Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "LLVM Pass - Backend Instrumentation"
2011 Jul 12
1
spatial logit help
Please I am new to R. I got the following code from a friend:
gmat <- cbind(gmat,p*(1-p)*wxb)
for (j in seq(1:ncol(gmat))) {
gmat[,j] <- fitted(lm(gmat[,j]~zmat))
}
It is for spatial logit.
After defining all the matrices in it such as P, wxb, gmat, and zmat,
I tried to run it in R and got the following error message:
Error in model.frame.default(formula = gmat[, j] ~ zmat,
2012 Feb 07
1
[LLVMdev] ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug
Evan,
A test case is extremely hard to pin down. For months now, we've noticed
our stage 2 LLVM ARM build has sporadic failures. Tests would start
failing, then start working, then start failing, etc, for no apparent
reason.
The test case I have (llc.bc, which is all of llc in bitcode form, 44.8
MB), only works against r149814. And in this case, there are only 2 cases
of the miscompile
2012 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug
I've committed a fix: r149970. Please try it. I would really appreciate it if you can provide us with a test case (unreduced test case is fine).
Evan
On 2012 2 4, at 09:46, David Meyer <pdox at google.com> wrote:
> Evan & llvmdev,
>
> I'm seeing a case where ARM Load/Store optimizer is breaking code. I have not had any luck trying to come up with a minimal example;
2003 Sep 09
1
Dynamic SIP outbound usernames?
Hi,
I have * set up as a PSTN->VoIP gateway (with an E1 with multiple
numbers pointing to it).
I'd really like to be able to dial out to a SIP server like so:
exten => _X.,1,Dial(SIP/${DNID}@hostname)
I.e. the remote SIP server receives a SIP INVITE with a "To:" header
containing the dialed number (e.g. 02085555555@computer.company.com).
This is equivalent to having a
2012 Feb 04
4
[LLVMdev] ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug
Evan & llvmdev,
I'm seeing a case where ARM Load/Store optimizer is breaking code. I have
not had any luck trying to come up with a minimal example; it is breaking
in our stage 2 LLVM build.
But here's what I'm seeing in the debug output:
# Before ARMLoadStoreOptimizer:
BB#21: derived from LLVM BB %cond.end
Live Ins: %LR %R0 %R1 %R7 %R10 %R11
Predecessors according to
2010 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] Question About Target Dependent Optimization
My name is Isaac. I'm a student at Cal Poly State University, San Luis
Obispo, and I'm currently finishing my thesis on target-specific code
optimization for my master's degree. I was wondering if I could ask a few
questions I have about working with the LLVM codebase.
My thesis involves optimizing the way that LLVM deals with memory operations
when targeting the ARM processor
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt
Here's an ARM test that cores:
$ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ gdb `which llc` llc.core
[...]
(gdb) where
#0 0x0853d606 in
2007 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Is this the same issue as PR1686? If so, please add to it. What kind
of host machine are you using?
Thanks,
Evan
On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
>> http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt
>
> Here's an ARM test that cores:
>
> $ llvm-as <
2003 Aug 13
3
h extension seems to wipe variables?
Hi.
I'm trying to do some custom call logging, and I want to call an AGI
script from a hangup handler to log call durations and things. Although
the script executes, it isn't retrieving variables from the AGI
interface. Looking closer, I realised the variables are actually getting
unset before the h extension is reached.
[foo]
s,1,SetVar,foo=bar
s,2,Play(audio/a-long-prompt)
2003 Feb 18
4
Samba processes
Hi
Am noticing smbd processes are running as root and occassionally I see a
child process as userid
Just curios under what circumstances the smbd runs as user id process ( unix
id ) and running as root is a security risk?
Thanks in advance
-Abdul
2004 Apr 04
8
Can I give more bandwidth to a specific URL
Hi all,
Can I give more bandwidth to a specific URL.
Regards
Abdul Khader
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2009 May 06
4
subset data
Dear all,
> data <- data.frame(id=seq(1:10),x=runif(10))
> data
id x
1 1 0.3604464
2 2 0.4813987
3 3 0.0160058
4 4 0.7165909
5 5 0.6092248
6 6 0.2413049
7 7 0.7981568
8 8 0.6093960
9 9 0.2887064
10 10 0.3485780
> selected.id <- sample(data$id,3,replace=F)
> selected.id
[1] 9 7 1
I want to select data with corresponding selected.id, namely
>
2003 Sep 12
3
E400P woes
We've changed E1 providers and I'm trying to reconfigure an E400P to
make it work with the new lines. They're supposedly "standard" EuroISDN
lines (in the UK). I'm initially just trying to get a single line up.
I have the following in /etc/zaptel.conf:
span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=1-15
dchan=16
bchan=17-31
loadzone=uk
defaultzone=uk
The LED on the back
2009 Feb 11
7
Volume group "VolGroup00" not found
Hi,
I am compiling Xen from source on FC9. On booting the
Xen dom0 kernel it gives the following error:
Volume group "VolGroup00" not found
and ultimately the error that switchroot: mount failed: No such file or
directory
So my question is that why it fails to detect logical volumes?
Thanks,
Abdul Qadeer
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
2012 Jun 07
3
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang
Thanks alot Chad for quick response. Does this means that, we can not
use LLVM optimizations except O1, O2, O3, O4 and unroll-loops with
clang?
One more thing I would like to know that If I want to process multiple
modules with opt at the same time like
opt -adce *.bc
then how is it possible with opt in one go, if I process all the
bytecode files within Makefile.
Thanks.
Shahzad
On Thu, Jun
2012 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang
Hi Shahzad,
> Is it possible that we can use LLVM optimization beside O1, O2, O3
> along with dragonegg plugin?
sure, try this:
gcc -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so ...other_options_here... -S -o -
-fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-ir-optimize=0 | opt
-pass1 -pass2 ...
Here -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir tells it to output LLVM IR rather than
target assembler.
2012 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang
Hi Shahzad,
> I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to
> produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is
> producing an error
>
> $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c
> -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce
this won't work because you aren't passing the IR to opt (you need -o - for
that if using a pipe) and you
2002 Jul 31
8
Desktop.ini and samba - Please comment
I was just wondering why does samba look for Desktop.ini when i am mapping
to my home directory from w2k
running samba 2.2.5 on sol2.6 , client is w2k
am troubleshooting an weird issue where am not able to see all my unix home
directory files on w2k
log level10 is showing me that samba is looking for Desktop.ini
could this be cousing something weired.
thanks in advance
2004 Dec 21
10
Codec Selection
Hi,
I have 2 g729 licences - what I want to do is use g729 by default but if
I get more than 2 calls at a time, use gsm for the others.
So, I put this on all my sip providers:
disallow=all
allow=g729
allow=gsm
However, this just seems to use gsm for everything. If I comment out the
gsm line, it then uses g729.
I thought it would use the codec's in the order they are allowed - is
this
2012 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang
Hello
I need some help here please.
If we compile source files directly in to native code:
$ clang -O3 -lm *.c
then the runtime is like following
real 0m2.807s
user 0m2.784s
sys 0m0.012s
and If we emit LLVM bytcode and apply optimizations
$ clang -O3 -c -emit-llvm *.c
$ llvm-link *.o -o comb.ll
$ time lli ./comb.ll
then the runtime is
real 0m2.671s
user 0m2.640s
sys 0m0.020s
But, if I