similar to: Adding an trinsics in x86

Hi，every one. This problem has been bothering me for several days.I really hope that you can help me. I want to add an trinsics in X86. This trinsics can compare two numbers and return the larger. There are the changes I do as fllowing. In /tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsX86.def : BUILTIN(__builtin_x86_max_qb, "iii", "") In include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsX86.td : let

--------- Forwarded Message --------- From： Tianhao Shen <17862703959 at 163.com> Date： 11/14/2018 09:31 To： craig.topper at gmail.com <craig.topper at gmail.com> Subject： Re: [llvm-dev] How to define an instruction Hi, Craig Thank you for replying to me. I guess that you misunderstand my meaning about "can'r run". I just want to run my instruction by LLVM using the

Thank you for answering my confusion. I have another questions. If I add really instructions instead intrinsics ,can I reach my purpose? I guess ,the answer is "can't". I don't find the anything about how machine to do about instructions,especially "ALU" instructions. Thank you again, Tianhao Shen On 11/14/2018 13:42，Craig Topper<craig.topper at gmail.com>

Hi,every one. I' in trouble again. I want add a new intrinsic mapping a new instruction. I add the int_x86_max_qb as fllowing: def int_x86_max_qb: GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_x86_max_qb">, Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_i32_ty, llvm_i32_ty], [Commutative]>; BUILTIN(__builtin_x86_max_qb, "iii", "") I define the intrinsic as Pseudo instruction,it

Hello，everyone. I am very embarrassed to ask such a simple question. I want to add an intrinsics(named max_qb) in x86 backend. In include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsX86.td, I add a intrinsics (GCCBuiltin). In clang( BuiltinsX86.def ), I add a BUILTIN. And in x86 backend , I change : the X86InstrInfo.td to add def X86max_qb_flag , X86InstrArithmetic.td to add define of instruction , X86ISelLowering.cpp to

Hi, For now no. But I will add this three builtins to CGBuiltin.cpp. If you want, you can be a reviewer of this change. Regards Michael Zuckerman From: Craig Topper [mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 04:53 To: Zuckerman, Michael <michael.zuckerman at intel.com> Subject: Re: r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa vmovntpd vmovntps

Hi , In the future, we will address this issue. Regards Michael Zuckerman From: Eric Christopher [mailto:echristo at gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 19:54 To: Zuckerman, Michael <michael.zuckerman at intel.com>; Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa

Brad, I found your posting of 2/20/2004 with the subject line of "upgraded to 3.0.2 -> funkyness in machine accounts" while investigating a similar problem. I upgraded to 3.0.2 last week from 3.0.0. I have a system which I just added to the domain successfully. However, when I attempt to log a domain user onto that machine, I get this error: The system cannot log you on to

I just took on a new client who is having a curious problem with mangled names. Here's the history as I understand it: Originally they were on an NT server and there was no issue. My predecessor moved them to a samba server running on gentwo. I do not know what version of samba or how he moved the data, but when he did so, any files and folders with more than 8 characters started

Im going to install a samba domain at 4 of my sites but I trying to take of the best way to do this. going to have siteA, siteBm, siteC, and siteD. There will be an ipsec between all sites. In the past if i had to do a setup like that would to a box at each site and from there I would make rsync the samba passwd file to all the sites to keep logins in sync. Is there a better ways to to this?

> From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-bcc@deepeddy.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 > > [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) > ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N > o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base="ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com"

nmbd has been dying on me occasionally. I'm running mandrake 9.2 with samba3-server-3.0.0-2mdk. We've got our users in ldap but I'd seen this symptom previously when I was using an earlier version of samba that didn't support ldap. There is nothing useful in the logs and a PS shows a nmb process still running. This last time around, I had a ptrace running on both nmbd

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:

I'm seeing some very slow setup times. Here's what I did. I started ethereal while things were running fine and then I waited until my windows box didn't show up in findsmb (I have keepalive set to "yes", so I don't see why it times out at all). I then went into "My computer" which was very slow. When I look in ethereal, I see some interesting nubmers in

I am currently working on DAGToDAGISel class for MIPS and am trying to figure out a way to use INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN for an intrinsic which can return a value. My intrinsic is defined as: Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty],[llvm_i32_ty,llvm_i32_ty,llvm_i32_ty,llvm_i32_ty],[IntrReadWriteArgMem]>; i.e. it has four arguments and one return value In DAGToDAGISel when I try to pass it with four arguments and

<table cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0' border='0' ><tr><td style='font: inherit;'>Hi,<br>I tried creating intrinsics which are to be<br>placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in HW).<br>These intrinsics are to take care of the data dependencies of the set of

Hello, LLVM's intrinsic overloading mechanism does not currently support overloading on pointer types. Patches to implement this would be welcome. Dan On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote: > Hi, > I tried creating intrinsics which are to be > placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a > basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in

Hi, All, Suppose I define one memory read only intrinsic function "foo" in Intrinsics.td like this def int_foo : Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_i32_ty, llvm_i32_ty], [IntrReadMem]>; Suppose I have the following IR, which means the intrinsic function "foo" is called 10 times in a loop. Since the parameters of function "foo" are invariant and the function

Hi, I'm trying to create a Pattern that looks something like this: def my_inst : Instruction < let OutOperandList = (outs REG:$dst); let InOperandList = (ins imm:$src); let Uses = [R0]; > def int_my_intrinsic : Intrinsic < [llvm_float_ty], [llvm_i32_ty, llvm_i32_ty, llvm_i32_ty], [] >; def : Pattern < (int_my_intrinsic imm:$a, imm:$b, imm:$c), [(set R0, (MOV_IMM