similar to: Super-verbose failure mode for FileCheck

Hi, I am trying to compile a simple program with Clang 3.3 on Linux and used -pg and -O2 option. The program would crash with segfault. Interestingly if I compile it with -pg option only it works. Do you have any idea why it crashes? And any workaround? $ cat myprog.c int main() { return 0; } $ clang -v -pg -O2 myprog.c clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) Target:

Hi Qiao, On 24/07/13 08:23, Qiao Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to compile a simple program with Clang 3.3 on Linux and used -pg and -O2 option. The program would crash with segfault. Interestingly if I compile it with -pg option only it works. Do you have any idea why it crashes? And any workaround? > > $ cat myprog.c > int main() { > return 0; > } > > $

Hi, I have a couple of quick questions regarding R. 1) I have a ".First" function that automatically loads the quadprog package into the workspace. The .First function resides in R and is only saved if I save the workspace. The exact function is as follows: .First<-function() { library(quadprog) } Is there any way that this function can be saved outside of R? That is, is there

Ideally/the better integration with Buildbot would be to have these outputs referenced as "associated files" (it's been a while since I played with buildbot - I remember finding this and considering how it could be done, but not getting all the way through) so they'd come back as actual files on the build master, linked from the results page that you could click on to

Hi all, Is anyone using oprofile? I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if it is opreport, or just me. In case it is something just plain daft I am doing, here is how it goes: opcontrol --reset opcontrol --setup --no-vmlinux opcontrol --start ... now I run my program, /tmp/myprog ... opcontrol --dump opcontrol --shutdown then I run, opreport -l

> On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:20 PM, George Karpenkov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Thus, I propose modifying FileCheck default behavior to dump all swallowed output on stderr when the test has failed. > Would there be any objections to

I need to schedule a process/program every hour on the hour between 9am and 4pm on the 2nd through the 9th of each month except on Saturday and Sunday.? So, I tried this entry: 0 9-16 2-9 * 1-5 ./myprog.sh Unfortunately it runs outside of the 2nd through the 9th and still runs on Sat. through Sun. Is there a way to do this (outside the program itself)? -Frank

Hi, Debugging tests which make use of FileCheck can be a frustrating experience, as all input will be swallowed (even with -v flag passed to lit), and one would often need to copy-and-paste and rerun the failing command manually without piping into FileCheck. Initially I’ve assumed that this is done due to stream processing, but looking at FileCheck source code I can see that it actually gets the

On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 10:07 AM Daniel Dunbar <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 8, 2017, at 7:32 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ideally/the better integration with Buildbot would be to have these > outputs referenced as "associated files" (it's been a while since I played > with buildbot - I remember finding this

I am trying to compile an application on a CentOS 5.0 64-bit machine that gives me the error: /usr/local/bin/myprog: /usr/lib64/libstdc++: version `GLIBXX.3.4.9' not found (required by /usr/local/bin/myprog) I have gcc 4.2.3. I've performed a yum install compat-* and glibc* What am I missing? Thanks. Scott

Hi, I am trying the lattice graphics in R. Let's say, such a little experiment in file myprog.r: f <- function(){ x <- 1:10 y <- x^2 xyplot(y ~ x) } f() Then I run the program: > source("myprog.r") but nothing happens. Manully run f() at the command line: > f() then the figure is shown. This seems to be a bug only associated with lattice graphics, the

Hello. I've made out a Debian package out of Maxence Guesdon's OCaml/R bindings: http://yziquel.homelinux.org/topos/debian-ocamlr.html http://yziquel.homelinux.org/debian/pool/main/o/ocaml-r/ The upstream software itself is on the following page: http://home.gna.org/ocaml-r/ This binding is dynamically linked to the /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so and to the /usr/lib/libRmath.so libraries.

I am getting this error message when I try to run Rcmd SHLIB myprog.c. There appears to be a missing / between etc and i386 in the path. I am on Windows Vista and am using R version 2.12.1 Patched (2010-12-16 r53864) and just downloaded Rtools 2.12 today. Is this a bug in R? How can I resolve this? C:\tmp2>Rcmd SHLIB myprog.c cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected:

I understand that it is applied automatically when needed, but there are times when one would want to run it manually. An example is when I want to literally create a new wine prefix such as env WINEPREFIX="/home/bamm/apps/myprog" wineprefixcreate to prepare a clean profile for future installation of myprog. I know that running setup with a WINEPREFIX would create the clean profile,

Is this on both EL6 and EL7? If only EL7, it could be control groups causing the issue. The idea of cgroups is to prevent zombie processes, but if you need your program to spawn another process then restart itself while the other process continues to run, you need to launch it in a different control group, or the shutdown of the parent process will also kill the child. In my case, we have an

I'm fairly astute at C and R but new to parallelization. Would someone be willing to provide help in the form of a simple example that parallelizes an R function from the inside of a C routine? If so, write me back at izmirlig at mail.nih.gov Thanks!

+ Chandler, Danny, We are considering to move the libFuzzer code from llvm to compiler-rt, and that implies a license change. Will it be sufficient to do the following? * e-mail to all contributors (a short list, below) asking for their consent * remove any code for which we did not get consent in, say, 1 week. (BTW, this list is actually much shorter, I recognize many of these as belonging

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:54 AM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:30 AM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Jul 12, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:

> On Jul 17, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Daniel Berlin <dannyb at google.com> wrote: > > This process works legally, but i can't speak to whether the foundation would be okay with it, as it may result in bad press, etc, if you rip code out. Thank you for your reply! I have two additional questions: 1) Why is it ripping the code out if compiler-rt is still part of LLVM? 2) Does it mean

Hi, As a part of a recent move of libFuzzer from LLVM to compiler-rt I am looking into updating the build code for the libraries which use libFuzzer. I have tried to compile llvm-mc-assemble-fuzzer, and llvm-mc-disassemble-fuzzer, and I couldn’t build either of those. For the first one, the reason is that it refers to a nonexistent enum, and for the second one I believe the reason is that it