similar to: [LNT] Tests for web UI/javascript?

There was this PR to use Jasmine: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20161 But I think it did not make it into tree. Kristof, any update on the issues you were encountering? We could move forward with that. I think we were pretty agnostic to which framework to use as long as it was not hard to install. JS Testing would be *really* good. I have debugged a lot of issues recently that ended up in the JS.

Thanks. I've rebased this patch on top of the recent LLVM (it was straightforward) and applied it in my fork. It seems to have solved one of the problems I was having. Would LLVM be interested if I submit the updated version for the review? -- Danila From: Philip Reames [mailto:listmail at philipreames.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 19:01 To: Danila Malyutin <Danila.Malyutin at

Hi, The new LNT server instance http://lnt.llvm.org seems to fail in many cases. Any entrance to a 'Run page' (e.g. http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/62475) and lately also many perf bots result submissions (e.g. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf/builds/2262/steps/test-suite/logs/stdio ) fails with: "500 Internal Server Error". Any ideas? Thanks,

I've noticed that there was an attempt to mitigate ExitValues problem in https://reviews.llvm.org/D12494 that went nowhere. Were there particular issues with that approach? -- Danila From: Philip Reames [mailto:listmail at philipreames.com] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2019 02:05 To: Danila Malyutin <Danila.Malyutin at synopsys.com>; Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov> Cc: llvm-dev

Hi, I noticed that easy_install of lnt 0.4.1dev doesn't work: # easy_install lnt==0.4.1dev Searching for lnt==0.4.1dev Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/lnt/ No local packages or download links found for lnt==0.4.1dev error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('lnt==0.4.1dev') -Gabriel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi Hal, I see. So LSR could theoretically counteract undesirable Ind Var transformations but it's not implemented at the moment? I think I've managed to come up with a small reproducer that can also exhibit similar problem on x86, here it is: https://godbolt.org/z/_wxzut As you can see, when rewriteLoopExitValues is not disabled Clang generates worse code due to additional spills,

Folks, I'm scratching my head to understand what's wrong with this bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt/builds/7783/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio There were no recent commits to lnt or the test-suite and I've cleaned the lnt.venv on the bot, but it's still failing. I also haven't updated the packages or anything on the bot. Can any LNT specialist

The run page problem were triggered by one of my commits (sorry) and should be mitigated now, see the thread at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html> I don't know about the submission problems, could they just an occasional network problem or are they a common phenomenon? Chris did some

Hi Since the buildbot host was updated to Fedora F20 levels, the clang buildbot has been failing with the following: $ /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/lnt.venv/bin/lnt runtest --verbose --submit http://llvm.org/perf/submitRun --commit=1 nt --sandbox nt --no-timestamp --cc /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang --cxx /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang++

Hi all, When we compare two testings, each of which is run with three samples, how would LNT show whether the comparison is reliable or not? I have seen that the function get_value_status in reporting/analysis.py uses a very simple algorithm to infer data status. For example, if abs(self.delta) <= (self.stddev * confidence_interval), then the data status is set as UNCHANGED. However, it

On 06/23/2013 11:12 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi all, > > > When we compare two testings, each of which is run with three samples, how would LNT show whether the comparison is reliable or not? > > > I have seen that the function get_value_status in reporting/analysis.py uses a very simple algorithm to infer data status. For example, if abs(self.delta) <= (self.stddev *

Up to now, the tests have been running with whitespace stripped out. Newlines and tabs are insignificant in HTML, so I figured why bother with them? Now I realize why: they''re significant in pre tags and they also make your code look pretty! I''ve been working to get SRC output to roughly match Tetxile2''s as far as tabs and newlines go. It''s tough and

I followed the lnt quickstart <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html> directions but got this diagnostic when doing the setup: bash-3.2$ ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop /Users/dcallahan/mysandbox/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:284: UserWarning: The version spec\ ified requires normalization, consider using '0.4.1.dev0' instead of

Hi, working on the LNT documentation I am wondering about a few things: - LNT documentation recommends to do `easy_install lnt==0.4.2dev` (in the install box on the left side of the title page). The last available version of LNT on pypy is version 0.4.0 from 2012. Are there plans to keep this up to date or should we better remove the entry and not mention pypy packages anymore? - Building the

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias.grosser at inf.ethz.ch> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017, at 00:33, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: >> The run page problem were triggered by one of my commits (sorry) and >> should be mitigated now, see the thread at >> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html >>

Hi, I have recently moved the clang-native-arm-lnt-perf bot from the nt producer to the test-suite producer. It seems to be working fine but it doesn't manage to submit the results to http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun. If you scroll down to the bottom of [1], you can see this error message: 2017-08-28 07:06:32: submitting result to 'http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun' error: lnt server:

Hi David, That's weird, I have setup LNT in multiple different distros and have never seen this. Looks like no one ever tested on the system you're running. Can you share a bit more of your environment? Also, you can check the setup.py to see if it does any stripping of package names, which could go wrong in the wrong environment. cheers, --renato On 29 January 2015 at 20:13, David

Hello everyone, It seems the LNT server is down returning error 500. Could somebody restart it, please? Who is in charge of it now? Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141124/d32b6d6a/attachment.html>

Chris is on vacation this week. Not sure if someone else has access to the logs... - Matthias > On Aug 2, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias.grosser at inf.ethz.ch> wrote: > > OK, who is in charge? > > Best, > Tobias > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 21:45, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: >> >>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Tobias Grosser

It appears that lnt has the capability to run the SPEC2000/2006/2017(maybe) tests from looking at the options and from poking around in the mailing list archives. Or does it? I experimented a bit and cannot get it to work right. However, it isn't really documented anywhere so maybe I didn't set it up properly. Plus there's all the mention of llvmgcc... So is anyone doing