similar to: [Kaleidoscope] symbol(s) not found during compiling

Hi, It seems that Bugzilla (https://bugs.llvm.org/) is down, when I using the search engine. -- Best Regards, Xing

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: > > > > On 11/16/16 11:48 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> An issue that come up from time to time and has cost hours for debug for >> many of us and users of LLVM is that an assert build isn’t ABI >> compatible with a release build.

Folks, Total newbie here. What is the simplest way to build a single .rst file so that I can look at the generated HTML? I have CMake, Python, and Sphinx installed. ~~ Paul

Hi all, An issue that come up from time to time and has cost hours for debug for many of us and users of LLVM is that an assert build isn’t ABI compatible with a release build. The CMake flags that controls this behavior is LLVM_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS ( LLVM_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS:STRING Used to decide if LLVM should be built with ABI breaking checks or not. Allowed values are WITH_ASSERTS (default),

The "Revert [tag] message" is the default message generated by the 'git revert' command. Of course you would have to be using a git clone of LLVM instead of an SVN checkout in order to run 'git revert'. This command is the equivalent of 'svn merge –r' run from the top-level directory. I believe svn commands will operate only on the directories below the current

Madhur Amilkanthwar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>於 2020年8月9日 週日，上午1:53寫道： > Hi Paul, > I hope you have gone through > https://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html#how-to-submit-a-patch. > > Generally, I would do 'git add' on the new file. 'git diff' should show me > the newly added file. Further, I'd just do 'arc diff' and this should

Hi, I am brand new to LLVM, or more precisely, trying to be. I'm getting stuck on compiling LLVM. - I tried installing on a Mint 18.1 VM with 6GB RAM, and the builds of some large executables were killed by the OOM killer. I finally realized that I needed to build using shared libraries, and succeeded. This was in November. - I put aside my LLVM project, and just got back to it. I got stuck

There is already 10 PRs sent to GitHub repo. But they all are useless, in every PR people are being informed that they should send patches to http://reviews.llvm.org/

I decided to start playing around with building my own programming language recently, and to use LLVM to handle the assembly-level details. I'm on Kubuntu 18.04, and I started out using LLVM 6.0 from Kubuntu's packages. I put together code for dealing with my language, then went over the Kaleidoscope tutorials (which have been extremely helpful btw!). I was able to successfully get my

Personally I'd like a "git llvm fetch-diff D1234" subcommand, which outputs a patch in the format of "git format-patch", which, you could then pipe to "git am", say, providing whatever prefix options you like. On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:41 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Are you trying to apply a revision

I believe the compiler will generate a .debug_ranges section if you use -ffunction-sections, since the addresses of sections will be non-contiguous. From there, you should be able to edit the .debug_ranges assembly as needed (replace references to symbols with 0s in the .debug_ranges content) to get the exact behaviour you want (I'm assuming you don't want to have to hand-edit a

Hi, when using the "Debug" build of LLVM 8.0 my application which uses the LLVM builder and MCJIT components fails at startup with: symbol lookup error: ./main: undefined symbol: _ZN4llvm23EnableABIBreakingChecksE (unmangled: llvm::EnableABIBreakingChecks) The application works fine with the "Release" build of LLVM 8.0! (Right now, I need the Debug build for access to

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:53 PM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Rarrum, > > Kubuntu 20.04 LTS is available. You may be able to upgrade to 19.10, and > then to 20.04 without reinstalling. It can be done on Xubuntu. A direct > upgrade to 20.04 should become available. LLVM 10 then installs from the > distribution packages. I put all this on a

Is "Unix Makefiles" what I want if I am building on Windows using GNU make? At 7/28/2020 10:41 PM, Xing GUO wrote: >On 7/29/20, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev ><llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Total newbie here. What is the simplest way to build a single .rst file so >> that I can look at the generated HTML? I have CMake,

Hi everyone, I'm looking through codes related to registered pressure tracking, mainly the source files 'RegisterPressure.h/cpp', 'MachineRegisterInfo.h/cpp', 'TargetRegisterInfo.h/cpp'. There is a concept I can hardly understand, the 'register pressure set'. Class 'TargetRegisterInfo' defines two virtual methods 'getRegClassPressureSets' and

I've managed to get 10.0.0 working now.. there were a couple things I had to adjust. The Kaleidoscope example had me doing this before creating the object file: llvm::InitializeAllTargetInfos(); llvm::InitializeAllTargets(); llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs(); llvm::InitializeAllAsmParsers(); llvm::InitializeAllAsmPrinters(); It turns out I can get away with just this, since I'm not (yet)

Hi folks, Several days ago, I made a bad change in llvm, and I reverted it using following command ``` $ svn merge -r <bad change revision>:<previous revision> ``` However, this command seemed not working properly. I would like to know, what's the right way to revert a bad change. I notice that there are some reverting change with proper message, e.g. "Revert: [some tag]

Fellow Rail users and developers, Right now the easiest way to run Rails is in combination with Mongrel. However, it may not be a good idea to expose Mongrel directly to the outside world in a high-load production environment. In-addition, Mongrel_cluster + proxy + load balancer have to be used even for a single server deployment making the unified setup more complicated than needs be.

Hi LLVM community, Currently LLVM backend do pre-RA machine instruction scheduling in non-SSA form, I doubt why not do machine scheduling in SSA machine instruction form? Now LLVM’s machine scheduling uses a list-scheduling algorithm, but if we wang to support more complex scheduling algorithms, for example, modulo scheduling for loops, it seems more easy to accomplish this in SSA form as SSA is

Does any one have a sample code for a Spider Plot as attached? Thanks, Xing