similar to: Restarting a stalled patch

Thanks. I have gone that route and there was no response. What constitutes 'particularly urgent'? In regards to D30107<https://reviews.llvm.org/D30107> it some fairly obvious defect(s) and there are a few bugs open in your database about the issue, but it seems an area that doesn't get much interest (related to DynamicLibrary class). Thanks again.

Ughs, I'm not dying to wait months...but if it thats the way it is, then its the way it is. Tends to be so many commits in a day it seemed it was being lost in the noise/clique. I did try to add some notes to the bug tracker, but new logins are disabled, and the email to get one never replied...but I guess that's another topic! Thanks again, definitely alleviated some frustrations.

I keep running into errors on the i686-mingw32-RA-on-linux bot and was curious if someone could test a patch against the bot or something with a similar setup. I believe it should now work properly, but would like to make sure that it'll pass before possibly adding a third commit/revert cycle. If the history isn't an issue, let me know an I'll just keep trying. The differential is

I ran into a similar problem a while ago; see https://reviews.llvm.org/D30107 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D33515 .  You get the unusual stack trace because it's trying to call a destructor in shared library which was already unloaded. I thought we had fixed that, but maybe not?  Looking again, it looks like the patch got reverted and I didn't notice. -Eli On 5/14/2018 10:18 PM,

It's working with trunk though. Do you think the patch will end up in 6.0.1? Thanks. Simone On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I ran into a similar problem a while ago; see https://reviews.llvm.org/ > D30107 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D33515 . You get the unusual stack > trace because it's trying to call a destructor

Hello, Using Dovecot's deliver MDA, all mails are stored with the line "From <sender> <date>" appended. When forwarding these mails as attachements, the recipients get the source code. When Postfix delivers emails directly in the Maildirs, this first line is not appended, and there is no problem when forwarding the mails. Why is this line appended by deliver ? Is

Hi all, sorry for my inexperience. I am still learning. I searched for a while but found nothing useful. I am looking for the best way to manipulate headers, bodies, attachments, locations, folders and/or flags while using deliver and e.g. perl. In other words manipulating the whole mail in respect of the requirements of the LDA, MUA and User. I see two diffent ways. As i understand I can

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:29 PM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > No I didn't, I used cl.exe from the visual studio toolchain. What I'm > proposing is a tool for processing .obj files in COFF format, reading them > and generating the GHASH part. > > To make our build faster we use hundreds of unity build files (.cpp's with > a

tengo una pregunta : si tengo una red y dentro de esta hay 10 grupos de trabajo, pero en mi servidor samba solo acepta que especifique un solo grupo de trabajo, ?hay alguna manera de que el servidor samba se vea en dos grupos distintos????? _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Construye tu p?gina personal en Yahoo! GeoCities. ?Es f?cil, r?pido y gratis!

I've been playing with the Win32 SYSLINUX, and it fails if you're not using NT or 2K or XP. There are some differences when using it under Win95/98/ME, but is there any reason that this program couldn't just have a different codepath for those older version of Windows? Alex Pavloff - apavloff at esatechnology.com ESA Technology ---- www.esatechnology.com ------- Linux-based

This is the correct path to the pass: https://github.com/PRUNERS/sword/blob/master/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/InstrumentParallel.cpp On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Simone Atzeni <simone.at at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was porting my pass from LLVM 4.0 to 6.0 and I am getting a segmentation > fault. > I was able to obtain only the info below from GDB. > >

Can you please help or point me in the correct direction to solve the following problem We have an old stock control program which runs on all types of MS os's from DOS to NT4. However, It refuses to lock correctly on a samba server (Version samba-2.0.6-19991110.386.rpm). When both the file and lock program are placed in the same directory and the lock program run from a dos prompt on one

Hi I have ported syslinux to win2k/winxp. It is attached. It has been tested with floppies and flashcards, but not on harddisks. On harddisks I'm not sure if I should use \\.\PHYSICALDRIVEX or \\.\X: as arguments to CreateFile (I'm no windows wiz) and I do not currently have a system to test this on. The program can be compiled using mingw or in cygwin using the option -mno-cygwin

Hi all, I was porting my pass from LLVM 4.0 to 6.0 and I am getting a segmentation fault. I was able to obtain only the info below from GDB. I tried to debug with some printf and the runOnFunction runs correctly. Any idea/suggestion about what is going on? The source code of the pass is here: https://github.com/PRUNERS/sword/blob/master/lib/Sword.cpp Any help is much appreciated, Thanks!

Hello again, Here's the next big issue, I thought I'd let you munch on. We are utilizing Cisco 7960's and the following entries in our extensions.conf file: Exten => 1637,1,Dial(SIP/100) Exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@sipdemo) Exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,2,Congestion Exten => _1NXXXXXXXXX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@sipdemo) Exten => _1NXXXXXXXXX,2,Congestion These

Hi Maybe you allready fixed this problem but here goes: with ext3-0.9.10 and linux-2.4.10-SMP I get a hang doing the following: # mkdir test # cd test # rmdir ../test # ls There are no problems in ext3-0.9.12 and linux-2.4.10-ac11. Regards -- Lars Munch P.S. plz cc me, as I'm not on the list.

Hello, I need 6 virtual interfaces in a domU (which will be our firewall). I''ve created 6 bridges in dom0, configured everything correctly... When I start the domU, it can only see 3 of them : eth0, eth1, eth2. However, the bridges in dom0 are correctly configured, and I can see all 6 vifs (from vif<DOM_ID>.0 to vif<DOM_ID>.5) when using "brctl show". On the

Hello, I''m trying to install Xen3 on a server, but I can''t make the MegaRAID driver work. I''ve installed Debian Sarge, the stock kernel (2.6.8.2) works perfectly with the hardware. The SCSI RAID driver is megaraid. Hardware is : - IBM eServer xSeries 330 server - Dell PowerEdge RAID II controller I''ve recompiled the xen dom0 kernel (2.6.12.6) to include

Hello, I'm trying to get Xen 3.1 from backports.org to work on a Debian Etch server. I can't find a kernel corresponding to Xen 3.1. Which kernel should I use ? Is there an installation guide somewhere ? Thanks a lot -- S?bastien Munch - http://www.yeiazel.net Qui bene amat, bene castigat

> On Jan 10, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote > > Some tests I can suggest is to replace the hash function with your favorite and: Thanks. I’ll give it a try. It will take some time as I need to rewrite DenseMap if I want to use the Knuth multiplicative hash. > ultimately I believe real-world impact is the best way to get a change in. That’s