similar to: error: ordered comparison between pointer and zero ('address' (aka 'unsigned char *') and 'int')

Hi Thomas, Thanks for your kind response! Please review my backport for hs25, thanks a lot! diff -r 3544d85cfe11 src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp --- a/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Thu Jul 19 10:00:36 2018 +0100 +++ b/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Fri Jul 20 10:06:37 2018 +0800 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ // Check whether val is not-null-decoded compressed oop, // i.e. will grab into the base of the heap

Hi Thomas, Looks good. Your changes in loopPredicate.cpp does not match original changes - they miss iff->is_RangeCheck() check [1]. But in JDK8 we did not have specialized RangeCheckNode class in C2. Suggested fix should be fine fro jdk 8u. Reviewed. Please, when sending RFA ( approval request) use original 8174050 bug id. Thanks, Vladimir [1]

Hi LLVM developers, I am implementing Loong Language[1] using Clang FrontEnd and LLVM MiddleEnd. I add `wire`[2] Builtin Type, and clang is able to parse very small testcase fulladder[3] but failed to work for 10+K loc RISCV E203 project[4]: Loongson clang version 7.0.0 (git at github.com:Loong-Language/loong-clang.git 8f7e826f27abbe12ea08d9563490298c38d3adc1) (git at

Hi all, Thanks for Aleksandar Beserminji great job: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50437 It is not easy to reproduce the LLVMBUG-38221[1] by building OpenJDK8, it needs some workaround https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xiangzhai/jdk8u-dev/master/Workaround-compile-with-llvm.patch LLVM toolchain[2] is just able to compile OpenJDK8 for mips64el now: http://hg.loongnix.org/ 1.

Hello, When reading the documentation regarding the fileserver configuration, I found it very handy. The idea to create a virtual share which points to a location on the fileserver. However, I may have run into a problem. What I wanted to do was to have this share point out a location and under that location, I''d create what would be a relative root. Part of the reason for this is you

Hi all, I am trying to add the ShareThis Hovering buttons to my Rails 3 application but have no luck. I got the embed code from http://sharethis.com/publishers/get-hovering-buttons. In order to prove that the problem is specific to Rails, I put the same code into a HTML file outside the rails app and also a pure HTML file inside the public directory (without routed to controller) of my rails app.

Hi, Since I''m about to deploy puppet on a large number of hosts, I got a little tired of inputing configuration files which basically held very similar information. I wrote a small script where I intended the following: - when you encounter a file that you realize should be handled by puppet, you run my script with the filename as argument. The script looks at the mode, user,

Hi, I've made a simple patch to allow running LLVM's test suite under valgrind. By default it doesn't do any memory leak checking because valgrind reports problems in most tests.. To run the tests with valgrind one has to run 'cd test && make VG=1', similar with what we have with clang. So is this patch ok and/or desirable? Regards, Nuno P.S.: Warning: it takes a

Hello, Consider the following; You have a number of sites, all controlled by puppet. You have identified which files that are common to every host, and then which files are common to any particular site. Finally, you have the files which are private to the node in question. What I was wondering was if it would be possible to have some sort of directory hierarchy which has some kind of

Hi there, I would like to make a 'bumps chart' like the ones described e.g. here: http://junkcharts.typepad.com/junk_charts/bumps_chart/ Purpose: I'd like to plot the proportion of people in select countries living for less then one USD pr day in 1994 and 2004 respectively. I have already constructed a barplot - but I think a bumps chart would be better # The barplot and data

I actually find Samba a very kewl server app so the subject isn't coming from someone that has a preference for Netware over samba. My issue is actually two-fold, one being the record locking problems in Samba and the other being the slowness of dos apps in samba. I'm not going to post any log messages here as I don't feel that for this post they're really very relevant.

Hi all, I met this error(title) when i was trying to compile llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7 on loongson2f,a mips compatible platform.I also failed to build a cross-compiler and the error message was the same . Is that means llvm-gcc cannot support mips back-end now? Thanks. Here is my configure options: $export TARGET=mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu $../../src/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/configure

Hi, I'm running openldap and samba3.0.1 from my debian system, but I have used many many hours trying to get samba to validate users on the ldap... And is now turning to the last resort ... This is my configuration __________________________________________________ the important lines in smb.conf looks like this... -------------------------------------------------- [global] workgroup

Hello, I was trying to compile a simple program with the CppBackend like so: $ clang str_arg.c -emit-llvm -S $ llc -march=cpp str_arg.ll It produces a file `str_arg.cpp` as expected, however it doesn't seem that the resulting file is correct. For once, it includes `<llvm/Analysis/Verifier.h>` which seems to have been moved to `llvm/IR/Verifier.h` as far back as 2013. My question is

On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 20:01, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > I just did a very quick experiment where I made lowerFP_TO_SINT and > lowerFP_TO_SINT_STORE return SDValue() (which is the marker for "I > don't want to handle this"). I just tried this, but the compiler still crashes with the same error. Maybe our experiments were different. To make

> > The word 'all' is what still bothers me here. If any one piece of the information is derived from incorrect information in the triple, then the behaviour will likely be incorrect. > > If it's possible to be derived from the triple then it's going to be correct or the triple is incorrect. > If it's something that's overridden later because it can't be

Rewrote the ABI example in terms of clang -cc1as which is a supported tool. Note that the same problems exist and that they are unrelated to the existence of TargetMachine or not since TargetMachine gets the relevant information from the Triple it holds. This information is incorrect, even as a starting point. Please do read the other examples in my previous email. It contains a number of

Hi, I am wondering why we dont support PPC32 LE? Here is the output of llvm-mc --version, in which only PPC32, PPC64 & PPC64LE are supported. $ llvm-mc --version LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 3.6.2 Optimized build with assertions. Built Aug 2 2015 (11:39:46). Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.4.0 Host CPU: core-avx2 Registered Targets: aarch64 - AArch64

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz (sha1sum: 2dedc6136d7cfbac8348652c543887964d92393c) > Native: All ok > Cross compiling to MIPS: All ok > > clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: f286149dbb2ea7e194c5c3719b6cded476f6e65f) > All ok

> > Note that the same problems exist and that they are unrelated to the existence > > of TargetMachine or not since TargetMachine gets the relevant information from > > the Triple it holds. This information is incorrect, even as a starting point. > > I believe we're going to disagree here as the TargetMachine does not get all of its > information from the Triple -