similar to: Phabricator emails down?

This has been going on since at least Friday too. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:45 AM Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> phabricator seems to have stopped sending emails. All other functionality >> is ok, it just does not

We should be back up - please let me know if anything doesn't work as expected... Cheers, /Manuel On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Just as a tiny update, Manuel is actively working on it, but a small issue > has turned into a larger issue... stay tuned... > > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek

Yep, sorry, we ran out of space on the instance's database volume. I'll update this once we're back up. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following: > > [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering. > -

Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following: [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering. - AphrontQueryConnectionException: Attempt to connect to phabricator at localhost failed with error #1040: Too many connections. - InvalidArgumentException: Argument 1 passed to AphrontView::setUser() must be an instance of PhabricatorUser, null

Hello all, I broke the build, but I did not receive any blame email about it. I have a feeling the blame emails are not working. Is anyone experiencing the same thing? Could it be related to the last-week master restart (which seems to have reset build numbers as well)? regards, pl

Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: > I'll go ahead and file one though - more and more people are using phab > for llvm, so the problems with it are coming up more and more often. https://secure.phabricator.com/T8269

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs < >> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >>> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. >>>

Heya, I'll look into it first thing tomorrow - probably a problem with the encoding settings. On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 9:17:40 PM Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > What I'm seeing is that Phabricator emails double-space *everything* > (not just the diffs). > > --paulr > > > > *From:* cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Manuel, It's been brought to my attention that my usage of the Phabricator Audit tool to track which commits have been reviewed is causing a large number of (almost) empty emails to be sent to the commit authors and anyone else added to the audit as a reviewer. Presumably there are some state change emails that we haven't blocked yet (e.g. the 'Accept commit' and 'Resign

Yes. I'm seeing the problem. The error text is: Cannot override final method LiskDAO::loadOneRelative() /srv/http/phabricator/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php:7 On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> >> When accessing

Dear LLVM / Clang community, we'd like to open the use of Phabricator as an optional tool for doing code reviews to a wider audience. Please feel free to start your code reviews by following the documentation at http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html. Note that e-mail is still the reference medium for code reviews. Please let me know about any problems with Phabricator or the documentation

This might be slightly off topic, but I'd really like a way to be able to run the buildbots off a Phabricator Diff before committing. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > Unfortunately threading will be broken for changes currently under review > (new patches shouldn't have the problem). > I'm very sorry for this inconvenience

On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 12:55:01 PM İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Can you point me at an example? I've spot checked stuff and cannot see > > anything out of the ordinary... > > This is only visible in GMail for me but looks like Phabricator is now >

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: > On 12 May 2014 08:35, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> > wrote: > >> > >> It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any > >> more: > >> $ svn

It seems emails to me were not sent out due to them being held back by sendgrid spam protection. In case somebody else has this problem, this might be something to look into. Best, Tobias On Fri, Jul 14, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev wrote: > Phab was down during the night, should be back up now. When phab is down, > emails don't get sent out (all emails get sent out

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 10/18/2012 4:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> >> Facebook is not the only OAuth provider though. We should be able to >> support essentially any you would prefer if that's all. Manuel's comment >> still stands if OAuth is a problem. >> > > My

Hi folks, phabricator maintenance is a topic that has been lying dormant for a while now. That subsequently creates a non-optimal user experience. For me personally, given that github provides a secure PR infrastructure, the additional effort required to keep Phab going is not an investment I'm personally willing to make. I understand that there are unique selling points for Phab in its UI

On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, 18:55 Hubert Tong, <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:32 PM Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Just my 2 cents here: we are working on enabling this as a part of >> bugzilla migration as PRs and issues are very tied inside GitHub. Stay >> tuned for updates!

Just my 2 cents here: we are working on enabling this as a part of bugzilla migration as PRs and issues are very tied inside GitHub. Stay tuned for updates! On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:45 PM Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > -Chris' outdated email, +Chris' correct email :) > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:01 PM Manuel Klimek <klimek at

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > You might want to mention other functionality, like Herald, which I > think fills a need that a lot of developers have. > > Well, I guess since this message is on the list, I can just say: > Phabricator's "Herald" tool lets you (among other things) set up > actions to happen in