47, Nicholas Wilson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> I was going to wait until Neil Trevett got back to me

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 19:40, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 09/11/2018 12:50 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 18:47, Nicholas Wilson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > > > I was going to wait until Neil Trevett got back to me

On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 16:52, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 09/12/2018 02:32 PM, Matthias Braun wrote: > > > > > >> On Sep 11, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 09/11/2018 12:50 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > >>> On Mon,

> SPIR-V does not have to be a part of LLVM for you to do this. You can add > the SPIR-V target to clang and then define a SPIR-V toolchain (i.e. clang/Driver/Toolchains) > that uses the external tool to translate LLVM IR to SPIR-V. Ok. I guess if Clang community accepts this way, it would be better to set up the SPIRV converter as a tool of LLVM. So the question is are there any

On 02/27/2018 05:07 AM, Anastasia Stulova wrote: >> SPIR-V does not have to be a part of LLVM for you to do this. You can add >> the SPIR-V target to clang and then define a SPIR-V toolchain (i.e. clang/Driver/Toolchains) >> that uses the external tool to translate LLVM IR to SPIR-V. > > > Ok. I guess if Clang community accepts this way, it would be better to set up

> This is great to see. Is this code the basis of the forks that Anastasia talked about or did those come from somewhere else? Yes, indeed the base is https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM/ and then there are multiple forks that include some rework as well (some of which were announced on the LLVM channels). I think the biggest problems we are trying to solve is: 1. Keeping up to date

On 02/26/2018 09:25 AM, Anastasia Stulova wrote: > >> This is great to see. Is this code the basis of the forks that Anastasia > talked about or did those come from somewhere else? > > > Yes, indeed the base is https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM/ and then there are multiple forks that include some rework as well (some of which were announced on the LLVM channels).

On 2018-02-21 — 14:55, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > On 02/21/2018 12:15 AM, Tomeu Vizoso via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > for a few months already I have been asking around for opinions on how > > people could best work together on Khronos' SPIR-V <-> LLVM-IR converter > > and some consensus seems to have formed. > > > > Most of the

> It's important to demonstrate that there is a developer community backing > the tool and that it won't be abandoned if it is added as an llvm > sub-project. > > -Tom Just to complete the picture, this is an initiative from within Khronos Group to unify our effort to make this available as an LLVM component. A number of companies have been involved in the original

On 02/21/2018 03:34 PM, Pierre Moreau wrote: > On 2018-02-21 — 14:55, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: >> On 02/21/2018 12:15 AM, Tomeu Vizoso via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> for a few months already I have been asking around for opinions on how >>> people could best work together on Khronos' SPIR-V <-> LLVM-IR converter >>> and

Hi Chris, The main benefit for LLVM to include SPIRV support directly is to increase the number of users and developers in the area of heterogeneous computing, e.g. GPUs, FPGAs, DSPs. We want to increase the number of such devices that LLVM natively supports by adding compilation to SPIRV due to the shortage of proprietary backends in upstream LLVM. Just to clarify we are currently suggesting

I don't see any problem mangling it to be honest even though there seems to be only one prototype anyways. We could add restrict in as well. Cheers, Anastasia ________________________________ From: Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> Sent: 17 September 2016 05:32:54 To: Liu, Yaxun (Sam) Cc: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; llvm-dev; Bader, Alexey (alexey.bader at intel.com); Anastasia

On Feb 27, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 02/27/2018 05:07 AM, Anastasia Stulova wrote: >>> SPIR-V does not have to be a part of LLVM for you to do this. You can add >>> the SPIR-V target to clang and then define a SPIR-V toolchain (i.e. clang/Driver/Toolchains) >>> that uses the external tool to translate

Thanks for your feedback Philip. Could you perhaps explain what the downsides to LLVM are of accepting this as a subproject as I can't really see any myself. Neil ________________________________ From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Sent: 06 March 2018 23:07:54 To: Anastasia Stulova; Chris

+ Alexey Anastasia According to SPIR spec v1.2 s2.10.3 2.10.3 The printf function The printf function is supported, and is mangled according to its prototype as follows: int printf(constant char * restrict fmt, ... ) Note that the ellipsis formal argument (...) is mangled to argument type specifier z It seems printf should be mangled. Alexey/Anastasia, What do you think? Thanks. Sam From:

Dear all, I have a couple of questions of SPIR-V implementation for OpenCL. The first one is about the tool spirv-opt from the project SPIRV-TOOLS. When you use that tool like "spirv-opt test.spv -o test.spv", it changes something at the file or it does not do anything by not using any flag? I think it is like a "No action" flag but I am not 100% sure about that. The second

Thanks, Marco! If there is enough interest in this topic we can also organize a separate round table for this discussion. Cheers, Anastasia ________________________________ From: Marco Antognini <Marco.Antognini at arm.com> Sent: 18 October 2019 14:42 To: Anastasia Stulova <Anastasia.Stulova at arm.com>; Simone Atzeni via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; clang developer

I note that there was a talk recently at EuroLLVM SPIR-V and LLVM about and so I want to get this message out soon so as to avoid duplicated effort. I have an up to date backend for SPIR-V on an up to date fork (~2-3 weeks behind) of LLVM, transplanted and “modernised” from Khronos’ SPIRV-LLVM that I plan on integrating into LLVM trunk. While it is usable in it’s current form there are several

On 27 Feb 2018, at 9:07 pm, Anastasia Stulova via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > SPIR-V does not have to be a part of LLVM for you to do this. You can add > the SPIR-V target to clang and then define a SPIR-V toolchain (i.e. clang/Driver/Toolchains) > that uses the external tool to translate LLVM IR to SPIR-V. Ok. I guess