similar to: Pre-built binary LLVM 3.9.1 for Ubuntu 14.04 is missing

Hi, I'm Ryo Ota. I have two questions about `llvm::LLVMContext`. Q1) What is the difference between the following (A)`my_context` and (B)`global_context`? Do I have to create a LLVMContext by myself? Or use `getGlobalContext()`? Could you tell me what situation needs a LLVMContext which is created by myself such as (A)? (A) { llvm::LLVMContext my_context; // codes using only my_context (get

Hi, I'm Ryo Ota. I'm using LLVM 3.8.1. I have a quesion about inlining function in C++ API. I'd like to inline some functions in a module in the same way as `opt -inline` command. But my C++ code didn't work what I want to do. For example, by using `opt -inline` command,`main.ll` is converted into the `inlined.ll`(`opt` command worked what I want to do) [main.ll (Not inlined)]

Hi, all I found two of my bricks from different volumes are using the same port 49154 on the same glusterfs server node, is this normal? Status of volume: home-rabbitmq-qa Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brick 10.10.1.100:/glusterfsvolumes/home/ho me-rabbitmq-qa/brick

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Yong Zhang <hiscal at outlook.com> wrote: > Hi, all > > > > I found two of my bricks from different volumes are using the same port > 49154 on the same glusterfs server node, is this normal? > No it's not. Can you please help me with the following information: 1. gluster --version 2. glusterd log & cmd_history logs from both

Isn't this just brick multiplexing? On June 19, 2017 5:55:54 AM PDT, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: >On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Yong Zhang <hiscal at outlook.com> wrote: > >> Hi, all >> >> >> >> I found two of my bricks from different volumes are using the same >port >> 49154 on the same glusterfs server node, is

+stable@ Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > Why are so many people are bitten by this? Is that the jobs of port-upgrading > tool to safe copy these libraries to compat so that all programs using > the old libraries works? Portupgrade preserves the libraries in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg: % ls /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ libicudata.so.36.0 libicule.so.36.0 libicuuc.so.36.0

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi All, As I have notified before, The 1st Linux IO controller Mini-Summit will be held in Tokyo Japan on Oct 17 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. So I would like to propose the following topics for the mini-summit and discuss about them. - Multiple IO controller development projects - There are two activities for the development of IO controller, Vivek's io-controller and

Hi All, As I have notified before, The 1st Linux IO controller Mini-Summit will be held in Tokyo Japan on Oct 17 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. So I would like to propose the following topics for the mini-summit and discuss about them. - Multiple IO controller development projects - There are two activities for the development of IO controller, Vivek's io-controller and

Hi All, As I have notified before, The 1st Linux IO controller Mini-Summit will be held in Tokyo Japan on Oct 17 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. So I would like to propose the following topics for the mini-summit and discuss about them. - Multiple IO controller development projects - There are two activities for the development of IO controller, Vivek's io-controller and

Hi All, I have got excellent results of dm-ioband, that controls the disk I/O bandwidth even when it accepts delayed write requests. In this time, I ran some benchmarks with a high-end storage. The reason was to avoid a performance bottleneck due to mechanical factors such as seek time. You can see the details of the benchmarks at: http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/hps/ Thanks, Ryo

Hi All, I have got excellent results of dm-ioband, that controls the disk I/O bandwidth even when it accepts delayed write requests. In this time, I ran some benchmarks with a high-end storage. The reason was to avoid a performance bottleneck due to mechanical factors such as seek time. You can see the details of the benchmarks at: http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/hps/ Thanks, Ryo

Hi All, I have got excellent results of dm-ioband, that controls the disk I/O bandwidth even when it accepts delayed write requests. In this time, I ran some benchmarks with a high-end storage. The reason was to avoid a performance bottleneck due to mechanical factors such as seek time. You can see the details of the benchmarks at: http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/hps/ Thanks, Ryo

Hi Kamezawa-san, As you wrote before (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/22/65) > To be honest, what I expected in these days for people of blockio > cgroup is like following for getting room for themselves. <<snip>> > --- mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h > +++ mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16/include/linux/page_cgroup.h > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > struct page_cgroup { >

Hi Kamezawa-san, As you wrote before (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/22/65) > To be honest, what I expected in these days for people of blockio > cgroup is like following for getting room for themselves. <<snip>> > --- mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h > +++ mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16/include/linux/page_cgroup.h > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > struct page_cgroup { >

Hi Kamezawa-san, As you wrote before (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/22/65) > To be honest, what I expected in these days for people of blockio > cgroup is like following for getting room for themselves. <<snip>> > --- mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h > +++ mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16/include/linux/page_cgroup.h > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > struct page_cgroup { >

Hello all, I've implemented a block device which throttles block I/O bandwidth, which I called dm-ioband, and been trying to throttle I/O bandwidth on KVM environment. But unfortunately it doesn't work well, the number of issued I/Os is not according to the bandwidth setting. On the other hand, I got the good result when accessing directly to the local disk on the local machine. I'm

Hello all, I've implemented a block device which throttles block I/O bandwidth, which I called dm-ioband, and been trying to throttle I/O bandwidth on KVM environment. But unfortunately it doesn't work well, the number of issued I/Os is not according to the bandwidth setting. On the other hand, I got the good result when accessing directly to the local disk on the local machine. I'm