similar to: Using VMKit to convert Java Bytecode to LLVM IR

Hi everybody! I'm Josef and I'm working at Oracle Labs on Sulong [1,2], the LLVM IR execution engine in GraalVM [3]. In addition to executing bare bitcode files, Sulong also accepts ELF files with embedded bitcode sections. Therefore, it would be great if LLD in (Full)LTO mode would support embedding bitcode sections to the resulting object file. Is that something that would be

Hi Does LLVM dynamically run the program to obtain profiling information like branch weight? if so, can we access the information regarding this run like the number of instructions that have been executed dynamically between two specific points of the program? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi everyone, we started a new open source project Sulong: https://github.com/graalvm/sulong. Sulong is a LLVM IR interpreter with JIT compilation running on top of the JVM. By using the Truffle framework, it implements speculative optimizations such as inlining of function pointer calls through AST rewriting. One area of our research is to provide alternative ways of executing LLVM bitcode that

I am following the code of the project https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/java/trunk/lib/Compiler/Resolver.cpp, But some class/function of it is not present in my source code due to replacement of this function in newer llvm verion. Can someone please suggest me the alternative approach of these function in latest llvm version. Here are those classes and functions : 1) PATypeHolder 2)

Thanks for your response! On 30/01/2019 20:18, Rui Ueyama wrote: > Hi Josef, > > Let me clarify my understanding. Do you want to keep original bitcode > files in the output executable when doing LTO, so that the resulting > executable contains both compiled bitcode (which is in native machine > instructions) and original bitcode files? Exactly! Kind of analogous to what

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: >> Supporting OpenJDK is very interesting indeed, as full 1.6 support is >> important to us.  How intense of a project would undertaking this be? >> And is this something you could semi-mentor on if I were to undertake >> it? :). > > Yes, no problem. I'd be happy to help

Hi Philip, I also tried that including file: #include "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h" but error remain same. Please help. On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 2:58 AM Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ratnesh, > > the PassManager used in that example has moved into the legacy namespace: > http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1legacy_1_1PassManager.html > >

Hi fellow devs, I was looking for converting LLVM IR to JavaBytecode by using lljvm project of https://github.com/davidar/lljvm They don't seem to compile, once i run *make* in the root directory it give me the error : cd include && make all make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rtiwari1/llvm_new/lljvm/include' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[1]: Leaving

That source file was removed from LLVM in r232397 on March 16, 2015. It looks like lljvm hasn't been updated in a long time. LLVM's C++ APIs are not stable, so there is no expectation that a project built against LLVM's C++ API in 2015 would build or reasonably function against LLVM trunk. The project probably works against LLVM 3.6.2 which was (I believe) the last LLVM release to

Hi Nicolas, Reviving old thread of sorts... thank you very much for your earlier response--I apologize for not responding to tell you how very helpful your information was! Didn't come back because you gave me everything I needed at the time :). Anyway: On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, nicolas geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Will

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:05 AM Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > That feature is probably too specific to your project. Most projects that > use LTO are using LTO just because it generates better code. Your project > is special as your program itself can also interpret LLVM bitcode, but > that's not the case for most other programs. > I

I have code that uses OpaqueType::get(), it was used to be in llvm/IR/DerivedType.h , but it is removed now. What should I use for it replacement. Also, it is using #include <llvm/Bytecode/WriteBytecodePass.h> , but I do not found any WriteBytecodePass.h in my source code. Please tell me, what should I use in replacement of these. Thanks& Regards, Ratnesh Tiwari -------------- next

Hi, I see that now vmkit2 contains the last revisions of the project, so I follow these instructions to compile vmkit : http://vmkit2.gforge.inria.fr/start.php I download and compile LLVM without errors. I have tested with and without optimizations but this is the same for the errors. My configuration for LLVM is just : ./configure; make Apparently we can build vmkit with OpenJDK instead of GNU

Hi Julien, Due to some new commits, openjdk build is broken for the moment. We are fixing this. You can temporarily use the following commit to try VMKit with OpenJDK implementation. d9bf3794d66a116999f8f16d0799fba6fe5bd822 just call the following command in your vmkit directory: git checkout d9bf3794d66a116999f8f16d0799fba6fe5bd822 Harris Bakiras On 03/18/2013 10:12 AM, Julien Pagès

Hi, I am begineer to llvm, implementing a main.cpp from https://github.com/davidar/lljvm/blob/master/backend/main.cpp A) : When I am declaring a command: * PassManager PM* * PM.add(new DataLayout td)* It shows error: > *error: missing template arguments before ‘PM’* * PassManager PM;* ^ >*main_test.cpp:48:2: error: ‘PM’ was not declared in this scope* *

Hi all, After "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" Message on compiling VMkit. after the make starts compiling mmtk-vmkit.jar In verbose mode the following command errors out: /home/usr/vmkit/Release+Asserts/bin/vmjc -load=/home/usr/vmkit/Release+Asserts/lib/MMTKRuntime.so -load=/home/usr/vmkit/Release+Asserts/lib/MMTKMagic.so -LowerMagic /home/usr/vmkit/mmtk/java/Release+Asserts/mmtk-vmkit.jar

Hi all, After "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" Message on compiling VMkit. The make starts compiling mmtk-vmkit.jar The following command errors out: Compiling 'mmtk-vmkit.jar' /vmkit/Release+Asserts/bin/vmjc -load=/vmkit/Release+Asserts/lib/MMTKRuntime.so -load=/vmkit/Release+Asserts/lib/MMTKMagic.so -LowerMagic /vmkit/mmtk/java/Release+Asserts/mmtk-vmkit.jar -disable-exceptions

Greetings, I am searching for an alternative to sun's java implementation - one that is not under gpl.. I've been reading the vmkit code for JNI.. And I notice that it is not completely filled out yet... That's fine though, I see there is filled in function like most of the non implemented functions.. Couple of questions: Is the entire llvm required for java/cli vmkit to run?

Hi all, OpenJDK8 jdk8u-dev[1] is just able to work after compiled with LLVM 3.9.1 for X86: $ ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-slowdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version openjdk version "1.8.0-internal-debug" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-internal-debug-xiangzhai_2018_09_09_21_08-b00) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.71-b00-debug, mixed mode) $ strings

Hi all, I'm interested in using VMKit rather extensively in a project of mine. I was hoping to get feedback on a few vmkit-related questions from those more familiar: --Is there a 'best' version to use? I'd be inclined to use the 2.9 release since it's a stationary target, but curious if I should try to follow ToT.  Is there a recommended best practice? --What features of